diff options
| author | Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> | 2010-10-27 01:23:06 +0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2010-10-27 03:52:18 +0400 |
| commit | bb2ab10fa693110cffa7087ffe2749d6e9a27d5f (patch) | |
| tree | f45c76ec0bdae972fc8a1bb2cf04bca31c02c88c | |
| parent | 6d411e6c01608cefb7b9ea6712110538a1432f9f (diff) | |
| download | linux-bb2ab10fa693110cffa7087ffe2749d6e9a27d5f.tar.xz | |
lib/list_sort: test: use more reasonable printk levels
I do not see any reason to use KERN_WARN for normal messages and
KERN_EMERG for error messages in the lib_sort testing routine. Let's use
more reasonable KERN_NORM and KERN_ERR levels.
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Cc: Don Mullis <don.mullis@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/list_sort.c | 16 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/lib/list_sort.c b/lib/list_sort.c index 827794016bfb..679b3a060e7e 100644 --- a/lib/list_sort.c +++ b/lib/list_sort.c @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static int __init list_sort_test(void) struct list_head *head = kmalloc(sizeof(*head), GFP_KERNEL); struct list_head *cur; - printk(KERN_WARNING "testing list_sort()\n"); + printk(KERN_DEBUG "testing list_sort()\n"); cur = head; for (i = 0; i < LIST_SORT_TEST_LENGTH; i++) { @@ -189,17 +189,17 @@ static int __init list_sort_test(void) struct debug_el *el = container_of(cur, struct debug_el, l_h); int cmp_result = cmp(NULL, cur, cur->next); if (cur->next->prev != cur) { - printk(KERN_EMERG "list_sort() returned " - "a corrupted list!\n"); + printk(KERN_ERR "list_sort() returned " + "a corrupted list!\n"); return 1; } else if (cmp_result > 0) { - printk(KERN_EMERG "list_sort() failed to sort!\n"); + printk(KERN_ERR "list_sort() failed to sort!\n"); return 1; } else if (cmp_result == 0 && el->serial >= container_of(cur->next, struct debug_el, l_h)->serial) { - printk(KERN_EMERG "list_sort() failed to preserve order" - " of equivalent elements!\n"); + printk(KERN_ERR "list_sort() failed to preserve order " + "of equivalent elements!\n"); return 1; } kfree(cur->prev); @@ -207,8 +207,8 @@ static int __init list_sort_test(void) } kfree(cur); if (count != LIST_SORT_TEST_LENGTH) { - printk(KERN_EMERG "list_sort() returned list of" - "different length!\n"); + printk(KERN_ERR "list_sort() returned list of " + "different length!\n"); return 1; } return 0; |