diff options
| author | Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> | 2014-04-01 19:08:42 +0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> | 2014-04-01 19:08:42 +0400 |
| commit | 520c8b16505236fc82daa352e6c5e73cd9870cff (patch) | |
| tree | e61b78440874e083928821423e226c0ecc2d6647 /Documentation/filesystems/Locking | |
| parent | bc27027a73e8b80376b51a1583ad1c7445605e8a (diff) | |
| download | linux-520c8b16505236fc82daa352e6c5e73cd9870cff.tar.xz | |
vfs: add renameat2 syscall
Add new renameat2 syscall, which is the same as renameat with an added
flags argument.
Pass flags to vfs_rename() and to i_op->rename() as well.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/filesystems/Locking')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/filesystems/Locking | 6 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/Locking b/Documentation/filesystems/Locking index 5b0c083d7c0e..f424e0e5b46b 100644 --- a/Documentation/filesystems/Locking +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/Locking @@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ prototypes: int (*mknod) (struct inode *,struct dentry *,umode_t,dev_t); int (*rename) (struct inode *, struct dentry *, struct inode *, struct dentry *); + int (*rename2) (struct inode *, struct dentry *, + struct inode *, struct dentry *, unsigned int); int (*readlink) (struct dentry *, char __user *,int); void * (*follow_link) (struct dentry *, struct nameidata *); void (*put_link) (struct dentry *, struct nameidata *, void *); @@ -78,6 +80,7 @@ mkdir: yes unlink: yes (both) rmdir: yes (both) (see below) rename: yes (all) (see below) +rename2: yes (all) (see below) readlink: no follow_link: no put_link: no @@ -96,7 +99,8 @@ tmpfile: no Additionally, ->rmdir(), ->unlink() and ->rename() have ->i_mutex on victim. - cross-directory ->rename() has (per-superblock) ->s_vfs_rename_sem. + cross-directory ->rename() and rename2() has (per-superblock) +->s_vfs_rename_sem. See Documentation/filesystems/directory-locking for more detailed discussion of the locking scheme for directory operations. |