diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2024-01-09 00:27:43 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2024-01-09 00:27:43 +0300 |
commit | 41a80ca4ae2de711e04b399f614f676daf72d938 (patch) | |
tree | 8a51536412e757792e331dfd7362e346bd3a87b5 /Documentation/arch | |
parent | 6e0b939180fcd2658d2eb8e5bfa4192d1bc32fad (diff) | |
parent | f789383fa34a266d0c1a76f272043a15a8edf733 (diff) | |
download | linux-41a80ca4ae2de711e04b399f614f676daf72d938.tar.xz |
Merge tag 'x86_misc_for_v6.8' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull misc x86 updates from Borislav Petkov:
- Add an informational message which gets issued when IA32 emulation
has been disabled on the cmdline
- Clarify in detail how /proc/cpuinfo is used on x86
- Fix a theoretical overflow in num_digits()
* tag 'x86_misc_for_v6.8' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
x86/ia32: State that IA32 emulation is disabled
Documentation/x86: Document what /proc/cpuinfo is for
x86/lib: Fix overflow when counting digits
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/arch')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/arch/x86/cpuinfo.rst | 89 |
1 files changed, 68 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/arch/x86/cpuinfo.rst b/Documentation/arch/x86/cpuinfo.rst index 08246e8ac835..8895784d4784 100644 --- a/Documentation/arch/x86/cpuinfo.rst +++ b/Documentation/arch/x86/cpuinfo.rst @@ -7,27 +7,74 @@ x86 Feature Flags Introduction ============ -On x86, flags appearing in /proc/cpuinfo have an X86_FEATURE definition -in arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h. If the kernel cares about a feature -or KVM want to expose the feature to a KVM guest, it can and should have -an X86_FEATURE_* defined. These flags represent hardware features as -well as software features. - -If users want to know if a feature is available on a given system, they -try to find the flag in /proc/cpuinfo. If a given flag is present, it -means that the kernel supports it and is currently making it available. -If such flag represents a hardware feature, it also means that the -hardware supports it. - -If the expected flag does not appear in /proc/cpuinfo, things are murkier. -Users need to find out the reason why the flag is missing and find the way -how to enable it, which is not always easy. There are several factors that -can explain missing flags: the expected feature failed to enable, the feature -is missing in hardware, platform firmware did not enable it, the feature is -disabled at build or run time, an old kernel is in use, or the kernel does -not support the feature and thus has not enabled it. In general, /proc/cpuinfo -shows features which the kernel supports. For a full list of CPUID flags -which the CPU supports, use tools/arch/x86/kcpuid. +The list of feature flags in /proc/cpuinfo is not complete and +represents an ill-fated attempt from long time ago to put feature flags +in an easy to find place for userspace. + +However, the amount of feature flags is growing by the CPU generation, +leading to unparseable and unwieldy /proc/cpuinfo. + +What is more, those feature flags do not even need to be in that file +because userspace doesn't care about them - glibc et al already use +CPUID to find out what the target machine supports and what not. + +And even if it doesn't show a particular feature flag - although the CPU +still does have support for the respective hardware functionality and +said CPU supports CPUID faulting - userspace can simply probe for the +feature and figure out if it is supported or not, regardless of whether +it is being advertised somewhere. + +Furthermore, those flag strings become an ABI the moment they appear +there and maintaining them forever when nothing even uses them is a lot +of wasted effort. + +So, the current use of /proc/cpuinfo is to show features which the +kernel has *enabled* and *supports*. As in: the CPUID feature flag is +there, there's an additional setup which the kernel has done while +booting and the functionality is ready to use. A perfect example for +that is "user_shstk" where additional code enablement is present in the +kernel to support shadow stack for user programs. + +So, if users want to know if a feature is available on a given system, +they try to find the flag in /proc/cpuinfo. If a given flag is present, +it means that + +* the kernel knows about the feature enough to have an X86_FEATURE bit + +* the kernel supports it and is currently making it available either to + userspace or some other part of the kernel + +* if the flag represents a hardware feature the hardware supports it. + +The absence of a flag in /proc/cpuinfo by itself means almost nothing to +an end user. + +On the one hand, a feature like "vaes" might be fully available to user +applications on a kernel that has not defined X86_FEATURE_VAES and thus +there is no "vaes" in /proc/cpuinfo. + +On the other hand, a new kernel running on non-VAES hardware would also +have no "vaes" in /proc/cpuinfo. There's no way for an application or +user to tell the difference. + +The end result is that the flags field in /proc/cpuinfo is marginally +useful for kernel debugging, but not really for anything else. +Applications should instead use things like the glibc facilities for +querying CPU support. Users should rely on tools like +tools/arch/x86/kcpuid and cpuid(1). + +Regarding implementation, flags appearing in /proc/cpuinfo have an +X86_FEATURE definition in arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h. These flags +represent hardware features as well as software features. + +If the kernel cares about a feature or KVM want to expose the feature to +a KVM guest, it should only then expose it to the guest when the guest +needs to parse /proc/cpuinfo. Which, as mentioned above, is highly +unlikely. KVM can synthesize the CPUID bit and the KVM guest can simply +query CPUID and figure out what the hypervisor supports and what not. As +already stated, /proc/cpuinfo is not a dumping ground for useless +feature flags. + How are feature flags created? ============================== |