x.25 attempts to negotiate invalid throughput

The current X.25 code has some bugs in throughput negotiation:

   1. It does negotiation in all cases, usually there is no need
   2. It incorrectly attempts to negotiate the throughput class in one
      direction only.  There are separate throughput classes for input
      and output and if either is negotiated both mist be negotiates.

This is bug https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15681

This bug was first reported by Daniel Ferenci to the linux-x25 mailing
list on 6/8/2004, but is still present.

The current (2.6.34) x.25 code doesn't seem to know that the X.25
throughput facility includes two values, one for the required
throughput outbound, one for inbound.

This causes it to attempt to negotiate throughput 0x0A, which is
throughput 9600 inbound and the illegal value "0" for inbound
throughput.

Because of this some X.25 devices (e.g. Cisco 1600) refuse to connect
to Linux X.25.

The following patch fixes this behaviour.  Unless the user specifies a
required throughput it does not attempt to negotiate.  If the user
does not specify a throughput it accepts the suggestion of the remote
X.25 system.  If the user requests a throughput then it validates both
the input and output throughputs and correctly negotiates them with
the remote end.

Signed-off-by: John Hughes <john@calva.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

2 files changed, 28 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/net/x25/af_x25.c b/net/x25/af_x25.c
index fe26c01ef3e6..8ed51c926c50 100644
--- a/net/x25/af_x25.c
+++ b/net/x25/af_x25.c
@@ -588,7 +588,8 @@ static int x25_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol,
 	x25->facilities.winsize_out = X25_DEFAULT_WINDOW_SIZE;
 	x25->facilities.pacsize_in  = X25_DEFAULT_PACKET_SIZE;
 	x25->facilities.pacsize_out = X25_DEFAULT_PACKET_SIZE;
-	x25->facilities.throughput  = X25_DEFAULT_THROUGHPUT;
+	x25->facilities.throughput  = 0;	/* by default don't negotiate
+						   throughput */
 	x25->facilities.reverse     = X25_DEFAULT_REVERSE;
 	x25->dte_facilities.calling_len = 0;
 	x25->dte_facilities.called_len = 0;
@@ -1459,9 +1460,20 @@ static int x25_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
 			if (facilities.winsize_in < 1 ||
 			    facilities.winsize_in > 127)
 				break;
-			if (facilities.throughput < 0x03 ||
-			    facilities.throughput > 0xDD)
-				break;
+			if (facilities.throughput) {
+				int out = facilities.throughput & 0xf0;
+				int in  = facilities.throughput & 0x0f;
+				if (!out)
+					facilities.throughput |=
+						X25_DEFAULT_THROUGHPUT << 4;
+				else if (out < 0x30 || out > 0xD0)
+					break;
+				if (!in)
+					facilities.throughput |=
+						X25_DEFAULT_THROUGHPUT;
+				else if (in < 0x03 || in > 0x0D)
+					break;
+			}
 			if (facilities.reverse &&
 				(facilities.reverse & 0x81) != 0x81)
 				break;
diff --git a/net/x25/x25_facilities.c b/net/x25/x25_facilities.c
index a2765c6b1f1a..771bab00754b 100644
--- a/net/x25/x25_facilities.c
+++ b/net/x25/x25_facilities.c
@@ -269,9 +269,18 @@ int x25_negotiate_facilities(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk,
 	new->reverse = theirs.reverse;
 
 	if (theirs.throughput) {
-		if (theirs.throughput < ours->throughput) {
-			SOCK_DEBUG(sk, "X.25: throughput negotiated down\n");
-			new->throughput = theirs.throughput;
+		int theirs_in =  theirs.throughput & 0x0f;
+		int theirs_out = theirs.throughput & 0xf0;
+		int ours_in  = ours->throughput & 0x0f;
+		int ours_out = ours->throughput & 0xf0;
+		if (!ours_in || theirs_in < ours_in) {
+			SOCK_DEBUG(sk, "X.25: inbound throughput negotiated\n");
+			new->throughput = (new->throughput & 0xf0) | theirs_in;
+		}
+		if (!ours_out || theirs_out < ours_out) {
+			SOCK_DEBUG(sk,
+				"X.25: outbound throughput negotiated\n");
+			new->throughput = (new->throughput & 0x0f) | theirs_out;
 		}
 	}