Merge tag 'docs-4.18' of git://git.lwn.net/linux

Pull documentation updates from Jonathan Corbet:
 "There's been a fair amount of work in the docs tree this time around,
  including:

   - Extensive RST conversions and organizational work in the
     memory-management docs thanks to Mike Rapoport.

   - An update of Documentation/features from Andrea Parri and a script
     to keep it updated.

   - Various LICENSES updates from Thomas, along with a script to check
     SPDX tags.

   - Work to fix dangling references to documentation files; this
     involved a fair number of one-liner comment changes outside of
     Documentation/

  ... and the usual list of documentation improvements, typo fixes, etc"

* tag 'docs-4.18' of git://git.lwn.net/linux: (103 commits)
  Documentation: document hung_task_panic kernel parameter
  docs/admin-guide/mm: add high level concepts overview
  docs/vm: move ksm and transhuge from "user" to "internals" section.
  docs: Use the kerneldoc comments for memalloc_no*()
  doc: document scope NOFS, NOIO APIs
  docs: update kernel versions and dates in tables
  docs/vm: transhuge: split userspace bits to admin-guide/mm/transhuge
  docs/vm: transhuge: minor updates
  docs/vm: transhuge: change sections order
  Documentation: arm: clean up Marvell Berlin family info
  Documentation: gpio: driver: Fix a typo and some odd grammar
  docs: ranoops.rst: fix location of ramoops.txt
  scripts/documentation-file-ref-check: rewrite it in perl with auto-fix mode
  docs: uio-howto.rst: use a code block to solve a warning
  mm, THP, doc: Add document for thp_swpout/thp_swpout_fallback
  w1: w1_io.c: fix a kernel-doc warning
  Documentation/process/posting: wrap text at 80 cols
  docs: admin-guide: add cgroup-v2 documentation
  Revert "Documentation/features/vm: Remove arch support status file for 'pte_special'"
  Documentation: refcount-vs-atomic: Update reference to LKMM doc.
  ...

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst b/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst
index c209d70da66f..c418c5d6cae4 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst
@@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ of conventions and procedures which are used in the posting of patches;
 following them will make life much easier for everybody involved.  This
 document will attempt to cover these expectations in reasonable detail;
 more information can also be found in the files process/submitting-patches.rst,
-process/submitting-drivers.rst, and process/submit-checklist.rst in the kernel documentation
-directory.
+process/submitting-drivers.rst, and process/submit-checklist.rst in the kernel
+documentation directory.
 
 
 When to post
@@ -198,8 +198,8 @@ pass it to diff with the "-X" option.
 
 The tags mentioned above are used to describe how various developers have
 been associated with the development of this patch.  They are described in
-detail in the process/submitting-patches.rst document; what follows here is a brief
-summary.  Each of these lines has the format:
+detail in the process/submitting-patches.rst document; what follows here is a
+brief summary.  Each of these lines has the format:
 
 ::
 
@@ -210,8 +210,8 @@ The tags in common use are:
  - Signed-off-by: this is a developer's certification that he or she has
    the right to submit the patch for inclusion into the kernel.  It is an
    agreement to the Developer's Certificate of Origin, the full text of
-   which can be found in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst.  Code without a
-   proper signoff cannot be merged into the mainline.
+   which can be found in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst.  Code
+   without a proper signoff cannot be merged into the mainline.
 
  - Co-developed-by: states that the patch was also created by another developer
    along with the original author.  This is useful at times when multiple
@@ -226,8 +226,8 @@ The tags in common use are:
    it to work.
 
  - Reviewed-by: the named developer has reviewed the patch for correctness;
-   see the reviewer's statement in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for more
-   detail.
+   see the reviewer's statement in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
+   for more detail.
 
  - Reported-by: names a user who reported a problem which is fixed by this
    patch; this tag is used to give credit to the (often underappreciated)