summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGuchun Chen <guchun.chen@amd.com>2020-07-27 10:51:05 +0300
committerAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>2020-08-05 00:27:25 +0300
commit9b856defbe355f886f99777e667506841bd267a8 (patch)
tree6829696cffe59be891874be7729d53a91edf3cce
parenta219ecbb83859940bd1959180bd555f28f2043a7 (diff)
downloadlinux-9b856defbe355f886f99777e667506841bd267a8.tar.xz
drm/amdgpu: update eeprom once specifying one bigger threshold(v3)
During driver's probe, when it hits bad gpu tag in eeprom i2c init calling(the tag was set when reported bad page reaches bad page threshold in last driver's working loop), there are some strategys to deal with the cases: 1. when the module parameter amdgpu_bad_page_threshold = 0, that means page retirement feature is disabled, so just resetting the eeprom is fine. 2. When amdgpu_bad_page_threshold is not 0, and moreover, user sets one bigger valid data in order to make current boot up succeeds, correct eeprom header tag and do not break booting. 3. For other cases, driver's probe will be broken. v2: Just update eeprom header tag instead of resetting the whole table header when user sets one bigger threshold data. v3: Use dev_info/dev_err to print PCI device information, which helps in mGPU case. Signed-off-by: Guchun Chen <guchun.chen@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c30
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
index 7848a426c95b..e5e3ed113d63 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c
@@ -216,6 +216,24 @@ static bool __validate_tbl_checksum(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control,
return true;
}
+static int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_correct_header_tag(
+ struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control,
+ uint32_t header)
+{
+ unsigned char buff[EEPROM_ADDRESS_SIZE + EEPROM_TABLE_HEADER_SIZE];
+ struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_table_header *hdr = &control->tbl_hdr;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ memset(buff, 0, EEPROM_ADDRESS_SIZE + EEPROM_TABLE_HEADER_SIZE);
+
+ mutex_lock(&control->tbl_mutex);
+ hdr->header = header;
+ ret = __update_table_header(control, buff);
+ mutex_unlock(&control->tbl_mutex);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_reset_table(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control)
{
unsigned char buff[EEPROM_ADDRESS_SIZE + EEPROM_TABLE_HEADER_SIZE] = { 0 };
@@ -248,6 +266,7 @@ int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_init(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control,
struct amdgpu_device *adev = to_amdgpu_device(control);
unsigned char buff[EEPROM_ADDRESS_SIZE + EEPROM_TABLE_HEADER_SIZE] = { 0 };
struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_table_header *hdr = &control->tbl_hdr;
+ struct amdgpu_ras *ras = amdgpu_ras_get_context(adev);
struct i2c_msg msg = {
.addr = 0,
.flags = I2C_M_RD,
@@ -287,9 +306,16 @@ int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_init(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control,
} else if ((hdr->header == EEPROM_TABLE_HDR_BAD) &&
(amdgpu_bad_page_threshold != 0)) {
- *exceed_err_limit = true;
- dev_err(adev->dev, "Exceeding the bad_page_threshold parameter, "
+ if (ras->bad_page_cnt_threshold > control->num_recs) {
+ dev_info(adev->dev, "Using one valid bigger bad page "
+ "threshold and correcting eeprom header tag.\n");
+ ret = amdgpu_ras_eeprom_correct_header_tag(control,
+ EEPROM_TABLE_HDR_VAL);
+ } else {
+ *exceed_err_limit = true;
+ dev_err(adev->dev, "Exceeding the bad_page_threshold parameter, "
"disabling the GPU.\n");
+ }
} else {
DRM_INFO("Creating new EEPROM table");