diff options
author | Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> | 2023-05-15 17:35:36 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> | 2023-06-20 02:19:35 +0300 |
commit | c1753fd02a0058ea43cbb31ab26d25be2f6cfe08 (patch) | |
tree | db0a249000b5cc954e42c66aae610dc24eb3ef8d /Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst | |
parent | 025b7799b35d32e46988ba0614ea2f91b85d6375 (diff) | |
download | linux-c1753fd02a0058ea43cbb31ab26d25be2f6cfe08.tar.xz |
mm: move mm_count into its own cache line
The mm_struct mm_count field is frequently updated by mmgrab/mmdrop
performed by context switch. This causes false-sharing for surrounding
mm_struct fields which are read-mostly.
This has been observed on a 2sockets/112core/224cpu Intel Sapphire Rapids
server running hackbench, and by the kernel test robot will-it-scale
testcase.
Move the mm_count field into its own cache line to prevent false-sharing
with other mm_struct fields.
Move mm_count to the first field of mm_struct to minimize the amount of
padding required: rather than adding padding before and after the mm_count
field, padding is only added after mm_count.
Note that I noticed this odd comment in mm_struct:
commit 2e3025434a6b ("mm: relocate 'write_protect_seq' in struct mm_struct")
/*
* With some kernel config, the current mmap_lock's offset
* inside 'mm_struct' is at 0x120, which is very optimal, as
* its two hot fields 'count' and 'owner' sit in 2 different
* cachelines, and when mmap_lock is highly contended, both
* of the 2 fields will be accessed frequently, current layout
* will help to reduce cache bouncing.
*
* So please be careful with adding new fields before
* mmap_lock, which can easily push the 2 fields into one
* cacheline.
*/
struct rw_semaphore mmap_lock;
This comment is rather odd for a few reasons:
- It requires addition/removal of mm_struct fields to carefully consider
field alignment of _other_ fields,
- It expresses the wish to keep an "optimal" alignment for a specific
kernel config.
I suspect that the author of this comment may want to revisit this topic
and perhaps introduce a split-struct approach for struct rw_semaphore,
if the need is to place various fields of this structure in different
cache lines.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230515143536.114960-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
Fixes: 223baf9d17f2 ("sched: Fix performance regression introduced by mm_cid")
Fixes: af7f588d8f73 ("sched: Introduce per-memory-map concurrency ID")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7a0c1db1-103d-d518-ed96-1584a28fbf32@efficios.com
Reported-by: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202305151017.27581d75-yujie.liu@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Olivier Dion <odion@efficios.com>
Cc: <michael.christie@oracle.com>
Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/mm/damon/design.rst')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions