kernel/linux.git/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs, branch v6.4

selftests/bpf: Fix conflicts with built-in functions in bench_local_storage_create

2023-03-31T18:36:18+00:00

The fork function in gcc is considered a built in function due to being used by libgcov when building with gnu extensions. Rename fork to sched_process_fork to prevent this conflict. See details: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/d1c38823924506d389ca58d02926ace21bdf82fa https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82457 Fixes the following error: In file included from progs/bench_local_storage_create.c:6: progs/bench_local_storage_create.c:43:14: error: conflicting types for built-in function 'fork'; expected 'int(void)' [-Werror=builtin-declaration-mismatch] 43 | int BPF_PROG(fork, struct task_struct *parent, struct task_struct *child) | ^~~~ Fixes: cbe9d93d58b1 ("selftests/bpf: Add bench for task storage creation") Signed-off-by: James Hilliard Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230331075848.1642814-1-james.hilliard1@gmail.com

selftests/bpf: Add bench for task storage creation

2023-03-26T02:52:52+00:00

This patch adds a task storage benchmark to the existing local-storage-create benchmark. For task storage, ./bench --storage-type task --batch-size 32: bpf_ma: Summary: creates 30.456 ± 0.507k/s ( 30.456k/prod), 6.08 kmallocs/create no bpf_ma: Summary: creates 31.962 ± 0.486k/s ( 31.962k/prod), 6.13 kmallocs/create ./bench --storage-type task --batch-size 64: bpf_ma: Summary: creates 30.197 ± 1.476k/s ( 30.197k/prod), 6.08 kmallocs/create no bpf_ma: Summary: creates 31.103 ± 0.297k/s ( 31.103k/prod), 6.13 kmallocs/create Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230322215246.1675516-6-martin.lau@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

selftests/bpf: Add local-storage-create benchmark

2023-03-10T19:06:02+00:00

This patch tests how many kmallocs is needed to create and free a batch of UDP sockets and each socket has a 64bytes bpf storage. It also measures how fast the UDP sockets can be created. The result is from my qemu setup. Before bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free: ./bench -p 1 local-storage-create Setting up benchmark 'local-storage-create'... Benchmark 'local-storage-create' started. Iter 0 ( 73.193us): creates 213.552k/s (213.552k/prod), 3.09 kmallocs/create Iter 1 (-20.724us): creates 211.908k/s (211.908k/prod), 3.09 kmallocs/create Iter 2 ( 9.280us): creates 212.574k/s (212.574k/prod), 3.12 kmallocs/create Iter 3 ( 11.039us): creates 213.209k/s (213.209k/prod), 3.12 kmallocs/create Iter 4 (-11.411us): creates 213.351k/s (213.351k/prod), 3.12 kmallocs/create Iter 5 ( -7.915us): creates 214.754k/s (214.754k/prod), 3.12 kmallocs/create Iter 6 ( 11.317us): creates 210.942k/s (210.942k/prod), 3.12 kmallocs/create Summary: creates 212.789 ± 1.310k/s (212.789k/prod), 3.12 kmallocs/create After bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free: ./bench -p 1 local-storage-create Setting up benchmark 'local-storage-create'... Benchmark 'local-storage-create' started. Iter 0 ( 68.265us): creates 243.984k/s (243.984k/prod), 1.04 kmallocs/create Iter 1 ( 30.357us): creates 238.424k/s (238.424k/prod), 1.04 kmallocs/create Iter 2 (-18.712us): creates 232.963k/s (232.963k/prod), 1.04 kmallocs/create Iter 3 (-15.885us): creates 238.879k/s (238.879k/prod), 1.04 kmallocs/create Iter 4 ( 5.590us): creates 237.490k/s (237.490k/prod), 1.04 kmallocs/create Iter 5 ( 8.577us): creates 237.521k/s (237.521k/prod), 1.04 kmallocs/create Iter 6 ( -6.263us): creates 238.508k/s (238.508k/prod), 1.04 kmallocs/create Summary: creates 237.298 ± 2.198k/s (237.298k/prod), 1.04 kmallocs/create Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308065936.1550103-18-martin.lau@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

selftest/bpf/benchs: Add benchmark for hashmap lookups

2023-02-16T00:29:31+00:00

Add a new benchmark which measures hashmap lookup operations speed. A user can control the following parameters of the benchmark: * key_size (max 1024): the key size to use * max_entries: the hashmap max entries * nr_entries: the number of entries to insert/lookup * nr_loops: the number of loops for the benchmark * map_flags The hashmap flags passed to BPF_MAP_CREATE The BPF program performing the benchmarks calls two nested bpf_loop: bpf_loop(nr_loops/nr_entries) bpf_loop(nr_entries) bpf_map_lookup() So the nr_loops determines the number of actual map lookups. All lookups are successful. Example (the output is generated on a AMD Ryzen 9 3950X machine): for nr_entries in `seq 4096 4096 65536`; do echo -n "$((nr_entries*100/65536))% full: "; sudo ./bench -d2 -a bpf-hashmap-lookup --key_size=4 --nr_entries=$nr_entries --max_entries=65536 --nr_loops=1000000 --map_flags=0x40 | grep cpu; done 6% full: cpu01: lookup 50.739M ± 0.018M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~19ms) 12% full: cpu01: lookup 47.751M ± 0.015M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~20ms) 18% full: cpu01: lookup 45.153M ± 0.013M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~22ms) 25% full: cpu01: lookup 43.826M ± 0.014M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~22ms) 31% full: cpu01: lookup 41.971M ± 0.012M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~23ms) 37% full: cpu01: lookup 41.034M ± 0.015M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~24ms) 43% full: cpu01: lookup 39.946M ± 0.012M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~25ms) 50% full: cpu01: lookup 38.256M ± 0.014M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~26ms) 56% full: cpu01: lookup 36.580M ± 0.018M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~27ms) 62% full: cpu01: lookup 36.252M ± 0.012M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~27ms) 68% full: cpu01: lookup 35.200M ± 0.012M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~28ms) 75% full: cpu01: lookup 34.061M ± 0.009M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~29ms) 81% full: cpu01: lookup 34.374M ± 0.010M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~29ms) 87% full: cpu01: lookup 33.244M ± 0.011M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~30ms) 93% full: cpu01: lookup 32.182M ± 0.013M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~31ms) 100% full: cpu01: lookup 31.497M ± 0.016M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~31ms) Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230213091519.1202813-8-aspsk@isovalent.com

selftest/bpf/benchs: Make quiet option common

2023-02-16T00:29:31+00:00

The "local-storage-tasks-trace" benchmark has a `--quiet` option. Move it to the list of common options, so that the main code and other benchmarks can use (new) env.quiet variable. Patch the run_bench_local_storage_rcu_tasks_trace.sh helper script accordingly. Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230213091519.1202813-6-aspsk@isovalent.com

selftest/bpf/benchs: Remove an unused header

2023-02-16T00:29:31+00:00

The benchs/bench_bpf_hashmap_full_update.c doesn't set a custom argp, so it shouldn't include the header. Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230213091519.1202813-5-aspsk@isovalent.com

selftest/bpf/benchs: Enhance argp parsing

2023-02-16T00:29:31+00:00

To parse command line the bench utility uses the argp_parse() function. This function takes as an argument a parent 'struct argp' structure which defines common command line options and an array of children 'struct argp' structures which defines additional command line options for particular benchmarks. This implementation doesn't allow benchmarks to share option names, e.g., if two benchmarks want to use, say, the --option option, then only one of them will succeed (the first one encountered in the array). This will be convenient if same option names could be used in different benchmarks (with the same semantics, e.g., --nr_loops=N). Fix this by calling the argp_parse() function twice. The first call is the same as it was before, with all children argps, and helps to find the benchmark name and to print a combined help message if anything is wrong. Given the name, we can call the argp_parse the second time, but now the children array points only to a correct benchmark thus always calling the correct parsers. (If there's no a specific list of arguments, then only one call to argp_parse will be done.) Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230213091519.1202813-4-aspsk@isovalent.com

selftest/bpf/benchs: Make a function static in bpf_hashmap_full_update

2023-02-16T00:29:31+00:00

The hashmap_report_final callback function defined in the benchs/bench_bpf_hashmap_full_update.c file should be static. Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230213091519.1202813-3-aspsk@isovalent.com

selftest/bpf/benchs: Fix a typo in bpf_hashmap_full_update

2023-02-16T00:29:31+00:00

To call the bpf_hashmap_full_update benchmark, one should say: bench bpf-hashmap-ful-update The patch adds a missing 'l' to the benchmark name. Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230213091519.1202813-2-aspsk@isovalent.com

selftests/bpf: Add benchmark for local_storage RCU Tasks Trace usage

2022-07-07T14:35:21+00:00

This benchmark measures grace period latency and kthread cpu usage of RCU Tasks Trace when many processes are creating/deleting BPF local_storage. Intent here is to quantify improvement on these metrics after Paul's recent RCU Tasks patches [0]. Specifically, fork 15k tasks which call a bpf prog that creates/destroys task local_storage and sleep in a loop, resulting in many call_rcu_tasks_trace calls. To determine grace period latency, trace time elapsed between rcu_tasks_trace_pregp_step and rcu_tasks_trace_postgp; for cpu usage look at rcu_task_trace_kthread's stime in /proc/PID/stat. On my virtualized test environment (Skylake, 8 cpus) benchmark results demonstrate significant improvement: BEFORE Paul's patches: SUMMARY tasks_trace grace period latency avg 22298.551 us stddev 1302.165 us SUMMARY ticks per tasks_trace grace period avg 2.291 stddev 0.324 AFTER Paul's patches: SUMMARY tasks_trace grace period latency avg 16969.197 us stddev 2525.053 us SUMMARY ticks per tasks_trace grace period avg 1.146 stddev 0.178 Note that since these patches are not in bpf-next benchmarking was done by cherry-picking this patch onto rcu tree. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/20220620225402.GA3842369@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1/ Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220705190018.3239050-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com