docs: arm: convert docs to ReST and rename to *.rst

Converts ARM the text files to ReST, preparing them to be an
architecture book.

The conversion is actually:
  - add blank lines and identation in order to identify paragraphs;
  - fix tables markups;
  - add some lists markups;
  - mark literal blocks;
  - adjust title markups.

At its new index.rst, let's add a :orphan: while this is not linked to
the main index.rst file, in order to avoid build warnings.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> # For sun4i-ss

1 files changed, 32 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/arm/nwfpe/notes.rst b/Documentation/arm/nwfpe/notes.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..102e55af8439
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/arm/nwfpe/notes.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+Notes
+=====
+
+There seems to be a problem with exp(double) and our emulator.  I haven't
+been able to track it down yet.  This does not occur with the emulator
+supplied by Russell King.
+
+I also found one oddity in the emulator.  I don't think it is serious but
+will point it out.  The ARM calling conventions require floating point
+registers f4-f7 to be preserved over a function call.  The compiler quite
+often uses an stfe instruction to save f4 on the stack upon entry to a
+function, and an ldfe instruction to restore it before returning.
+
+I was looking at some code, that calculated a double result, stored it in f4
+then made a function call. Upon return from the function call the number in
+f4 had been converted to an extended value in the emulator.
+
+This is a side effect of the stfe instruction.  The double in f4 had to be
+converted to extended, then stored.  If an lfm/sfm combination had been used,
+then no conversion would occur.  This has performance considerations.  The
+result from the function call and f4 were used in a multiplication.  If the
+emulator sees a multiply of a double and extended, it promotes the double to
+extended, then does the multiply in extended precision.
+
+This code will cause this problem:
+
+double x, y, z;
+z = log(x)/log(y);
+
+The result of log(x) (a double) will be calculated, returned in f0, then
+moved to f4 to preserve it over the log(y) call.  The division will be done
+in extended precision, due to the stfe instruction used to save f4 in log(y).