summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>2010-01-26 17:30:06 +0300
committerMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>2010-03-01 18:36:12 +0300
commitdb358796d95886f9715d1c91e9ae866c005511d7 (patch)
tree0cf30caa5d44b1fbfe505dfbf1c8fb246a23fb53 /Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
parentd380a5e4022a5c63a6c5ac631e48c752ba7f1e4f (diff)
downloadlinux-db358796d95886f9715d1c91e9ae866c005511d7.tar.xz
KVM: Plan obsolescence of kernel allocated slots, paravirt mmu
These features are unused by modern userspace and can go away. Paravirt mmu needs to stay a little longer for live migration. Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt30
1 files changed, 30 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
index ea401495528d..db205276bb53 100644
--- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
+++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
@@ -538,3 +538,33 @@ Why: Duplicate functionality with the gspca_zc3xx driver, zc0301 only
sensors) wich are also supported by the gspca_zc3xx driver
(which supports 53 USB-ID's in total)
Who: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
+
+----------------------------
+
+What: KVM memory aliases support
+When: July 2010
+Why: Memory aliasing support is used for speeding up guest vga access
+ through the vga windows.
+
+ Modern userspace no longer uses this feature, so it's just bitrotted
+ code and can be removed with no impact.
+Who: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
+
+----------------------------
+
+What: KVM kernel-allocated memory slots
+When: July 2010
+Why: Since 2.6.25, kvm supports user-allocated memory slots, which are
+ much more flexible than kernel-allocated slots. All current userspace
+ supports the newer interface and this code can be removed with no
+ impact.
+Who: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
+
+----------------------------
+
+What: KVM paravirt mmu host support
+When: January 2011
+Why: The paravirt mmu host support is slower than non-paravirt mmu, both
+ on newer and older hardware. It is already not exposed to the guest,
+ and kept only for live migration purposes.
+Who: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>