diff options
author | Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> | 2009-09-24 02:56:36 +0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2009-09-24 18:20:59 +0400 |
commit | 296c81d89f4f14269f7346f81442910158c0a83a (patch) | |
tree | cf0e1facd1fed8282c1885bc4126e7bca1928712 | |
parent | a6df63615b943dbef22df04c19f4506330fe835e (diff) | |
download | linux-296c81d89f4f14269f7346f81442910158c0a83a.tar.xz |
memory controller: soft limit interface
Add an interface to allow get/set of soft limits. Soft limits for memory
plus swap controller (memsw) is currently not supported. Resource
counters have been enhanced to support soft limits and new type
RES_SOFT_LIMIT has been added. Unlike hard limits, soft limits can be
directly set and do not need any reclaim or checks before setting them to
a newer value.
Kamezawa-San raised a question as to whether soft limit should belong to
res_counter. Since all resources understand the basic concepts of hard
and soft limits, it is justified to add soft limits here. Soft limits are
a generic resource usage feature, even file system quotas support soft
limits.
Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-rw-r--r-- | include/linux/res_counter.h | 58 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/res_counter.c | 3 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | mm/memcontrol.c | 20 |
3 files changed, 81 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/res_counter.h b/include/linux/res_counter.h index 511f42fc6816..fcb9884df618 100644 --- a/include/linux/res_counter.h +++ b/include/linux/res_counter.h @@ -35,6 +35,10 @@ struct res_counter { */ unsigned long long limit; /* + * the limit that usage can be exceed + */ + unsigned long long soft_limit; + /* * the number of unsuccessful attempts to consume the resource */ unsigned long long failcnt; @@ -87,6 +91,7 @@ enum { RES_MAX_USAGE, RES_LIMIT, RES_FAILCNT, + RES_SOFT_LIMIT, }; /* @@ -132,6 +137,36 @@ static inline bool res_counter_limit_check_locked(struct res_counter *cnt) return false; } +static inline bool res_counter_soft_limit_check_locked(struct res_counter *cnt) +{ + if (cnt->usage < cnt->soft_limit) + return true; + + return false; +} + +/** + * Get the difference between the usage and the soft limit + * @cnt: The counter + * + * Returns 0 if usage is less than or equal to soft limit + * The difference between usage and soft limit, otherwise. + */ +static inline unsigned long long +res_counter_soft_limit_excess(struct res_counter *cnt) +{ + unsigned long long excess; + unsigned long flags; + + spin_lock_irqsave(&cnt->lock, flags); + if (cnt->usage <= cnt->soft_limit) + excess = 0; + else + excess = cnt->usage - cnt->soft_limit; + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cnt->lock, flags); + return excess; +} + /* * Helper function to detect if the cgroup is within it's limit or * not. It's currently called from cgroup_rss_prepare() @@ -147,6 +182,17 @@ static inline bool res_counter_check_under_limit(struct res_counter *cnt) return ret; } +static inline bool res_counter_check_under_soft_limit(struct res_counter *cnt) +{ + bool ret; + unsigned long flags; + + spin_lock_irqsave(&cnt->lock, flags); + ret = res_counter_soft_limit_check_locked(cnt); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cnt->lock, flags); + return ret; +} + static inline void res_counter_reset_max(struct res_counter *cnt) { unsigned long flags; @@ -180,4 +226,16 @@ static inline int res_counter_set_limit(struct res_counter *cnt, return ret; } +static inline int +res_counter_set_soft_limit(struct res_counter *cnt, + unsigned long long soft_limit) +{ + unsigned long flags; + + spin_lock_irqsave(&cnt->lock, flags); + cnt->soft_limit = soft_limit; + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cnt->lock, flags); + return 0; +} + #endif diff --git a/kernel/res_counter.c b/kernel/res_counter.c index e1338f074314..bcdabf37c40b 100644 --- a/kernel/res_counter.c +++ b/kernel/res_counter.c @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ void res_counter_init(struct res_counter *counter, struct res_counter *parent) { spin_lock_init(&counter->lock); counter->limit = RESOURCE_MAX; + counter->soft_limit = RESOURCE_MAX; counter->parent = parent; } @@ -101,6 +102,8 @@ res_counter_member(struct res_counter *counter, int member) return &counter->limit; case RES_FAILCNT: return &counter->failcnt; + case RES_SOFT_LIMIT: + return &counter->soft_limit; }; BUG(); diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index eb9571815f0c..4ad3e6be045d 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -2123,6 +2123,20 @@ static int mem_cgroup_write(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype *cft, else ret = mem_cgroup_resize_memsw_limit(memcg, val); break; + case RES_SOFT_LIMIT: + ret = res_counter_memparse_write_strategy(buffer, &val); + if (ret) + break; + /* + * For memsw, soft limits are hard to implement in terms + * of semantics, for now, we support soft limits for + * control without swap + */ + if (type == _MEM) + ret = res_counter_set_soft_limit(&memcg->res, val); + else + ret = -EINVAL; + break; default: ret = -EINVAL; /* should be BUG() ? */ break; @@ -2376,6 +2390,12 @@ static struct cftype mem_cgroup_files[] = { .read_u64 = mem_cgroup_read, }, { + .name = "soft_limit_in_bytes", + .private = MEMFILE_PRIVATE(_MEM, RES_SOFT_LIMIT), + .write_string = mem_cgroup_write, + .read_u64 = mem_cgroup_read, + }, + { .name = "failcnt", .private = MEMFILE_PRIVATE(_MEM, RES_FAILCNT), .trigger = mem_cgroup_reset, |