diff options
| author | stephen hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com> | 2012-02-24 12:08:20 +0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2012-02-25 02:41:11 +0400 |
| commit | bff528578fc3c4a14227b052a313109b5ffb73da (patch) | |
| tree | 3a8a383ac300e6d864524bd20c248132bb3eb798 | |
| parent | 5d69703263d588dbb03f4e57091afd8942d96e6d (diff) | |
| download | linux-bff528578fc3c4a14227b052a313109b5ffb73da.tar.xz | |
gre: fix spelling in comments
The original spelling and bad word choice makes these comments hard to read.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
| -rw-r--r-- | net/ipv4/ip_gre.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_gre.c b/net/ipv4/ip_gre.c index 6b3ca5ba4450..38673d2860e2 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/ip_gre.c +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_gre.c @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ it is infeasible task. The most general solutions would be to keep skb->encapsulation counter (sort of local ttl), and silently drop packet when it expires. It is a good - solution, but it supposes maintaing new variable in ALL + solution, but it supposes maintaining new variable in ALL skb, even if no tunneling is used. Current solution: xmit_recursion breaks dead loops. This is a percpu @@ -91,14 +91,14 @@ One of them is to parse packet trying to detect inner encapsulation made by our node. It is difficult or even impossible, especially, - taking into account fragmentation. TO be short, tt is not solution at all. + taking into account fragmentation. TO be short, ttl is not solution at all. Current solution: The solution was UNEXPECTEDLY SIMPLE. We force DF flag on tunnels with preconfigured hop limit, that is ALL. :-) Well, it does not remove the problem completely, but exponential growth of network traffic is changed to linear (branches, that exceed pmtu are pruned) and tunnel mtu - fastly degrades to value <68, where looping stops. + rapidly degrades to value <68, where looping stops. Yes, it is not good if there exists a router in the loop, which does not force DF, even when encapsulating packets have DF set. But it is not our problem! Nobody could accuse us, we made @@ -457,8 +457,8 @@ static void ipgre_err(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 info) GRE tunnels with enabled checksum. Tell them "thank you". Well, I wonder, rfc1812 was written by Cisco employee, - what the hell these idiots break standrads established - by themself??? + what the hell these idiots break standards established + by themselves??? */ const struct iphdr *iph = (const struct iphdr *)skb->data; |