kernel/linux.git/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task_stack.c, branch v7.1.7

selftests/bpf: drop unnecessary bpf_iter.h type duplication

2024-10-30T00:43:29+00:00

Drop bpf_iter.h header which uses vmlinux.h but re-defines a bunch of iterator structures and some of BPF constants for use in BPF iterator selftests. None of that is necessary when fresh vmlinux.h header is generated for vmlinux image that matches latest selftests. So drop ugly hacks and have a nice plain vmlinux.h usage everywhere. We could do the same with all the kfunc __ksym redefinitions, but that has dependency on very fresh pahole, so I'm not addressing that here. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241029203919.1948941-1-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

selftests/bpf: Add assert for user stacks in test_task_stack

2023-11-14T02:39:38+00:00

This is a follow up to: commit b8e3a87a627b ("bpf: Add crosstask check to __bpf_get_stack"). This test ensures that the task iterator only gets a single user stack (for the current task). Signed-off-by: Jordan Rome Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231112023010.144675-1-linux@jordanrome.com

libbpf: Move BPF_SEQ_PRINTF and BPF_SNPRINTF to bpf_helpers.h

2021-05-26T17:45:41+00:00

These macros are convenient wrappers around the bpf_seq_printf and bpf_snprintf helpers. They are currently provided by bpf_tracing.h which targets low level tracing primitives. bpf_helpers.h is a better fit. The __bpf_narg and __bpf_apply are needed in both files and provided twice. __bpf_empty isn't used anywhere and is removed from bpf_tracing.h Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko Signed-off-by: Florent Revest Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210526164643.2881368-1-revest@chromium.org

bpf/selftests: Add bpf_get_task_stack retval bounds test_prog

2021-04-20T01:23:33+00:00

Add a libbpf test prog which feeds bpf_get_task_stack's return value into seq_write after confirming it's positive. No attempt to bound the value from above is made. Load will fail if verifier does not refine retval range based on buf sz input to bpf_get_task_stack. Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Song Liu Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210416204704.2816874-4-davemarchevsky@fb.com

selftests/bpf: Fix compilation error of bpf_iter_task_stack.c

2020-07-03T21:25:40+00:00

BPF selftests show a compilation error as follows: libbpf: invalid relo for 'entries' in special section 0xfff2; forgot to initialize global var?.. Fix it by initializing 'entries' to zeros. Fixes: c7568114bc56 ("selftests/bpf: Add bpf_iter test with bpf_get_task_stack()") Reported-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Signed-off-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200703181719.3747072-1-songliubraving@fb.com

selftests/bpf: Add bpf_iter test with bpf_get_task_stack()

2020-07-01T15:23:59+00:00

The new test is similar to other bpf_iter tests. It dumps all /proc//stack to a seq_file. Here is some example output: pid: 2873 num_entries: 3 [<0>] worker_thread+0xc6/0x380 [<0>] kthread+0x135/0x150 [<0>] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 pid: 2874 num_entries: 9 [<0>] __bpf_get_stack+0x15e/0x250 [<0>] bpf_prog_22a400774977bb30_dump_task_stack+0x4a/0xb3c [<0>] bpf_iter_run_prog+0x81/0x170 [<0>] __task_seq_show+0x58/0x80 [<0>] bpf_seq_read+0x1c3/0x3b0 [<0>] vfs_read+0x9e/0x170 [<0>] ksys_read+0xa7/0xe0 [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xa0 [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Note: bpf_iter test as-is doesn't print the contents of the seq_file. To see the example above, it is necessary to add printf() to do_dummy_read. Signed-off-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko Acked-by: Yonghong Song Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200630062846.664389-5-songliubraving@fb.com