kernel/linux.git/tools/testing/selftests/vm, branch v5.10.89

selftest: fix build error in tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c

2021-08-04T10:46:39+00:00

When backporting 0db282ba2c12 ("selftest: use mmap instead of posix_memalign to allocate memory") to this stable branch, I forgot a { breaking the build. Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

selftest: use mmap instead of posix_memalign to allocate memory

2021-07-28T12:35:46+00:00

commit 0db282ba2c12c1515d490d14a1ff696643ab0f1b upstream. This test passes pointers obtained from anon_allocate_area to the userfaultfd and mremap APIs. This causes a problem if the system allocator returns tagged pointers because with the tagged address ABI the kernel rejects tagged addresses passed to these APIs, which would end up causing the test to fail. To make this test compatible with such system allocators, stop using the system allocator to allocate memory in anon_allocate_area, and instead just use mmap. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210714195437.118982-3-pcc@google.com Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/Icac91064fcd923f77a83e8e133f8631c5b8fc241 Fixes: c47174fc362a ("userfaultfd: selftest") Co-developed-by: Lokesh Gidra Signed-off-by: Lokesh Gidra Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas Cc: Vincenzo Frascino Cc: Dave Martin Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Alistair Delva Cc: William McVicker Cc: Evgenii Stepanov Cc: Mitch Phillips Cc: Andrey Konovalov Cc: [5.4] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

selftests/vm/pkeys: refill shadow register after implicit kernel write

2021-07-14T14:56:52+00:00

[ Upstream commit 6039ca254979694c5362dfebadd105e286c397bb ] The pkey test code keeps a "shadow" of the pkey register around. This ensures that any bugs which might write to the register can be caught more quickly. Generally, userspace has a good idea when the kernel is going to write to the register. For instance, alloc_pkey() is passed a permission mask. The caller of alloc_pkey() can update the shadow based on the return value and the mask. But, the kernel can also modify the pkey register in a more sneaky way. For mprotect(PROT_EXEC) mappings, the kernel will allocate a pkey and write the pkey register to create an execute-only mapping. The kernel never tells userspace what key it uses for this. This can cause the test to fail with messages like: protection_keys_64.2: pkey-helpers.h:132: _read_pkey_reg: Assertion `pkey_reg == shadow_pkey_reg' failed. because the shadow was not updated with the new kernel-set value. Forcibly update the shadow value immediately after an mprotect(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210611164200.EF76AB73@viggo.jf.intel.com Fixes: 6af17cf89e99 ("x86/pkeys/selftests: Add PROT_EXEC test") Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Tested-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V Cc: Ram Pai Cc: Sandipan Das Cc: Florian Weimer Cc: "Desnes A. Nunes do Rosario" Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Michal Suchanek Cc: Shuah Khan Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

selftests/vm/pkeys: handle negative sys_pkey_alloc() return code

2021-07-14T14:56:52+00:00

[ Upstream commit bf68294a2ec39ed7fec6a5b45d52034e6983157a ] The alloc_pkey() sefltest function wraps the sys_pkey_alloc() system call. On success, it updates its "shadow" register value because sys_pkey_alloc() updates the real register. But, the success check is wrong. pkey_alloc() considers any non-zero return code to indicate success where the pkey register will be modified. This fails to take negative return codes into account. Consider only a positive return value as a successful call. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210611164157.87AB4246@viggo.jf.intel.com Fixes: 5f23f6d082a9 ("x86/pkeys: Add self-tests") Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Tested-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V Cc: Ram Pai Cc: Sandipan Das Cc: Florian Weimer Cc: "Desnes A. Nunes do Rosario" Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Michal Suchanek Cc: Shuah Khan Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

selftests/vm/pkeys: fix alloc_random_pkey() to make it really, really random

2021-07-14T14:56:52+00:00

[ Upstream commit f36ef407628835a7d7fb3d235b1f1aac7022d9a3 ] Patch series "selftests/vm/pkeys: Bug fixes and a new test". There has been a lot of activity on the x86 front around the XSAVE architecture which is used to context-switch processor state (among other things). In addition, AMD has recently joined the protection keys club by adding processor support for PKU. The AMD implementation helped uncover a kernel bug around the PKRU "init state", which actually applied to Intel's implementation but was just harder to hit. This series adds a test which is expected to help find this class of bug both on AMD and Intel. All the work around pkeys on x86 also uncovered a few bugs in the selftest. This patch (of 4): The "random" pkey allocation code currently does the good old: srand((unsigned int)time(NULL)); *But*, it unfortunately does this on every random pkey allocation. There may be thousands of these a second. time() has a one second resolution. So, each time alloc_random_pkey() is called, the PRNG is *RESET* to time(). This is nasty. Normally, if you do: srand(); foo = rand(); bar = rand(); You'll be quite guaranteed that 'foo' and 'bar' are different. But, if you do: srand(1); foo = rand(); srand(1); bar = rand(); You are quite guaranteed that 'foo' and 'bar' are the *SAME*. The recent "fix" effectively forced the test case to use the same "random" pkey for the whole test, unless the test run crossed a second boundary. Only run srand() once at program startup. This explains some very odd and persistent test failures I've been seeing. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210611164153.91B76FB8@viggo.jf.intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210611164155.192D00FF@viggo.jf.intel.com Fixes: 6e373263ce07 ("selftests/vm/pkeys: fix alloc_random_pkey() to make it really random") Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Tested-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V Cc: Ram Pai Cc: Sandipan Das Cc: Florian Weimer Cc: "Desnes A. Nunes do Rosario" Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Michal Suchanek Cc: Shuah Khan Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

selftests/vm: fix out-of-tree build

2021-04-10T11:36:09+00:00

[ Upstream commit 19ec368cbc7ee1915e78c120b7a49c7f14734192 ] When building out-of-tree, attempting to make target from $(OUTPUT) directory: make[1]: *** No rule to make target '$(OUTPUT)/protection_keys.c', needed by '$(OUTPUT)/protection_keys_32'. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210315094700.522753-1-rong.a.chen@intel.com Signed-off-by: Rong Chen Reported-by: kernel test robot Cc: Shuah Khan Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

selftests/vm: fix building protection keys test

2021-01-12T19:18:14+00:00

[ Upstream commit 7cf22a1c88c05ea3807f95b1edfebb729016ae52 ] Commit d8cbe8bfa7d ("tools/testing/selftests/vm: fix build error") tried to include a ARCH check for powerpc, however ARCH is not defined in the Makefile before including lib.mk. This makes test building to skip on both x86 and powerpc. Fix the arch check by replacing it using machine type as it is already defined and used in the test. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201215100402.257376-1-harish@linux.ibm.com Fixes: d8cbe8bfa7d ("tools/testing/selftests/vm: fix build error") Signed-off-by: Harish Reviewed-by: Sandipan Das Cc: Shuah Khan Cc: Sandipan Das Cc: John Hubbard Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

userfaultfd: selftests: fix SIGSEGV if huge mmap fails

2020-12-06T18:19:07+00:00

The error handling in hugetlb_allocate_area() was incorrect for the hugetlb_shared test case. Previously the behavior was: - mmap a hugetlb area - If this fails, set the pointer to NULL, and carry on - mmap an alias of the same hugetlb fd - If this fails, munmap the original area If the original mmap failed, it's likely the second one did too. If both failed, we'd blindly try to munmap a NULL pointer, causing a SIGSEGV. Instead, "goto fail" so we return before trying to mmap the alias. This issue can be hit "in real life" by forgetting to set /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages (leaving it at 0), and then trying to run the hugetlb_shared test. Another small improvement is, when the original mmap fails, don't just print "it failed": perror(), so we can see *why*. :) Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Cc: Shuah Khan Cc: Peter Xu Cc: Joe Perches Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: David Alan Gilbert Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201204203443.2714693-1-axelrasmussen@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

tools/testing/selftests/vm: fix build error

2020-12-06T18:19:07+00:00

Only x86 and PowerPC implement the pkey-xxx.h, and an error was reported when compiling protection_keys.c. Add a Arch judgment to compile "protection_keys" in the Makefile. If other arch implement this, add the arch name to the Makefile. eg: ifneq (,$(findstring $(ARCH),powerpc mips ... )) Following build errors: pkey-helpers.h:93:2: error: #error Architecture not supported #error Architecture not supported pkey-helpers.h:96:20: error: `PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS' undeclared #define PKEY_MASK (PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS | PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE) ^ protection_keys.c:218:45: error: `PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE' undeclared pkey_assert(flags & (PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS | PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE)); ^ Signed-off-by: Xingxing Su Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Cc: Shuah Khan Cc: Sandipan Das Cc: John Hubbard Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: Brian Geffon Cc: Mina Almasry Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1606826876-30656-1-git-send-email-suxingxing@loongson.cn Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

selftests/vm: 10x speedup for hmm-tests

2020-10-18T16:27:09+00:00

This patch reduces the running time for hmm-tests from about 10+ seconds, to just under 1.0 second, for an approximately 10x speedup. That brings it in line with most of the other tests in selftests/vm, which mostly run in < 1 sec. This is done with a one-line change that simply reduces the number of iterations of several tests, from 256, to 10. Thanks to Ralph Campbell for suggesting changing NTIMES as a way to get the speedup. Suggested-by: Ralph Campbell Signed-off-by: John Hubbard Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Cc: SeongJae Park Cc: Shuah Khan Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201003011721.44238-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds