summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@comx.dk>2009-03-30 03:03:01 +0400
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2009-04-02 12:33:50 +0400
commit3943ac5d99ec024f97442e5f3def1034bb0b1bb0 (patch)
treed3167de5bbe5d566f58f951381f2cbcde28cde90 /Documentation
parent9ba30d74446dd0629d797ecd038379725d351bc6 (diff)
downloadlinux-3943ac5d99ec024f97442e5f3def1034bb0b1bb0.tar.xz
Doc: Fix wrong API example usage of call_rcu().
At some point the API of call_rcu() changed from three parameters to two parameters, correct the documentation. One confusing thing in RCU/listRCU.txt, which is NOT fixed in this patch, is that no reason or explaination is given for using call_rcu() instead of the normal synchronize_rcu() call. Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@comx.dk> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt6
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt b/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt
index 1fd175368a87..4349c1487e91 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/listRCU.txt
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ Following are the RCU equivalents for these two functions:
list_for_each_entry(e, list, list) {
if (!audit_compare_rule(rule, &e->rule)) {
list_del_rcu(&e->list);
- call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule, e);
+ call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule);
return 0;
}
}
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ RCU ("read-copy update") its name. The RCU code is as follows:
ne->rule.action = newaction;
ne->rule.file_count = newfield_count;
list_replace_rcu(e, ne);
- call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule, e);
+ call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule);
return 0;
}
}
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ flag under the spinlock as follows:
list_del_rcu(&e->list);
e->deleted = 1;
spin_unlock(&e->lock);
- call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule, e);
+ call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule);
return 0;
}
}