diff options
author | Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> | 2005-05-23 23:36:25 +0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2005-05-23 23:36:25 +0400 |
commit | 15333038d577b0c0255c0f14a38d9e6895937453 (patch) | |
tree | c48106158bce4c7af328c486b7f33ad2133459ee | |
parent | 314324121f9b94b2ca657a494cf2b9cb0e4a28cc (diff) | |
download | linux-15333038d577b0c0255c0f14a38d9e6895937453.tar.xz |
[CRYPTO]: Only reschedule if !in_atomic()
The netlink gfp_any() problem made me double-check the uses of in_softirq()
in crypto/*. It seems to me that we should be checking in_atomic() instead
of in_softirq() in crypto_yield. Otherwise people calling the crypto ops
with spin locks held or preemption disabled will get burnt, right?
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-rw-r--r-- | crypto/internal.h | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/crypto/internal.h b/crypto/internal.h index e68e43886d3c..964b9a60ca24 100644 --- a/crypto/internal.h +++ b/crypto/internal.h @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static inline void crypto_kunmap(void *vaddr, int out) static inline void crypto_yield(struct crypto_tfm *tfm) { - if (!in_softirq()) + if (!in_atomic()) cond_resched(); } |