summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEyal Shapira <eyal@wizery.com>2015-01-16 23:37:04 +0300
committerEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>2015-02-01 16:39:19 +0300
commit3d44eebf773950dd2e24ad7ac786b589d6522d67 (patch)
tree53fd31f800b45ae4de1a2bdfbd66e462ff4c53a9
parente885c58bf88248a7e033749f532c3718442de22a (diff)
downloadlinux-3d44eebf773950dd2e24ad7ac786b589d6522d67.tar.xz
iwlwifi: mvm: add beamformer support
VHT Beamformer (BFER) will be used if the peer supports it and there's a benefit to use it vs. STBC or SISO. The driver now tells the FW whether BFER and/or STBC are allowed but the FW will make the decision to use either or stick to SISO on its own. BFER is limited to a single remote peer. The driver takes care of ensuring this to the FW and prioritizes with which peer BFER will be used. Signed-off-by: Eyal Shapira <eyalx.shapira@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-fw-file.h2
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/fw-api-rs.h35
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/mac80211.c7
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c157
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.h4
5 files changed, 177 insertions, 28 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-fw-file.h b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-fw-file.h
index e4f589898eda..016d91384681 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-fw-file.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-fw-file.h
@@ -270,6 +270,7 @@ enum iwl_ucode_tlv_api {
* @IWL_UCODE_TLV_CAPA_D0I3_SUPPORT: supports D0i3
* @IWL_UCODE_TLV_CAPA_LAR_SUPPORT: supports Location Aware Regulatory
* @IWL_UCODE_TLV_CAPA_UMAC_SCAN: supports UMAC scan.
+ * @IWL_UCODE_TLV_CAPA_BEAMFORMER: supports Beamformer
* @IWL_UCODE_TLV_CAPA_TDLS_SUPPORT: support basic TDLS functionality
* @IWL_UCODE_TLV_CAPA_TXPOWER_INSERTION_SUPPORT: supports insertion of current
* tx power value into TPC Report action frame and Link Measurement Report
@@ -288,6 +289,7 @@ enum iwl_ucode_tlv_capa {
IWL_UCODE_TLV_CAPA_D0I3_SUPPORT = BIT(0),
IWL_UCODE_TLV_CAPA_LAR_SUPPORT = BIT(1),
IWL_UCODE_TLV_CAPA_UMAC_SCAN = BIT(2),
+ IWL_UCODE_TLV_CAPA_BEAMFORMER = BIT(3),
IWL_UCODE_TLV_CAPA_TDLS_SUPPORT = BIT(6),
IWL_UCODE_TLV_CAPA_TXPOWER_INSERTION_SUPPORT = BIT(8),
IWL_UCODE_TLV_CAPA_DS_PARAM_SET_IE_SUPPORT = BIT(9),
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/fw-api-rs.h b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/fw-api-rs.h
index 6a2a6b0ab91b..4c33f2775dc9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/fw-api-rs.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/fw-api-rs.h
@@ -308,16 +308,33 @@ enum {
#define LQ_FLAG_DYNAMIC_BW_POS 6
#define LQ_FLAG_DYNAMIC_BW_MSK (1 << LQ_FLAG_DYNAMIC_BW_POS)
-/* Single Stream Parameters
- * SS_STBC/BFER_ALLOWED - Controls whether STBC or Beamformer (BFER) is allowed
- * ucode will make a smart decision between SISO/STBC/BFER
- * SS_PARAMS_VALID - if not set ignore the ss_params field.
+/* Single Stream Tx Parameters (lq_cmd->ss_params)
+ * Flags to control a smart FW decision about whether BFER/STBC/SISO will be
+ * used for single stream Tx.
*/
-enum {
- RS_SS_STBC_ALLOWED = BIT(0),
- RS_SS_BFER_ALLOWED = BIT(1),
- RS_SS_PARAMS_VALID = BIT(31),
-};
+
+/* Bit 0-1: Max STBC streams allowed. Can be 0-3.
+ * (0) - No STBC allowed
+ * (1) - 2x1 STBC allowed (HT/VHT)
+ * (2) - 4x2 STBC allowed (HT/VHT)
+ * (3) - 3x2 STBC allowed (HT only)
+ * All our chips are at most 2 antennas so only (1) is valid for now.
+ */
+#define LQ_SS_STBC_ALLOWED_POS 0
+#define LQ_SS_STBC_ALLOWED_MSK (3 << LQ_SS_STBC_ALLOWED_MSK)
+
+/* 2x1 STBC is allowed */
+#define LQ_SS_STBC_1SS_ALLOWED (1 << LQ_SS_STBC_ALLOWED_POS)
+
+/* Bit 2: Beamformer (VHT only) is allowed */
+#define LQ_SS_BFER_ALLOWED_POS 2
+#define LQ_SS_BFER_ALLOWED (1 << LQ_SS_BFER_ALLOWED_POS)
+
+/* Bit 31: ss_params field is valid. Used for FW backward compatibility
+ * with other drivers which don't support the ss_params API yet
+ */
+#define LQ_SS_PARAMS_VALID_POS 31
+#define LQ_SS_PARAMS_VALID (1 << LQ_SS_PARAMS_VALID_POS)
/**
* struct iwl_lq_cmd - link quality command
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/mac80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/mac80211.c
index cfd7bfcb3fc6..51e02e6ba0ac 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/mac80211.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/mac80211.c
@@ -401,10 +401,15 @@ int iwl_mvm_mac_setup_register(struct iwl_mvm *mvm)
if (mvm->nvm_data->bands[IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ].n_channels)
hw->wiphy->bands[IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ] =
&mvm->nvm_data->bands[IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ];
- if (mvm->nvm_data->bands[IEEE80211_BAND_5GHZ].n_channels)
+ if (mvm->nvm_data->bands[IEEE80211_BAND_5GHZ].n_channels) {
hw->wiphy->bands[IEEE80211_BAND_5GHZ] =
&mvm->nvm_data->bands[IEEE80211_BAND_5GHZ];
+ if (mvm->fw->ucode_capa.capa[0] & IWL_UCODE_TLV_CAPA_BEAMFORMER)
+ hw->wiphy->bands[IEEE80211_BAND_5GHZ]->vht_cap.cap |=
+ IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SU_BEAMFORMER_CAPABLE;
+ }
+
hw->wiphy->hw_version = mvm->trans->hw_id;
if (iwlmvm_mod_params.power_scheme != IWL_POWER_SCHEME_CAM)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c
index 9f32f2db95bd..95b718b4f8ab 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c
@@ -1805,7 +1805,7 @@ static bool rs_stbc_allow(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
/* Our chip supports Tx STBC and the peer is an HT/VHT STA which
* supports STBC of at least 1*SS
*/
- if (!lq_sta->stbc)
+ if (!lq_sta->stbc_capable)
return false;
if (!iwl_mvm_bt_coex_is_mimo_allowed(mvm, sta))
@@ -2626,7 +2626,7 @@ static void rs_ht_init(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
if (mvm->cfg->ht_params->stbc &&
(num_of_ant(iwl_mvm_get_valid_tx_ant(mvm)) > 1) &&
(ht_cap->cap & IEEE80211_HT_CAP_RX_STBC))
- lq_sta->stbc = true;
+ lq_sta->stbc_capable = true;
lq_sta->is_vht = false;
}
@@ -2645,7 +2645,12 @@ static void rs_vht_init(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
if (mvm->cfg->ht_params->stbc &&
(num_of_ant(iwl_mvm_get_valid_tx_ant(mvm)) > 1) &&
(vht_cap->cap & IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_RXSTBC_MASK))
- lq_sta->stbc = true;
+ lq_sta->stbc_capable = true;
+
+ if ((mvm->fw->ucode_capa.capa[0] & IWL_UCODE_TLV_CAPA_BEAMFORMER) &&
+ (num_of_ant(iwl_mvm_get_valid_tx_ant(mvm)) > 1) &&
+ (vht_cap->cap & IEEE80211_VHT_CAP_SU_BEAMFORMEE_CAPABLE))
+ lq_sta->bfer_capable = true;
lq_sta->is_vht = true;
}
@@ -2778,11 +2783,12 @@ void iwl_mvm_rs_rate_init(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
rs_get_max_rate_from_mask(lq_sta->active_mimo2_rate);
IWL_DEBUG_RATE(mvm,
- "RATE MASK: LEGACY=%lX SISO=%lX MIMO2=%lX VHT=%d LDPC=%d STBC=%d\n",
+ "LEGACY=%lX SISO=%lX MIMO2=%lX VHT=%d LDPC=%d STBC=%d BFER=%d\n",
lq_sta->active_legacy_rate,
lq_sta->active_siso_rate,
lq_sta->active_mimo2_rate,
- lq_sta->is_vht, lq_sta->ldpc, lq_sta->stbc);
+ lq_sta->is_vht, lq_sta->ldpc, lq_sta->stbc_capable,
+ lq_sta->bfer_capable);
IWL_DEBUG_RATE(mvm, "MAX RATE: LEGACY=%d SISO=%d MIMO2=%d\n",
lq_sta->max_legacy_rate_idx,
lq_sta->max_siso_rate_idx,
@@ -2916,23 +2922,15 @@ static void rs_build_rates_table(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
u8 valid_tx_ant = 0;
struct iwl_lq_cmd *lq_cmd = &lq_sta->lq;
bool toggle_ant = false;
- bool stbc_allowed = false;
memcpy(&rate, initial_rate, sizeof(rate));
valid_tx_ant = iwl_mvm_get_valid_tx_ant(mvm);
- stbc_allowed = rs_stbc_allow(mvm, sta, lq_sta);
- if (mvm->fw->ucode_capa.api[0] & IWL_UCODE_TLV_API_LQ_SS_PARAMS) {
- u32 ss_params = RS_SS_PARAMS_VALID;
-
- if (stbc_allowed)
- ss_params |= RS_SS_STBC_ALLOWED;
- lq_cmd->ss_params = cpu_to_le32(ss_params);
- } else {
- /* TODO: remove old API when min FW API hits 14 */
- rate.stbc = stbc_allowed;
- }
+ /* TODO: remove old API when min FW API hits 14 */
+ if (!(mvm->fw->ucode_capa.api[0] & IWL_UCODE_TLV_API_LQ_SS_PARAMS) &&
+ rs_stbc_allow(mvm, sta, lq_sta))
+ rate.stbc = true;
if (is_siso(&rate)) {
num_rates = IWL_MVM_RS_INITIAL_SISO_NUM_RATES;
@@ -2980,6 +2978,128 @@ static void rs_build_rates_table(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
}
+struct rs_bfer_active_iter_data {
+ struct ieee80211_sta *exclude_sta;
+ struct iwl_mvm_sta *bfer_mvmsta;
+};
+
+static void rs_bfer_active_iter(void *_data,
+ struct ieee80211_sta *sta)
+{
+ struct rs_bfer_active_iter_data *data = _data;
+ struct iwl_mvm_sta *mvmsta = iwl_mvm_sta_from_mac80211(sta);
+ struct iwl_lq_cmd *lq_cmd = &mvmsta->lq_sta.lq;
+ u32 ss_params = le32_to_cpu(lq_cmd->ss_params);
+
+ if (sta == data->exclude_sta)
+ return;
+
+ /* The current sta has BFER allowed */
+ if (ss_params & LQ_SS_BFER_ALLOWED) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(data->bfer_mvmsta != NULL);
+
+ data->bfer_mvmsta = mvmsta;
+ }
+}
+
+static int rs_bfer_priority(struct iwl_mvm_sta *sta)
+{
+ int prio = -1;
+ enum nl80211_iftype viftype = ieee80211_vif_type_p2p(sta->vif);
+
+ switch (viftype) {
+ case NL80211_IFTYPE_AP:
+ case NL80211_IFTYPE_P2P_GO:
+ prio = 3;
+ break;
+ case NL80211_IFTYPE_P2P_CLIENT:
+ prio = 2;
+ break;
+ case NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION:
+ prio = 1;
+ break;
+ default:
+ WARN_ONCE(true, "viftype %d sta_id %d", viftype, sta->sta_id);
+ prio = -1;
+ }
+
+ return prio;
+}
+
+/* Returns >0 if sta1 has a higher BFER priority compared to sta2 */
+static int rs_bfer_priority_cmp(struct iwl_mvm_sta *sta1,
+ struct iwl_mvm_sta *sta2)
+{
+ int prio1 = rs_bfer_priority(sta1);
+ int prio2 = rs_bfer_priority(sta2);
+
+ if (prio1 > prio2)
+ return 1;
+ if (prio1 < prio2)
+ return -1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void rs_set_lq_ss_params(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
+ struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
+ struct iwl_lq_sta *lq_sta,
+ const struct rs_rate *initial_rate)
+{
+ struct iwl_lq_cmd *lq_cmd = &lq_sta->lq;
+ struct iwl_mvm_sta *mvmsta = iwl_mvm_sta_from_mac80211(sta);
+ struct rs_bfer_active_iter_data data = {
+ .exclude_sta = sta,
+ .bfer_mvmsta = NULL,
+ };
+ struct iwl_mvm_sta *bfer_mvmsta = NULL;
+ u32 ss_params = LQ_SS_PARAMS_VALID;
+
+ if (!iwl_mvm_bt_coex_is_mimo_allowed(mvm, sta))
+ goto out;
+
+ if (lq_sta->stbc_capable)
+ ss_params |= LQ_SS_STBC_1SS_ALLOWED;
+
+ if (!lq_sta->bfer_capable)
+ goto out;
+
+ ieee80211_iterate_stations_atomic(mvm->hw,
+ rs_bfer_active_iter,
+ &data);
+ bfer_mvmsta = data.bfer_mvmsta;
+
+ /* This code is safe as it doesn't run concurrently for different
+ * stations. This is guaranteed by the fact that calls to
+ * ieee80211_tx_status wouldn't run concurrently for a single HW.
+ */
+ if (!bfer_mvmsta) {
+ IWL_DEBUG_RATE(mvm, "No sta with BFER allowed found. Allow\n");
+
+ ss_params |= LQ_SS_BFER_ALLOWED;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ IWL_DEBUG_RATE(mvm, "Found existing sta %d with BFER activated\n",
+ bfer_mvmsta->sta_id);
+
+ /* Disallow BFER on another STA if active and we're a higher priority */
+ if (rs_bfer_priority_cmp(mvmsta, bfer_mvmsta) > 0) {
+ struct iwl_lq_cmd *bfersta_lq_cmd = &bfer_mvmsta->lq_sta.lq;
+ u32 bfersta_ss_params = le32_to_cpu(bfersta_lq_cmd->ss_params);
+
+ bfersta_ss_params &= ~LQ_SS_BFER_ALLOWED;
+ bfersta_lq_cmd->ss_params = cpu_to_le32(bfersta_ss_params);
+ iwl_mvm_send_lq_cmd(mvm, bfersta_lq_cmd, false);
+
+ ss_params |= LQ_SS_BFER_ALLOWED;
+ IWL_DEBUG_RATE(mvm,
+ "Lower priority BFER sta found (%d). Switch BFER\n",
+ bfer_mvmsta->sta_id);
+ }
+out:
+ lq_cmd->ss_params = cpu_to_le32(ss_params);
+}
+
static void rs_fill_lq_cmd(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
struct iwl_lq_sta *lq_sta,
@@ -3006,6 +3126,9 @@ static void rs_fill_lq_cmd(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
rs_build_rates_table(mvm, sta, lq_sta, initial_rate);
+ if (mvm->fw->ucode_capa.api[0] & IWL_UCODE_TLV_API_LQ_SS_PARAMS)
+ rs_set_lq_ss_params(mvm, sta, lq_sta, initial_rate);
+
if (num_of_ant(initial_rate->ant) == 1)
lq_cmd->single_stream_ant_msk = initial_rate->ant;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.h b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.h
index f8f5bf21cc38..ba57f5ae2375 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.h
@@ -293,7 +293,9 @@ struct iwl_lq_sta {
u64 last_tx;
bool is_vht;
bool ldpc; /* LDPC Rx is supported by the STA */
- bool stbc; /* Tx STBC is supported by chip and Rx by STA */
+ bool stbc_capable; /* Tx STBC is supported by chip and Rx by STA */
+ bool bfer_capable; /* Remote supports beamformee and we BFer */
+
enum ieee80211_band band;
/* The following are bitmaps of rates; IWL_RATE_6M_MASK, etc. */