Merge branch 'core-rcu-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull RCU changes from Ingo Molar:
 "The main changes:

   - torture-test updates
   - callback-offloading changes
   - maintainership changes
   - update RCU documentation
   - miscellaneous fixes"

* 'core-rcu-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (32 commits)
  rcu: Allow for NULL tick_nohz_full_mask when nohz_full= missing
  rcu: Fix a sparse warning in rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp()
  rcu: Fix a sparse warning in rcu_initiate_boost()
  rcu: Fix __rcu_reclaim() to use true/false for bool
  rcu: Remove CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_DELAY
  rcu: Use __this_cpu_read() instead of per_cpu_ptr()
  rcu: Don't use NMIs to dump other CPUs' stacks
  rcu: Bind grace-period kthreads to non-NO_HZ_FULL CPUs
  rcu: Simplify priority boosting by putting rt_mutex in rcu_node
  rcu: Check both root and current rcu_node when setting up future grace period
  rcu: Allow post-unlock reference for rt_mutex
  rcu: Loosen __call_rcu()'s rcu_head alignment constraint
  rcu: Eliminate read-modify-write ACCESS_ONCE() calls
  rcu: Remove redundant ACCESS_ONCE() from tick_do_timer_cpu
  rcu: Make rcu node arrays static const char * const
  signal: Explain local_irq_save() call
  rcu: Handle obsolete references to TINY_PREEMPT_RCU
  rcu: Document deadlock-avoidance information for rcu_read_unlock()
  scripts: Teach get_maintainer.pl about the new "R:" tag
  rcu: Update rcu torture maintainership filename patterns
  ...

1 files changed, 23 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
index f1dc4a215593..a4de88fb55f0 100644
--- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
@@ -757,10 +757,14 @@ SMP BARRIER PAIRING
 When dealing with CPU-CPU interactions, certain types of memory barrier should
 always be paired.  A lack of appropriate pairing is almost certainly an error.
 
-A write barrier should always be paired with a data dependency barrier or read
-barrier, though a general barrier would also be viable.  Similarly a read
-barrier or a data dependency barrier should always be paired with at least an
-write barrier, though, again, a general barrier is viable:
+General barriers pair with each other, though they also pair with
+most other types of barriers, albeit without transitivity.  An acquire
+barrier pairs with a release barrier, but both may also pair with other
+barriers, including of course general barriers.  A write barrier pairs
+with a data dependency barrier, an acquire barrier, a release barrier,
+a read barrier, or a general barrier.  Similarly a read barrier or a
+data dependency barrier pairs with a write barrier, an acquire barrier,
+a release barrier, or a general barrier:
 
 	CPU 1		      CPU 2
 	===============	      ===============
@@ -1893,6 +1897,21 @@ between the STORE to indicate the event and the STORE to set TASK_RUNNING:
 	    <general barrier>		  STORE current->state
 	LOAD event_indicated
 
+To repeat, this write memory barrier is present if and only if something
+is actually awakened.  To see this, consider the following sequence of
+events, where X and Y are both initially zero:
+
+	CPU 1				CPU 2
+	===============================	===============================
+	X = 1;				STORE event_indicated
+	smp_mb();			wake_up();
+	Y = 1;				wait_event(wq, Y == 1);
+	wake_up();			  load from Y sees 1, no memory barrier
+					load from X might see 0
+
+In contrast, if a wakeup does occur, CPU 2's load from X would be guaranteed
+to see 1.
+
 The available waker functions include:
 
 	complete();