kernel/linux.git/tools/testing/selftests/bpf, branch v6.6.132

selftests/bpf: veristat: fix printing order in output_stats()

2026-03-04T12:19:30+00:00

[ Upstream commit c286e7e9d1f1f3d90ad11c37e896f582b02d19c4 ] The order of the variables in the printf() doesn't match the text and therefore veristat prints something like this: Done. Processed 24 files, 0 programs. Skipped 62 files, 0 programs. When it should print: Done. Processed 24 files, 62 programs. Skipped 0 files, 0 programs. Fix the order of variables in the printf() call. Fixes: 518fee8bfaf2 ("selftests/bpf: make veristat skip non-BPF and failing-to-open BPF objects") Tested-by: Eduard Zingerman Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251231221052.759396-1-puranjay@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf/selftests: test_select_reuseport_kern: Remove unused header

2026-02-06T15:48:30+00:00

commit 93cf4e537ed0c5bd9ba6cbdb2c33864547c1442f upstream. test_select_reuseport_kern.c is currently including , but it does not use any definition from there. Remove stdlib.h inclusion from test_select_reuseport_kern.c Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250227-remove_wrong_header-v1-1-bc94eb4e2f73@bootlin.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov [shung-hsi.yu: Fix compilation error mentioned in footer of Alexis' patch with newer glibc header: [...] CLNG-BPF [test_progs-cpuv4] test_select_reuseport_kern.bpf.o In file included from progs/test_select_reuseport_kern.c:4: /usr/include/bits/floatn.h:83:52: error: unsupported machine mode '__TC__' 83 | typedef _Complex float __cfloat128 __attribute__ ((__mode__ (__TC__))); | ^ /usr/include/bits/floatn.h:97:9: error: __float128 is not supported on this target 97 | typedef __float128 _Float128; I'm not certain when the problem starts to occur, but I'm quite sure test_select_reuseport_kern.c were not meant to be using the C standard library in the first place.] Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

selftests/bpf: Check for timeout in perf_link test

2026-01-30T09:27:41+00:00

commit e6c209da7e0e9aaf955a7b59e91ed78c2b6c96fb upstream. Recently perf_link test started unreliably failing on libbpf CI: * https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/actions/runs/11260672407/job/31312405473 * https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/actions/runs/11260992334/job/31315514626 * https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/actions/runs/11263162459/job/31320458251 Part of the test is running a dummy loop for a while and then checking for a counter incremented by the test program. Instead of waiting for an arbitrary number of loop iterations once, check for the test counter in a loop and use get_time_ns() helper to enforce a 100ms timeout. v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/zuRd072x9tumn2iN4wDNs5av0nu5nekMNV4PkR-YwCT10eFFTrUtZBRkLWFbrcCe7guvLStGQlhibo8qWojCO7i2-NGajes5GYIyynexD-w=@pm.me/ Signed-off-by: Ihor Solodrai Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241011153104.249800-1-ihor.solodrai@pm.me Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: Support specifying linear xdp packet data size for BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN

2026-01-17T15:30:01+00:00

[ Upstream commit fe9544ed1a2e9217b2c5285c3a4ac0dc5a38bd7b ] To test bpf_xdp_pull_data(), an xdp packet containing fragments as well as free linear data area after xdp->data_end needs to be created. However, bpf_prog_test_run_xdp() always fills the linear area with data_in before creating fragments, leaving no space to pull data. This patch will allow users to specify the linear data size through ctx->data_end. Currently, ctx_in->data_end must match data_size_in and will not be the final ctx->data_end seen by xdp programs. This is because ctx->data_end is populated according to the xdp_buff passed to test_run. The linear data area available in an xdp_buff, max_linear_sz, is alawys filled up before copying data_in into fragments. This patch will allow users to specify the size of data that goes into the linear area. When ctx_in->data_end is different from data_size_in, only ctx_in->data_end bytes of data will be put into the linear area when creating the xdp_buff. While ctx_in->data_end will be allowed to be different from data_size_in, it cannot be larger than the data_size_in as there will be no data to copy from user space. If it is larger than the maximum linear data area size, the layout suggested by the user will not be honored. Data beyond max_linear_sz bytes will still be copied into fragments. Finally, since it is possible for a NIC to produce a xdp_buff with empty linear data area, allow it when calling bpf_test_init() from bpf_prog_test_run_xdp() so that we can test XDP kfuncs with such xdp_buff. This is done by moving lower-bound check to callers as most of them already do except bpf_prog_test_run_skb(). The change also fixes a bug that allows passing an xdp_buff with data < ETH_HLEN. This can happen when ctx is used and metadata is at least ETH_HLEN. Signed-off-by: Amery Hung Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250922233356.3356453-7-ameryhung@gmail.com Stable-dep-of: e558cca21779 ("bpf, test_run: Subtract size of xdp_frame from allowed metadata size") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Fix an issue in bpf_prog_test_run_xdp when page size greater than 4K

2026-01-17T15:30:00+00:00

[ Upstream commit 4fc012daf9c074772421c904357abf586336b1ca ] The bpf selftest xdp_adjust_tail/xdp_adjust_frags_tail_grow failed on arm64 with 64KB page: xdp_adjust_tail/xdp_adjust_frags_tail_grow:FAIL In bpf_prog_test_run_xdp(), the xdp->frame_sz is set to 4K, but later on when constructing frags, with 64K page size, the frag data_len could be more than 4K. This will cause problems in bpf_xdp_frags_increase_tail(). To fix the failure, the xdp->frame_sz is set to be PAGE_SIZE so kernel can test different page size properly. With the kernel change, the user space and bpf prog needs adjustment. Currently, the MAX_SKB_FRAGS default value is 17, so for 4K page, the maximum packet size will be less than 68K. To test 64K page, a bigger maximum packet size than 68K is desired. So two different functions are implemented for subtest xdp_adjust_frags_tail_grow. Depending on different page size, different data input/output sizes are used to adapt with different page size. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250612035032.2207498-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Stable-dep-of: e558cca21779 ("bpf, test_run: Subtract size of xdp_frame from allowed metadata size") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

selftests/bpf: Improve reliability of test_perf_branches_no_hw()

2026-01-11T14:21:29+00:00

[ Upstream commit ae24fc8a16b0481ea8c5acbc66453c49ec0431c4 ] Currently, test_perf_branches_no_hw() relies on the busy loop within test_perf_branches_common() being slow enough to allow at least one perf event sample tick to occur before starting to tear down the backing perf event BPF program. With a relatively small fixed iteration count of 1,000,000, this is not guaranteed on modern fast CPUs, resulting in the test run to subsequently fail with the following: bpf_testmod.ko is already unloaded. Loading bpf_testmod.ko... Successfully loaded bpf_testmod.ko. test_perf_branches_common:PASS:test_perf_branches_load 0 nsec test_perf_branches_common:PASS:attach_perf_event 0 nsec test_perf_branches_common:PASS:set_affinity 0 nsec check_good_sample:PASS:output not valid 0 nsec check_good_sample:PASS:read_branches_size 0 nsec check_good_sample:PASS:read_branches_stack 0 nsec check_good_sample:PASS:read_branches_stack 0 nsec check_good_sample:PASS:read_branches_global 0 nsec check_good_sample:PASS:read_branches_global 0 nsec check_good_sample:PASS:read_branches_size 0 nsec test_perf_branches_no_hw:PASS:perf_event_open 0 nsec test_perf_branches_common:PASS:test_perf_branches_load 0 nsec test_perf_branches_common:PASS:attach_perf_event 0 nsec test_perf_branches_common:PASS:set_affinity 0 nsec check_bad_sample:FAIL:output not valid no valid sample from prog Summary: 0/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED Successfully unloaded bpf_testmod.ko. On a modern CPU (i.e. one with a 3.5 GHz clock rate), executing 1 million increments of a volatile integer can take significantly less than 1 millisecond. If the spin loop and detachment of the perf event BPF program elapses before the first 1 ms sampling interval elapses, the perf event will never end up firing. Fix this by bumping the loop iteration counter a little within test_perf_branches_common(), along with ensuring adding another loop termination condition which is directly influenced by the backing perf event BPF program executing. Notably, a concious decision was made to not adjust the sample_freq value as that is just not a reliable way to go about fixing the problem. It effectively still leaves the race window open. Fixes: 67306f84ca78c ("selftests/bpf: Add bpf_read_branch_records() selftest") Signed-off-by: Matt Bobrowski Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251119143540.2911424-1-mattbobrowski@google.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

selftests/bpf: skip test_perf_branches_hw() on unsupported platforms

2026-01-11T14:21:28+00:00

[ Upstream commit 27746aaf1b20172f0859546c4a3e82eca459f680 ] Gracefully skip the test_perf_branches_hw subtest on platforms that do not support LBR or require specialized perf event attributes to enable branch sampling. For example, AMD's Milan (Zen 3) supports BRS rather than traditional LBR. This requires specific configurations (attr.type = PERF_TYPE_RAW, attr.config = RETIRED_TAKEN_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS) that differ from the generic setup used within this test. Notably, it also probably doesn't hold much value to special case perf event configurations for selected micro architectures. Fixes: 67306f84ca78c ("selftests/bpf: Add bpf_read_branch_records() selftest") Signed-off-by: Matt Bobrowski Acked-by: Song Liu Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251120142059.2836181-1-mattbobrowski@google.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

selftests/bpf: Fix failure paths in send_signal test

2026-01-11T14:21:24+00:00

[ Upstream commit c13339039891dbdfa6c1972f0483bd07f610b776 ] When test_send_signal_kern__open_and_load() fails parent closes the pipe which cases ASSERT_EQ(read(pipe_p2c...)) to fail, but child continues and enters infinite loop, while parent is stuck in wait(NULL). Other error paths have similar issue, so kill the child before waiting on it. The bug was discovered while compiling all of selftests with -O1 instead of -O2 which caused progs/test_send_signal_kern.c to fail to load. Fixes: ab8b7f0cb358 ("tools/bpf: Add self tests for bpf_send_signal_thread()") Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20251113171153.2583-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

selftests/bpf: Upon failures, exit with code 1 in test_xsk.sh

2025-11-24T09:29:18+00:00

[ Upstream commit 2a912258c90e895363c0ffc0be8a47f112ab67b7 ] Currently, even if some subtests fails, the end result will still yield "ok 1 selftests: bpf: test_xsk.sh". Fix it by exiting with 1 if there are any failures. Signed-off-by: Ricardo B. Marlière Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Acked-by: Magnus Karlsson Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250828-selftests-bpf-test_xsk_ret-v1-1-e6656c01f397@suse.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

selftests/bpf: Fix bpf_prog_detach2 usage in test_lirc_mode2

2025-11-24T09:29:18+00:00

[ Upstream commit 98857d111c53954aa038fcbc4cf48873e4240f7c ] Commit e9fc3ce99b34 ("libbpf: Streamline error reporting for high-level APIs") redefined the way that bpf_prog_detach2() returns. Therefore, adapt the usage in test_lirc_mode2_user.c. Signed-off-by: Ricardo B. Marlière Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250828-selftests-bpf-v1-1-c7811cd8b98c@suse.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin