diff options
author | Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> | 2009-12-16 03:47:11 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2009-12-16 18:20:07 +0300 |
commit | 57f9fd7d25ac9a0d7e3a4ced580e780ab4524e3b (patch) | |
tree | ff95e62e7326ba7e77903f7f767e9650c0d9b3dd | |
parent | a3032a2c15c6967f9f0c0c28375b1a5c833a3112 (diff) | |
download | linux-57f9fd7d25ac9a0d7e3a4ced580e780ab4524e3b.tar.xz |
memcg: cleanup mem_cgroup_move_parent()
mem_cgroup_move_parent() calls try_charge first and cancel_charge on
failure. IMHO, charge/uncharge(especially charge) is high cost operation,
so we should avoid it as far as possible.
This patch tries to delay try_charge in mem_cgroup_move_parent() by
re-ordering checks it does.
And this patch renames mem_cgroup_move_account() to
__mem_cgroup_move_account(), changes the return value of
__mem_cgroup_move_account() from int to void, and adds a new
wrapper(mem_cgroup_move_account()), which checks whether a @pc is valid
for moving account and calls __mem_cgroup_move_account().
This patch removes the last caller of trylock_page_cgroup(), so removes
its definition too.
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-rw-r--r-- | include/linux/page_cgroup.h | 7 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | mm/memcontrol.c | 84 |
2 files changed, 37 insertions, 54 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/page_cgroup.h b/include/linux/page_cgroup.h index 4b938d4f3ac2..b0e4eb126236 100644 --- a/include/linux/page_cgroup.h +++ b/include/linux/page_cgroup.h @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ static inline void ClearPageCgroup##uname(struct page_cgroup *pc) \ static inline int TestClearPageCgroup##uname(struct page_cgroup *pc) \ { return test_and_clear_bit(PCG_##lname, &pc->flags); } +TESTPCGFLAG(Locked, LOCK) + /* Cache flag is set only once (at allocation) */ TESTPCGFLAG(Cache, CACHE) CLEARPCGFLAG(Cache, CACHE) @@ -86,11 +88,6 @@ static inline void lock_page_cgroup(struct page_cgroup *pc) bit_spin_lock(PCG_LOCK, &pc->flags); } -static inline int trylock_page_cgroup(struct page_cgroup *pc) -{ - return bit_spin_trylock(PCG_LOCK, &pc->flags); -} - static inline void unlock_page_cgroup(struct page_cgroup *pc) { bit_spin_unlock(PCG_LOCK, &pc->flags); diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 2d6b4a912a6d..6273984f2e34 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -1613,27 +1613,22 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_commit_charge(struct mem_cgroup *mem, } /** - * mem_cgroup_move_account - move account of the page + * __mem_cgroup_move_account - move account of the page * @pc: page_cgroup of the page. * @from: mem_cgroup which the page is moved from. * @to: mem_cgroup which the page is moved to. @from != @to. * * The caller must confirm following. * - page is not on LRU (isolate_page() is useful.) - * - * returns 0 at success, - * returns -EBUSY when lock is busy or "pc" is unstable. + * - the pc is locked, used, and ->mem_cgroup points to @from. * * This function does "uncharge" from old cgroup but doesn't do "charge" to * new cgroup. It should be done by a caller. */ -static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc, +static void __mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc, struct mem_cgroup *from, struct mem_cgroup *to) { - struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *from_mz, *to_mz; - int nid, zid; - int ret = -EBUSY; struct page *page; int cpu; struct mem_cgroup_stat *stat; @@ -1641,20 +1636,9 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc, VM_BUG_ON(from == to); VM_BUG_ON(PageLRU(pc->page)); - - nid = page_cgroup_nid(pc); - zid = page_cgroup_zid(pc); - from_mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(from, nid, zid); - to_mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(to, nid, zid); - - if (!trylock_page_cgroup(pc)) - return ret; - - if (!PageCgroupUsed(pc)) - goto out; - - if (pc->mem_cgroup != from) - goto out; + VM_BUG_ON(!PageCgroupLocked(pc)); + VM_BUG_ON(!PageCgroupUsed(pc)); + VM_BUG_ON(pc->mem_cgroup != from); if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(from)) res_counter_uncharge(&from->res, PAGE_SIZE); @@ -1683,15 +1667,28 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc, css_get(&to->css); pc->mem_cgroup = to; mem_cgroup_charge_statistics(to, pc, true); - ret = 0; -out: - unlock_page_cgroup(pc); /* * We charges against "to" which may not have any tasks. Then, "to" * can be under rmdir(). But in current implementation, caller of * this function is just force_empty() and it's garanteed that * "to" is never removed. So, we don't check rmdir status here. */ +} + +/* + * check whether the @pc is valid for moving account and call + * __mem_cgroup_move_account() + */ +static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc, + struct mem_cgroup *from, struct mem_cgroup *to) +{ + int ret = -EINVAL; + lock_page_cgroup(pc); + if (PageCgroupUsed(pc) && pc->mem_cgroup == from) { + __mem_cgroup_move_account(pc, from, to); + ret = 0; + } + unlock_page_cgroup(pc); return ret; } @@ -1713,38 +1710,27 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_parent(struct page_cgroup *pc, if (!pcg) return -EINVAL; + ret = -EBUSY; + if (!get_page_unless_zero(page)) + goto out; + if (isolate_lru_page(page)) + goto put; parent = mem_cgroup_from_cont(pcg); - - ret = __mem_cgroup_try_charge(NULL, gfp_mask, &parent, false, page); if (ret || !parent) - return ret; - - if (!get_page_unless_zero(page)) { - ret = -EBUSY; - goto uncharge; - } - - ret = isolate_lru_page(page); - - if (ret) - goto cancel; + goto put_back; ret = mem_cgroup_move_account(pc, child, parent); - + if (!ret) + css_put(&parent->css); /* drop extra refcnt by try_charge() */ + else + mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(parent); /* does css_put */ +put_back: putback_lru_page(page); - if (!ret) { - put_page(page); - /* drop extra refcnt by try_charge() */ - css_put(&parent->css); - return 0; - } - -cancel: +put: put_page(page); -uncharge: - mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(parent); +out: return ret; } |