diff options
author | Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> | 2012-03-30 22:41:51 +0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> | 2012-04-01 00:03:16 +0400 |
commit | a32555466caee38faeef4e44d7878ecbff1199bc (patch) | |
tree | e0dea5e747bca90e234938d8545634a16aca561a | |
parent | a6ecdfcfba9392f469992dd6016ceafb3ea62123 (diff) | |
download | linux-a32555466caee38faeef4e44d7878ecbff1199bc.tar.xz |
untangling do_lookup() - switch to calling __lookup_hash()
now we have __lookup_hash() open-coded if !dentry case;
just call the damn thing instead...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-rw-r--r-- | fs/namei.c | 113 |
1 files changed, 46 insertions, 67 deletions
diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c index 1d60fdf01b37..a919affd1531 100644 --- a/fs/namei.c +++ b/fs/namei.c @@ -1108,6 +1108,51 @@ static struct dentry *d_inode_lookup(struct dentry *parent, struct dentry *dentr return dentry; } +static struct dentry *__lookup_hash(struct qstr *name, + struct dentry *base, struct nameidata *nd) +{ + struct dentry *dentry; + + /* + * Don't bother with __d_lookup: callers are for creat as + * well as unlink, so a lot of the time it would cost + * a double lookup. + */ + dentry = d_lookup(base, name); + + if (dentry && d_need_lookup(dentry)) { + /* + * __lookup_hash is called with the parent dir's i_mutex already + * held, so we are good to go here. + */ + return d_inode_lookup(base, dentry, nd); + } + + if (dentry && (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_OP_REVALIDATE)) { + int status = d_revalidate(dentry, nd); + if (unlikely(status <= 0)) { + /* + * The dentry failed validation. + * If d_revalidate returned 0 attempt to invalidate + * the dentry otherwise d_revalidate is asking us + * to return a fail status. + */ + if (status < 0) { + dput(dentry); + return ERR_PTR(status); + } else if (!d_invalidate(dentry)) { + dput(dentry); + dentry = NULL; + } + } + } + + if (!dentry) + dentry = d_alloc_and_lookup(base, name, nd); + + return dentry; +} + /* * It's more convoluted than I'd like it to be, but... it's still fairly * small and for now I'd prefer to have fast path as straight as possible. @@ -1173,28 +1218,7 @@ retry: BUG_ON(nd->inode != dir); mutex_lock(&dir->i_mutex); - dentry = d_lookup(parent, name); - if (dentry && d_need_lookup(dentry)) { - dentry = d_inode_lookup(parent, dentry, nd); - goto l; - } - if (dentry && (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_OP_REVALIDATE)) { - status = d_revalidate(dentry, nd); - if (unlikely(status <= 0)) { - if (status < 0) { - dput(dentry); - dentry = ERR_PTR(status); - goto l; - } - if (!d_invalidate(dentry)) { - dput(dentry); - dentry = NULL; - } - } - } - if (!dentry) - dentry = d_alloc_and_lookup(parent, name, nd); - l: + dentry = __lookup_hash(name, parent, nd); mutex_unlock(&dir->i_mutex); if (IS_ERR(dentry)) return PTR_ERR(dentry); @@ -1850,51 +1874,6 @@ int vfs_path_lookup(struct dentry *dentry, struct vfsmount *mnt, return err; } -static struct dentry *__lookup_hash(struct qstr *name, - struct dentry *base, struct nameidata *nd) -{ - struct dentry *dentry; - - /* - * Don't bother with __d_lookup: callers are for creat as - * well as unlink, so a lot of the time it would cost - * a double lookup. - */ - dentry = d_lookup(base, name); - - if (dentry && d_need_lookup(dentry)) { - /* - * __lookup_hash is called with the parent dir's i_mutex already - * held, so we are good to go here. - */ - return d_inode_lookup(base, dentry, nd); - } - - if (dentry && (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_OP_REVALIDATE)) { - int status = d_revalidate(dentry, nd); - if (unlikely(status <= 0)) { - /* - * The dentry failed validation. - * If d_revalidate returned 0 attempt to invalidate - * the dentry otherwise d_revalidate is asking us - * to return a fail status. - */ - if (status < 0) { - dput(dentry); - return ERR_PTR(status); - } else if (!d_invalidate(dentry)) { - dput(dentry); - dentry = NULL; - } - } - } - - if (!dentry) - dentry = d_alloc_and_lookup(base, name, nd); - - return dentry; -} - /* * Restricted form of lookup. Doesn't follow links, single-component only, * needs parent already locked. Doesn't follow mounts. |