diff options
author | Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> | 2011-10-21 22:25:53 +0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> | 2012-01-03 12:09:59 +0400 |
commit | 3712a3c488987849613a4ad74129e67e40b12b38 (patch) | |
tree | c3b155ed171bb0542d6ea4b18dcfc3d279ee610f /Documentation/pinctrl.txt | |
parent | d2f6a1c6fb0e510a24ccac066eefbcfd0c932858 (diff) | |
download | linux-3712a3c488987849613a4ad74129e67e40b12b38.tar.xz |
pinctrl: add explicit gpio_disable_free pinmux_op
Some pinctrl drivers (Tegra at least) program a pin to be a GPIO in a
completely different manner than they select which function to mux out of
that pin. In order to support a single "free" pinmux_op, the driver would
need to maintain a per-pin state of requested-for-gpio vs. requested-for-
function. However, that's a lot of work when the core already has explicit
separate paths for gpio request/free and function request/free.
So, add a gpio_disable_free op to struct pinmux_ops, and make pin_free()
call it when appropriate.
When doing this, I noticed that when calling pin_request():
!!gpio == (gpio_range != NULL)
... and so I collapsed those two parameters in both pin_request(), and
when adding writing the new code in pin_free().
Also, for pin_free():
!!free_func == (gpio_range != NULL)
However, I didn't want pin_free() to know about the GPIO function naming
special case, so instead, I reworked pin_free() to always return the pin's
previously requested function, and now pinmux_free_gpio() calls
kfree(function). This is much more balanced with the allocation having
been performed in pinmux_request_gpio().
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/pinctrl.txt')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions