Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next-queued

Some DSI and VBT pending patches from Hans will apply
cleanly and with less ugly conflicts if they are rebuilt
on top of other patches that recently landed on drm-next.

Reference: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/70952/
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com

4 files changed, 55 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst
index 2ff743105927..871922529332 100644
--- a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst
+++ b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/driver.rst
@@ -507,11 +507,6 @@ available but we try to move away from this:
   cascaded irq has to be handled by a threaded interrupt handler.
   Apart from that it works exactly like the chained irqchip.
 
-- DEPRECATED: gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip(): sets up a chained cascaded irq
-  handler for a gpio_chip from a parent IRQ and passes the struct gpio_chip*
-  as handler data. Notice that we pass is as the handler data, since the
-  irqchip data is likely used by the parent irqchip.
-
 - gpiochip_set_nested_irqchip(): sets up a nested cascaded irq handler for a
   gpio_chip from a parent IRQ. As the parent IRQ has usually been
   explicitly requested by the driver, this does very little more than
diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/drivers-on-gpio.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/drivers-on-gpio.rst
index f3a189320e11..820b403d50f6 100644
--- a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/drivers-on-gpio.rst
+++ b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/drivers-on-gpio.rst
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ to emulate MCTRL (modem control) signals CTS/RTS by using two GPIO lines. The
 MTD NOR flash has add-ons for extra GPIO lines too, though the address bus is
 usually connected directly to the flash.
 
-Use those instead of talking directly to the GPIOs using sysfs; they integrate
-with kernel frameworks better than your userspace code could. Needless to say,
-just using the appropriate kernel drivers will simplify and speed up your
-embedded hacking in particular by providing ready-made components.
+Use those instead of talking directly to the GPIOs from userspace; they
+integrate with kernel frameworks better than your userspace code could.
+Needless to say, just using the appropriate kernel drivers will simplify and
+speed up your embedded hacking in particular by providing ready-made components.
diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/index.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/index.rst
index 5b61032aa4ea..1d48fe248f05 100644
--- a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/index.rst
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ Contents:
    :maxdepth: 2
 
    intro
+   using-gpio
    driver
    consumer
    board
diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/using-gpio.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/using-gpio.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..dda069444032
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/driver-api/gpio/using-gpio.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+=========================
+Using GPIO Lines in Linux
+=========================
+
+The Linux kernel exists to abstract and present hardware to users. GPIO lines
+as such are normally not user facing abstractions. The most obvious, natural
+and preferred way to use GPIO lines is to let kernel hardware drivers deal
+with them.
+
+For examples of already existing generic drivers that will also be good
+examples for any other kernel drivers you want to author, refer to
+:doc:`drivers-on-gpio`
+
+For any kind of mass produced system you want to support, such as servers,
+laptops, phones, tablets, routers, and any consumer or office or business goods
+using appropriate kernel drivers is paramount. Submit your code for inclusion
+in the upstream Linux kernel when you feel it is mature enough and you will get
+help to refine it, see :doc:`../../process/submitting-patches`.
+
+In Linux GPIO lines also have a userspace ABI.
+
+The userspace ABI is intended for one-off deployments. Examples are prototypes,
+factory lines, maker community projects, workshop specimen, production tools,
+industrial automation, PLC-type use cases, door controllers, in short a piece
+of specialized equipment that is not produced by the numbers, requiring
+operators to have a deep knowledge of the equipment and knows about the
+software-hardware interface to be set up. They should not have a natural fit
+to any existing kernel subsystem and not be a good fit for an operating system,
+because of not being reusable or abstract enough, or involving a lot of non
+computer hardware related policy.
+
+Applications that have a good reason to use the industrial I/O (IIO) subsystem
+from userspace will likely be a good fit for using GPIO lines from userspace as
+well.
+
+Do not under any circumstances abuse the GPIO userspace ABI to cut corners in
+any product development projects. If you use it for prototyping, then do not
+productify the prototype: rewrite it using proper kernel drivers. Do not under
+any circumstances deploy any uniform products using GPIO from userspace.
+
+The userspace ABI is a character device for each GPIO hardware unit (GPIO chip).
+These devices will appear on the system as ``/dev/gpiochip0`` thru
+``/dev/gpiochipN``. Examples of how to directly use the userspace ABI can be
+found in the kernel tree ``tools/gpio`` subdirectory.
+
+For structured and managed applications, we recommend that you make use of the
+libgpiod_ library. This provides helper abstractions, command line utlities
+and arbitration for multiple simultaneous consumers on the same GPIO chip.
+
+.. _libgpiod: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/libgpiod/libgpiod.git/