summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>2019-02-23 01:36:04 +0300
committerDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>2019-02-23 02:07:47 +0300
commitf036ebd9bfbe1e91a3d855e85e05fc5ff156b641 (patch)
treeb676669c186253e4a40026c2f70da6b88b5bf933
parent71c190249f0ced5b26377ea6bf829ab3af77a40c (diff)
downloadlinux-f036ebd9bfbe1e91a3d855e85e05fc5ff156b641.tar.xz
nfp: bpf: fix ALU32 high bits clearance bug
NFP BPF JIT compiler is doing a couple of small optimizations when jitting ALU imm instructions, some of these optimizations could save code-gen, for example: A & -1 = A A | 0 = A A ^ 0 = A However, for ALU32, high 32-bit of the 64-bit register should still be cleared according to ISA semantics. Fixes: cd7df56ed3e6 ("nfp: add BPF to NFP code translator") Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c17
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c
index a09696540171..0a868c829b90 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c
@@ -1291,15 +1291,10 @@ wrp_alu64_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta,
static int
wrp_alu32_imm(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta,
- enum alu_op alu_op, bool skip)
+ enum alu_op alu_op)
{
const struct bpf_insn *insn = &meta->insn;
- if (skip) {
- meta->skip = true;
- return 0;
- }
-
wrp_alu_imm(nfp_prog, insn->dst_reg * 2, alu_op, insn->imm);
wrp_immed(nfp_prog, reg_both(insn->dst_reg * 2 + 1), 0);
@@ -2309,7 +2304,7 @@ static int xor_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
static int xor_imm(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
{
- return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_XOR, !meta->insn.imm);
+ return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_XOR);
}
static int and_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
@@ -2319,7 +2314,7 @@ static int and_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
static int and_imm(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
{
- return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_AND, !~meta->insn.imm);
+ return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_AND);
}
static int or_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
@@ -2329,7 +2324,7 @@ static int or_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
static int or_imm(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
{
- return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_OR, !meta->insn.imm);
+ return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_OR);
}
static int add_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
@@ -2339,7 +2334,7 @@ static int add_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
static int add_imm(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
{
- return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_ADD, !meta->insn.imm);
+ return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_ADD);
}
static int sub_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
@@ -2349,7 +2344,7 @@ static int sub_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
static int sub_imm(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
{
- return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_SUB, !meta->insn.imm);
+ return wrp_alu32_imm(nfp_prog, meta, ALU_OP_SUB);
}
static int mul_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)