kernel/linux.git/tools/testing/selftests/x86, branch v4.19.16

x86/vdso: Fix vDSO syscall fallback asm constraint regression

2018-10-04T06:17:50+00:00

When I added the missing memory outputs, I failed to update the index of the first argument (ebx) on 32-bit builds, which broke the fallbacks. Somehow I must have screwed up my testing or gotten lucky. Add another test to cover gettimeofday() as well. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 715bd9d12f84 ("x86/vdso: Fix asm constraints on vDSO syscall fallbacks") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/21bd45ab04b6d838278fa5bebfa9163eceffa13c.1538608971.git.luto@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

selftests/x86: Add clock_gettime() tests to test_vdso

2018-10-02T06:28:32+00:00

Now that the vDSO implementation of clock_gettime() is getting reworked, add a selftest for it. This tests that its output is consistent with the syscall version. This is marked for stable to serve as a test for commit 715bd9d12f84 ("x86/vdso: Fix asm constraints on vDSO syscall fallbacks") Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/082399674de2619b2befd8c0dde49b260605b126.1538422295.git.luto@kernel.org

selftests/x86/sigreturn: Do minor cleanups

2018-06-27T07:36:56+00:00

We have short names for the requested and resulting register values. Use them instead of spelling out the whole register entry for each case. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/bb3bc1f923a2f6fe7912d22a1068fe29d6033d38.1530076529.git.luto@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

selftests/x86/sigreturn/64: Fix spurious failures on AMD CPUs

2018-06-27T07:36:56+00:00

When I wrote the sigreturn test, I didn't realize that AMD's busted IRET behavior was different from Intel's busted IRET behavior: On AMD CPUs, the CPU leaks the high 32 bits of the kernel stack pointer to certain userspace contexts. Gee, thanks. There's very little the kernel can do about it. Modify the test so it passes. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/86e7fd3564497f657de30a36da4505799eebef01.1530076529.git.luto@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

selftests/x86: Detect -no-pie availability

2018-05-30T21:21:51+00:00

Some toolchains need -no-pie to build all tests, others do not support the -no-pie flag at all. Therefore, add another test for the availability of the flag. This amends commit 3346a6a4e5ba8c040360f753b26938cec31a4bdc ("selftests: x86: sysret_ss_attrs doesn't build on a PIE build"). Signed-off-by: Florian Weimer Acked-by: Randy Dunlap Tested-by: Randy Dunlap Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan (Samsung OSG)

x86/pkeys/selftests: Add a test for pkey 0

2018-05-14T09:14:45+00:00

Protection key 0 is the default key for all memory and will not normally come back from pkey_alloc(). But, you might still want pass it to mprotect_pkey(). This check ensures that you can use pkey 0. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Michael Ellermen Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ram Pai Cc: Shuah Khan Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171356.9E40B254@viggo.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

x86/pkeys/selftests: Save off 'prot' for allocations

2018-05-14T09:14:45+00:00

This makes it possible to to tell what 'prot' a given allocation is supposed to have. That way, if we want to change just the pkey, we know what 'prot' to pass to mprotect_pkey(). Also, keep a record of the most recent allocation so the tests can easily find it. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Michael Ellermen Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ram Pai Cc: Shuah Khan Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171354.AA23E228@viggo.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pointer math

2018-05-14T09:14:45+00:00

We dump out the entire area of the siginfo where the si_pkey_ptr is supposed to be. But, we do some math on the poitner, which is a u32. We intended to do byte math, not u32 math on the pointer. Cast it over to a u8* so it works. Also, move this block of code to below th si_code check. It doesn't hurt anything, but the si_pkey field is gibberish for other signal types. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Michael Ellermen Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ram Pai Cc: Shuah Khan Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171352.9BE09819@viggo.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pkey exhaustion test off-by-one

2018-05-14T09:14:45+00:00

In our "exhaust all pkeys" test, we make sure that there is the expected number available. Turns out that the test did not cover the execute-only key, but discussed it anyway. It did *not* discuss the test-allocated key. Now that we have a test for the mprotect(PROT_EXEC) case, this off-by-one issue showed itself. Correct the off-by- one and add the explanation for the case we missed. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Michael Ellermen Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ram Pai Cc: Shuah Khan Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171350.E1656B95@viggo.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

x86/pkeys/selftests: Add PROT_EXEC test

2018-05-14T09:14:45+00:00

Under the covers, implement executable-only memory with protection keys when userspace calls mprotect(PROT_EXEC). But, we did not have a selftest for that. Now we do. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Michael Ellermen Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ram Pai Cc: Shuah Khan Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171348.9EEE4BEF@viggo.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar