kernel/linux.git/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc, branch v4.19.237

selftests/powerpc: Fix "no_handler" EBB selftest

2021-07-20T14:16:09+00:00

[ Upstream commit 45677c9aebe926192e59475b35a1ff35ff2d4217 ] The "no_handler_test" in ebb selftests attempts to read the PMU registers twice via helper function "dump_ebb_state". First dump is just before closing of event and the second invocation is done after closing of the event. The original intention of second dump_ebb_state was to dump the state of registers at the end of the test when the counters are frozen. But this will be achieved with the first call itself since sample period is set to low value and PMU will be frozen by then. Hence patch removes the dump which was done before closing of the event. Reported-by: Shirisha Ganta Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev Tested-by: Nageswara R Sastry > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1621950703-1532-2-git-send-email-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

selftests/powerpc: Only test lwm/stmw on big endian

2021-02-07T13:48:38+00:00

[ Upstream commit dd3a44c06f7b4f14e90065bf05d62c255b20005f ] Newer binutils (>= 2.36) refuse to assemble lmw/stmw when building in little endian mode. That breaks compilation of our alignment handler test: /tmp/cco4l14N.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/cco4l14N.s:1440: Error: `lmw' invalid when little-endian /tmp/cco4l14N.s:1814: Error: `stmw' invalid when little-endian make[2]: *** [../../lib.mk:139: /output/kselftest/powerpc/alignment/alignment_handler] Error 1 These tests do pass on little endian machines, as the kernel will still emulate those instructions even when running little endian (which is arguably a kernel bug). But we don't really need to test that case, so ifdef those instructions out to get the alignment test building again. Reported-by: Libor Pechacek Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Tested-by: Libor Pechacek Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210119041800.3093047-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

selftests/powerpc: Purge extra count_pmc() calls of ebb selftests

2020-09-03T09:24:20+00:00

[ Upstream commit 3337bf41e0dd70b4064cdf60acdfcdc2d050066c ] An extra count on ebb_state.stats.pmc_count[PMC_INDEX(pmc)] is being per- formed when count_pmc() is used to reset PMCs on a few selftests. This extra pmc_count can occasionally invalidate results, such as the ones from cycles_test shown hereafter. The ebb_check_count() failed with an above the upper limit error due to the extra value on ebb_state.stats.pmc_count. Furthermore, this extra count is also indicated by extra PMC1 trace_log on the output of the cycle test (as well as on pmc56_overflow_test): ========== ... [21]: counter = 8 [22]: register SPRN_MMCR0 = 0x0000000080000080 [23]: register SPRN_PMC1 = 0x0000000080000004 [24]: counter = 9 [25]: register SPRN_MMCR0 = 0x0000000080000080 [26]: register SPRN_PMC1 = 0x0000000080000004 [27]: counter = 10 [28]: register SPRN_MMCR0 = 0x0000000080000080 [29]: register SPRN_PMC1 = 0x0000000080000004 >> [30]: register SPRN_PMC1 = 0x000000004000051e PMC1 count (0x280000546) above upper limit 0x2800003e8 (+0x15e) [FAIL] Test FAILED on line 52 failure: cycles ========== Signed-off-by: Desnes A. Nunes do Rosario Tested-by: Sachin Sant Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200626164737.21943-1-desnesn@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

selftests/powerpc: ptrace-pkey: Don't update expected UAMOR value

2020-08-21T09:05:36+00:00

[ Upstream commit 3563b9bea0ca7f53e4218b5e268550341a49f333 ] With commit 4a4a5e5d2aad ("powerpc/pkeys: key allocation/deallocation must not change pkey registers") we are not updating UAMOR on key allocation. So don't update the expected uamor value in the test. Fixes: 4a4a5e5d2aad ("powerpc/pkeys: key allocation/deallocation must not change pkey registers") Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200709032946.881753-23-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

selftests/powerpc: ptrace-pkey: Update the test to mark an invalid pkey correctly

2020-08-21T09:05:36+00:00

[ Upstream commit 0eaa3b5ca7b5a76e3783639c828498343be66a01 ] Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200709032946.881753-22-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

selftests/powerpc: ptrace-pkey: Rename variables to make it easier to follow code

2020-08-21T09:05:35+00:00

[ Upstream commit 9a11f12e0a6c374b3ef1ce81e32ce477d28eb1b8 ] Rename variable to indicate that they are invalid values which we will use to test ptrace update of pkeys. Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200709032946.881753-21-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

selftests/powerpc: Fix online CPU selection

2020-08-19T06:15:00+00:00

[ Upstream commit dfa03fff86027e58c8dba5c03ae68150d4e513ad ] The size of the CPU affinity mask must be large enough for systems with a very large number of CPUs. Otherwise, tests which try to determine the first online CPU by calling sched_getaffinity() will fail. This makes sure that the size of the allocated affinity mask is dependent on the number of CPUs as reported by get_nprocs_conf(). Fixes: 3752e453f6ba ("selftests/powerpc: Add tests of PMU EBBs") Reported-by: Shirisha Ganta Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das Reviewed-by: Kamalesh Babulal Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a408c4b8e9a23bb39b539417a21eb0ff47bb5127.1596084858.git.sandipan@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

selftests/powerpc: Fix CPU affinity for child process

2020-08-19T06:15:00+00:00

[ Upstream commit 854eb5022be04f81e318765f089f41a57c8e5d83 ] On systems with large number of cpus, test fails trying to set affinity by calling sched_setaffinity() with smaller size for affinity mask. This patch fixes it by making sure that the size of allocated affinity mask is dependent on the number of CPUs as reported by get_nprocs(). Fixes: 00b7ec5c9cf3 ("selftests/powerpc: Import Anton's context_switch2 benchmark") Reported-by: Shirisha Ganta Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das Signed-off-by: Harish Reviewed-by: Kamalesh Babulal Reviewed-by: Satheesh Rajendran Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200609081423.529664-1-harish@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

selftests/powerpc: Skip test instead of failing

2019-12-13T07:51:45+00:00

[ Upstream commit eafcd8e3fbad4f426a40ed2b6a8c697c3a4ef36a ] Current core-pkey selftest fails if the test runs without privileges to write into the core pattern file (/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern). This causes the test to fail and give the impression that the subsystem being tested is broken, when, in fact, the test is being executed without the proper privileges. This is the current error: test: core_pkey tags: git_version:v4.19-3-g9e3363be9bce-dirty Error writing to core_pattern file: Permission denied failure: core_pkey This patch simply skips this test if it runs without the proper privileges, avoiding this undesired failure. CC: Tyrel Datwyler CC: Thiago Jung Bauermann Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

selftests/powerpc: Allocate base registers

2019-12-13T07:51:44+00:00

[ Upstream commit 5249497a7bb6334fcc128588d6a7e1e21786515a ] Some ptrace selftests are passing input operands using a constraint that can allocate any register for the operand, and using these registers on load/store operations. If the register allocated by the compiler happens to be zero (r0), it might cause an invalid memory address access, since load and store operations consider the content of 0x0 address if the base register is r0, instead of the content of the r0 register. For example: r1 := 0xdeadbeef r0 := 0xdeadbeef ld r2, 0(1) /* will load into r2 the content of r1 address */ ld r2, 0(0) /* will load into r2 the content of 0x0 */ In order to avoid this possible problem, the inline assembly constraint should be aware that these registers will be used as a base register, thus, r0 should not be allocated. Other than that, this patch removes inline assembly operands that are not used by the tests. Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao Reviewed-by: Segher Boessenkool Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin