selftests/bpf: Clean up fmod_ret in bench_rename test script

2023-08-14T16:43:04+00:00

Running the bench_rename test script, the following error occurs: # ./benchs/run_bench_rename.sh base : 0.819 ± 0.012M/s kprobe : 0.538 ± 0.009M/s kretprobe : 0.503 ± 0.004M/s rawtp : 0.779 ± 0.020M/s fentry : 0.726 ± 0.007M/s fexit : 0.691 ± 0.007M/s benchmark 'rename-fmodret' not found The bench_rename_fmodret has been removed in commit b000def2e052 ("selftests: Remove fmod_ret from test_overhead"), thus remove it from the runners in the test script. Fixes: b000def2e052 ("selftests: Remove fmod_ret from test_overhead") Signed-off-by: Yipeng Zou Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230814030727.3010390-1-zouyipeng@huawei.com

selftest/bpf: Fmod_ret prog and implement test_overhead as part of bench

2020-05-13T19:19:38+00:00

Add fmod_ret BPF program to existing test_overhead selftest. Also re-implement user-space benchmarking part into benchmark runner to compare results. Results with ./bench are consistently somewhat lower than test_overhead's, but relative performance of various types of BPF programs stay consisten (e.g., kretprobe is noticeably slower). This slowdown seems to be coming from the fact that test_overhead is single-threaded, while benchmark always spins off at least one thread for producer. This has been confirmed by hacking multi-threaded test_overhead variant and also single-threaded bench variant. Resutls are below. run_bench_rename.sh script from benchs/ subdirectory was used to produce results for ./bench. Single-threaded implementations =============================== /* bench: single-threaded, atomics */ base : 4.622 ± 0.049M/s kprobe : 3.673 ± 0.052M/s kretprobe : 2.625 ± 0.052M/s rawtp : 4.369 ± 0.089M/s fentry : 4.201 ± 0.558M/s fexit : 4.309 ± 0.148M/s fmodret : 4.314 ± 0.203M/s /* selftest: single-threaded, no atomics */ task_rename base 4555K events per sec task_rename kprobe 3643K events per sec task_rename kretprobe 2506K events per sec task_rename raw_tp 4303K events per sec task_rename fentry 4307K events per sec task_rename fexit 4010K events per sec task_rename fmod_ret 3984K events per sec Multi-threaded implementations ============================== /* bench: multi-threaded w/ atomics */ base : 3.910 ± 0.023M/s kprobe : 3.048 ± 0.037M/s kretprobe : 2.300 ± 0.015M/s rawtp : 3.687 ± 0.034M/s fentry : 3.740 ± 0.087M/s fexit : 3.510 ± 0.009M/s fmodret : 3.485 ± 0.050M/s /* selftest: multi-threaded w/ atomics */ task_rename base 3872K events per sec task_rename kprobe 3068K events per sec task_rename kretprobe 2350K events per sec task_rename raw_tp 3731K events per sec task_rename fentry 3639K events per sec task_rename fexit 3558K events per sec task_rename fmod_ret 3511K events per sec /* selftest: multi-threaded, no atomics */ task_rename base 3945K events per sec task_rename kprobe 3298K events per sec task_rename kretprobe 2451K events per sec task_rename raw_tp 3718K events per sec task_rename fentry 3782K events per sec task_rename fexit 3543K events per sec task_rename fmod_ret 3526K events per sec Note that the fact that ./bench benchmark always uses atomic increments for counting, while test_overhead doesn't, doesn't influence test results all that much. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: John Fastabend Acked-by: Yonghong Song Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200512192445.2351848-4-andriin@fb.com

kernel/linux.git/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_rename.sh, branch master

selftests/bpf: Clean up fmod_ret in bench_rename test script

selftest/bpf: Fmod_ret prog and implement test_overhead as part of bench