docs: fix locations of several documents that got moved

The previous patch renamed several files that are cross-referenced
along the Kernel documentation. Adjust the links to point to
the right places.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>

3 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/networking/netconsole.txt b/Documentation/networking/netconsole.txt
index 30409a36e95d..296ea00fd3eb 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/netconsole.txt
+++ b/Documentation/networking/netconsole.txt
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ priority messages to the console. You can change this at runtime using:
 or by specifying "debug" on the kernel command line at boot, to send
 all kernel messages to the console. A specific value for this parameter
 can also be set using the "loglevel" kernel boot option. See the
-dmesg(8) man page and Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt for details.
+dmesg(8) man page and Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.rst for details.
 
 Netconsole was designed to be as instantaneous as possible, to
 enable the logging of even the most critical kernel bugs. It works
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt b/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt
index 0fe1c6e0dbcd..cdebc5c8705f 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt
+++ b/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt
@@ -136,14 +136,14 @@ A: Normally Greg Kroah-Hartman collects stable commits himself, but
 
 Q: I see a network patch and I think it should be backported to stable.
    Should I request it via "stable@vger.kernel.org" like the references in
-   the kernel's Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt file say?
+   the kernel's Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst file say?
 
 A: No, not for networking.  Check the stable queues as per above 1st to see
    if it is already queued.  If not, then send a mail to netdev, listing
    the upstream commit ID and why you think it should be a stable candidate.
 
    Before you jump to go do the above, do note that the normal stable rules
-   in Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt still apply.  So you need to
+   in Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst still apply.  So you need to
    explicitly indicate why it is a critical fix and exactly what users are
    impacted.  In addition, you need to convince yourself that you _really_
    think it has been overlooked, vs. having been considered and rejected.
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ A: No.  See above answer.  In short, if you think it really belongs in
 
    If you think there is some valid information relating to it being in
    stable that does _not_ belong in the commit log, then use the three
-   dash marker line as described in Documentation/SubmittingPatches to
+   dash marker line as described in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst to
    temporarily embed that information into the patch that you send.
 
 Q: Someone said that the comment style and coding convention is different
@@ -220,5 +220,5 @@ A: Attention to detail.  Re-read your own work as if you were the
    If it is your first patch, mail it to yourself so you can test apply
    it to an unpatched tree to confirm infrastructure didn't mangle it.
 
-   Finally, go back and read Documentation/SubmittingPatches to be
+   Finally, go back and read Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst to be
    sure you are not repeating some common mistake documented there.
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/vortex.txt b/Documentation/networking/vortex.txt
index 97282da82b75..ad3dead052a4 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/vortex.txt
+++ b/Documentation/networking/vortex.txt
@@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ steps you should take:
 
 - The contents of your report will vary a lot depending upon the
   problem.  If it's a kernel crash then you should refer to the
-  REPORTING-BUGS file.
+  admin-guide/reporting-bugs.rst file.
 
   But for most problems it is useful to provide the following: