kernel/linux.git/tools/testing/selftests/bpf, branch v4.14.152

bpf: Fix selftests are changes for CVE 2019-7308

2019-04-20T07:15:10+00:00

The changes to fix the CVE 2019-7308 make the bpf verifier stricter with respect to operations that were allowed earlier in unprivileged mode. Fixup the test cases so that the error messages now correctly reflect pointer arithmetic going out of range for tests. Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf, selftests: fix handling of sparse CPU allocations

2019-03-13T21:03:20+00:00

[ Upstream commit 1bb54c4071f585ebef56ce8fdfe6026fa2cbcddd ] Previously, bpf_num_possible_cpus() had a bug when calculating a number of possible CPUs in the case of sparse CPU allocations, as it was considering only the first range or element of /sys/devices/system/cpu/possible. E.g. in the case of "0,2-3" (CPU 1 is not available), the function returned 1 instead of 3. This patch fixes the function by making it parse all CPU ranges and elements. Signed-off-by: Martynas Pumputis Acked-by: Yonghong Song Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

selftests/bpf: use __bpf_constant_htons in test_prog.c

2019-02-12T18:46:04+00:00

[ Upstream commit a0517a0f7ef23550b4484c37e2b9c2d32abebf64 ] For some reason, my older GCC (< 4.8) isn't smart enough to optimize the !__builtin_constant_p() branch in bpf_htons, I see: error: implicit declaration of function '__builtin_bswap16' Let's use __bpf_constant_htons as suggested by Daniel Borkmann. I tried to use simple htons, but it produces the following: test_progs.c:54:17: error: braced-group within expression allowed only inside a function .eth.h_proto = htons(ETH_P_IP), Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf: Fix verifier log string check for bad alignment.

2018-12-21T13:13:13+00:00

[ Upstream commit c01ac66b38660f2b507ccd0b75d28e3002d56fbb ] The message got changed a lot time ago. This was responsible for 36 test case failures on sparc64. Fixes: f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking") Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

selftests/bpf: fix a typo in map in map test

2018-09-19T20:43:38+00:00

[ Upstream commit 0069fb854364da79fd99236ea620affc8e1152d5 ] Commit fbeb1603bf4e ("bpf: verifier: MOV64 don't mark dst reg unbounded") revealed a typo in commit fb30d4b71214 ("bpf: Add tests for map-in-map"): BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, 0) was used instead of BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0). I've noticed the problem by running bpf kselftests. Fixes: fb30d4b71214 ("bpf: Add tests for map-in-map") Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin Cc: Martin KaFai Lau Cc: Arthur Fabre Cc: Daniel Borkmann Cc: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

selftests: bpf: notification about privilege required to run test_kmod.sh testing script

2018-08-24T11:09:04+00:00

[ Upstream commit 81e167c2a216e7b54e6add9d2badcda267fe33b1 ] The test_kmod.sh script require root privilege for the successful execution of the test. This patch is to notify the user about the privilege the script demands for the successful execution of the test. Signed-off-by: Jeffrin Jose T (Rajagiri SET) Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

selftests/bpf/test_maps: exit child process without error in ENOMEM case

2018-05-30T05:52:01+00:00

[ Upstream commit 80475c48c6a8a65171e035e0915dc7996b5a0a65 ] test_maps contains a series of stress tests, and previously it will break the rest tests when it failed to alloc memory. ----------------------- Failed to create hashmap key=8 value=262144 'Cannot allocate memory' Failed to create hashmap key=16 value=262144 'Cannot allocate memory' Failed to create hashmap key=8 value=262144 'Cannot allocate memory' Failed to create hashmap key=8 value=262144 'Cannot allocate memory' test_maps: test_maps.c:955: run_parallel: Assertion `status == 0' failed. Aborted not ok 1..3 selftests: test_maps [FAIL] ----------------------- after this patch, the rest tests will be continue when it occurs an ENOMEM failure CC: Alexei Starovoitov CC: Philip Li Suggested-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: test_maps: cleanup sockmaps when test ends

2018-04-26T09:02:10+00:00

[ Upstream commit 783687810e986a15ffbf86c516a1a48ff37f38f7 ] Bug: BPF programs and maps related to sockmaps test exist in memory even after test_maps ends. This patch fixes it as a short term workaround (sockmap kernel side needs real fixing) by empyting sockmaps when test ends. Fixes: 6f6d33f3b3d0f ("bpf: selftests add sockmap tests") Signed-off-by: Prashant Bhole [ daniel: Note on workaround. ] Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: allow xadd only on aligned memory

2018-03-11T15:23:22+00:00

[ upstream commit ca36960211eb228bcbc7aaebfa0d027368a94c60 ] The requirements around atomic_add() / atomic64_add() resp. their JIT implementations differ across architectures. E.g. while x86_64 seems just fine with BPF's xadd on unaligned memory, on arm64 it triggers via interpreter but also JIT the following crash: [ 830.864985] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff8097d7ed6703 [...] [ 830.916161] Internal error: Oops: 96000021 [#1] SMP [ 830.984755] CPU: 37 PID: 2788 Comm: test_verifier Not tainted 4.16.0-rc2+ #8 [ 830.991790] Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 /BC11SPCD, BIOS 1.29 07/17/2017 [ 830.998998] pstate: 80400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO) [ 831.003793] pc : __ll_sc_atomic_add+0x4/0x18 [ 831.008055] lr : ___bpf_prog_run+0x1198/0x1588 [ 831.012485] sp : ffff00001ccabc20 [ 831.015786] x29: ffff00001ccabc20 x28: ffff8017d56a0f00 [ 831.021087] x27: 0000000000000001 x26: 0000000000000000 [ 831.026387] x25: 000000c168d9db98 x24: 0000000000000000 [ 831.031686] x23: ffff000008203878 x22: ffff000009488000 [ 831.036986] x21: ffff000008b14e28 x20: ffff00001ccabcb0 [ 831.042286] x19: ffff0000097b5080 x18: 0000000000000a03 [ 831.047585] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 831.052885] x15: 0000ffffaeca8000 x14: 0000000000000000 [ 831.058184] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 831.063484] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: 0000000000000000 [ 831.068783] x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : 0000000000000000 [ 831.074083] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 000580d428000000 [ 831.079383] x5 : 0000000000000018 x4 : 0000000000000000 [ 831.084682] x3 : ffff00001ccabcb0 x2 : 0000000000000001 [ 831.089982] x1 : ffff8097d7ed6703 x0 : 0000000000000001 [ 831.095282] Process test_verifier (pid: 2788, stack limit = 0x0000000018370044) [ 831.102577] Call trace: [ 831.105012] __ll_sc_atomic_add+0x4/0x18 [ 831.108923] __bpf_prog_run32+0x4c/0x70 [ 831.112748] bpf_test_run+0x78/0xf8 [ 831.116224] bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0xb4/0x120 [ 831.120567] SyS_bpf+0x77c/0x1110 [ 831.123873] el0_svc_naked+0x30/0x34 [ 831.127437] Code: 97fffe97 17ffffec 00000000 f9800031 (885f7c31) Reason for this is because memory is required to be aligned. In case of BPF, we always enforce alignment in terms of stack access, but not when accessing map values or packet data when the underlying arch (e.g. arm64) has CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS set. xadd on packet data that is local to us anyway is just wrong, so forbid this case entirely. The only place where xadd makes sense in fact are map values; xadd on stack is wrong as well, but it's been around for much longer. Specifically enforce strict alignment in case of xadd, so that we handle this case generically and avoid such crashes in the first place. Fixes: 17a5267067f3 ("bpf: verifier (add verifier core)") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf, arm64: fix out of bounds access in tail call

2018-03-11T15:23:22+00:00

[ upstream commit 16338a9b3ac30740d49f5dfed81bac0ffa53b9c7 ] I recently noticed a crash on arm64 when feeding a bogus index into BPF tail call helper. The crash would not occur when the interpreter is used, but only in case of JIT. Output looks as follows: [ 347.007486] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffb850e96492510 [...] [ 347.043065] [fffb850e96492510] address between user and kernel address ranges [ 347.050205] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] SMP [...] [ 347.190829] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 [ 347.196128] x11: fffc047ebe782800 x10: ffff808fd7d0fd10 [ 347.201427] x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : 0000000000000000 [ 347.206726] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 001c991738000000 [ 347.212025] x5 : 0000000000000018 x4 : 000000000000ba5a [ 347.217325] x3 : 00000000000329c4 x2 : ffff808fd7cf0500 [ 347.222625] x1 : ffff808fd7d0fc00 x0 : ffff808fd7cf0500 [ 347.227926] Process test_verifier (pid: 4548, stack limit = 0x000000007467fa61) [ 347.235221] Call trace: [ 347.237656] 0xffff000002f3a4fc [ 347.240784] bpf_test_run+0x78/0xf8 [ 347.244260] bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x148/0x230 [ 347.248694] SyS_bpf+0x77c/0x1110 [ 347.251999] el0_svc_naked+0x30/0x34 [ 347.255564] Code: 9100075a d280220a 8b0a002a d37df04b (f86b694b) [...] In this case the index used in BPF r3 is the same as in r1 at the time of the call, meaning we fed a pointer as index; here, it had the value 0xffff808fd7cf0500 which sits in x2. While I found tail calls to be working in general (also for hitting the error cases), I noticed the following in the code emission: # bpftool p d j i 988 [...] 38: ldr w10, [x1,x10] 3c: cmp w2, w10 40: b.ge 0x000000000000007c <-- signed cmp 44: mov x10, #0x20 // #32 48: cmp x26, x10 4c: b.gt 0x000000000000007c 50: add x26, x26, #0x1 54: mov x10, #0x110 // #272 58: add x10, x1, x10 5c: lsl x11, x2, #3 60: ldr x11, [x10,x11] <-- faulting insn (f86b694b) 64: cbz x11, 0x000000000000007c [...] Meaning, the tests passed because commit ddb55992b04d ("arm64: bpf: implement bpf_tail_call() helper") was using signed compares instead of unsigned which as a result had the test wrongly passing. Change this but also the tail call count test both into unsigned and cap the index as u32. Latter we did as well in 90caccdd8cc0 ("bpf: fix bpf_tail_call() x64 JIT") and is needed in addition here, too. Tested on HiSilicon Hi1616. Result after patch: # bpftool p d j i 268 [...] 38: ldr w10, [x1,x10] 3c: add w2, w2, #0x0 40: cmp w2, w10 44: b.cs 0x0000000000000080 48: mov x10, #0x20 // #32 4c: cmp x26, x10 50: b.hi 0x0000000000000080 54: add x26, x26, #0x1 58: mov x10, #0x110 // #272 5c: add x10, x1, x10 60: lsl x11, x2, #3 64: ldr x11, [x10,x11] 68: cbz x11, 0x0000000000000080 [...] Fixes: ddb55992b04d ("arm64: bpf: implement bpf_tail_call() helper") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman