diff options
author | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> | 2017-05-30 23:31:32 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2017-06-01 02:29:48 +0300 |
commit | 105c03614bff2de60adf338e3ee90652b65c2d05 (patch) | |
tree | 6a33c25dc229dd12bdce71c9056384b8a97aeb11 | |
parent | 50bbfed96766acb8b9e1b299e3daae5187c3eb5a (diff) | |
download | linux-105c03614bff2de60adf338e3ee90652b65c2d05.tar.xz |
bpf: fix stack_depth usage by test_bpf.ko
test_bpf.ko doesn't call verifier before selecting interpreter or JITing,
hence the tests need to manually specify the amount of stack they consume.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-rw-r--r-- | lib/test_bpf.c | 25 |
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c index be88cbaadde3..070bde56474c 100644 --- a/lib/test_bpf.c +++ b/lib/test_bpf.c @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ struct bpf_test { } test[MAX_SUBTESTS]; int (*fill_helper)(struct bpf_test *self); __u8 frag_data[MAX_DATA]; + int stack_depth; /* for eBPF only, since tests don't call verifier */ }; /* Large test cases need separate allocation and fill handler. */ @@ -455,6 +456,7 @@ static int __bpf_fill_stxdw(struct bpf_test *self, int size) self->u.ptr.insns = insn; self->u.ptr.len = len; + self->stack_depth = 40; return 0; } @@ -2317,7 +2319,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x08, 0x06, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x10, 0xbf, 0x48, 0xd6, 0x43, 0xd6}, - { { 38, 256 } } + { { 38, 256 } }, + .stack_depth = 64, }, /* BPF_ALU | BPF_MOV | BPF_X */ { @@ -4169,6 +4172,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { INTERNAL, { }, { { 0, 0xff } }, + .stack_depth = 40, }, { "ST_MEM_B: Store/Load byte: max positive", @@ -4181,6 +4185,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { INTERNAL, { }, { { 0, 0x7f } }, + .stack_depth = 40, }, { "STX_MEM_B: Store/Load byte: max negative", @@ -4194,6 +4199,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { INTERNAL, { }, { { 0, 0xff } }, + .stack_depth = 40, }, { "ST_MEM_H: Store/Load half word: max negative", @@ -4206,6 +4212,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { INTERNAL, { }, { { 0, 0xffff } }, + .stack_depth = 40, }, { "ST_MEM_H: Store/Load half word: max positive", @@ -4218,6 +4225,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { INTERNAL, { }, { { 0, 0x7fff } }, + .stack_depth = 40, }, { "STX_MEM_H: Store/Load half word: max negative", @@ -4231,6 +4239,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { INTERNAL, { }, { { 0, 0xffff } }, + .stack_depth = 40, }, { "ST_MEM_W: Store/Load word: max negative", @@ -4243,6 +4252,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { INTERNAL, { }, { { 0, 0xffffffff } }, + .stack_depth = 40, }, { "ST_MEM_W: Store/Load word: max positive", @@ -4255,6 +4265,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { INTERNAL, { }, { { 0, 0x7fffffff } }, + .stack_depth = 40, }, { "STX_MEM_W: Store/Load word: max negative", @@ -4268,6 +4279,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { INTERNAL, { }, { { 0, 0xffffffff } }, + .stack_depth = 40, }, { "ST_MEM_DW: Store/Load double word: max negative", @@ -4280,6 +4292,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { INTERNAL, { }, { { 0, 0xffffffff } }, + .stack_depth = 40, }, { "ST_MEM_DW: Store/Load double word: max negative 2", @@ -4297,6 +4310,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { INTERNAL, { }, { { 0, 0x1 } }, + .stack_depth = 40, }, { "ST_MEM_DW: Store/Load double word: max positive", @@ -4309,6 +4323,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { INTERNAL, { }, { { 0, 0x7fffffff } }, + .stack_depth = 40, }, { "STX_MEM_DW: Store/Load double word: max negative", @@ -4322,6 +4337,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { INTERNAL, { }, { { 0, 0xffffffff } }, + .stack_depth = 40, }, /* BPF_STX | BPF_XADD | BPF_W/DW */ { @@ -4336,6 +4352,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { INTERNAL, { }, { { 0, 0x22 } }, + .stack_depth = 40, }, { "STX_XADD_W: Test side-effects, r10: 0x12 + 0x10 = 0x22", @@ -4351,6 +4368,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { INTERNAL, { }, { { 0, 0 } }, + .stack_depth = 40, }, { "STX_XADD_W: Test side-effects, r0: 0x12 + 0x10 = 0x22", @@ -4363,6 +4381,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { INTERNAL, { }, { { 0, 0x12 } }, + .stack_depth = 40, }, { "STX_XADD_W: X + 1 + 1 + 1 + ...", @@ -4384,6 +4403,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { INTERNAL, { }, { { 0, 0x22 } }, + .stack_depth = 40, }, { "STX_XADD_DW: Test side-effects, r10: 0x12 + 0x10 = 0x22", @@ -4399,6 +4419,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { INTERNAL, { }, { { 0, 0 } }, + .stack_depth = 40, }, { "STX_XADD_DW: Test side-effects, r0: 0x12 + 0x10 = 0x22", @@ -4411,6 +4432,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { INTERNAL, { }, { { 0, 0x12 } }, + .stack_depth = 40, }, { "STX_XADD_DW: X + 1 + 1 + 1 + ...", @@ -5809,6 +5831,7 @@ static struct bpf_prog *generate_filter(int which, int *err) /* Type doesn't really matter here as long as it's not unspec. */ fp->type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER; memcpy(fp->insnsi, fptr, fp->len * sizeof(struct bpf_insn)); + fp->aux->stack_depth = tests[which].stack_depth; /* We cannot error here as we don't need type compatibility * checks. |