<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>kernel/linux.git/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile, branch v6.4</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel stable tree (mirror)</subtitle>
<id>https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/atom?h=v6.4</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/atom?h=v6.4'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/'/>
<updated>2023-05-14T21:59:44+00:00</updated>
<entry>
<title>selftests/bpf: Fix pkg-config call building sign-file</title>
<updated>2023-05-14T21:59:44+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Jeremy Sowden</name>
<email>jeremy@azazel.net</email>
</author>
<published>2023-04-26T21:50:32+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=5f5486b620cd43b16a1787ef92b9bc21bd72ef2e'/>
<id>urn:sha1:5f5486b620cd43b16a1787ef92b9bc21bd72ef2e</id>
<content type='text'>
When building sign-file, the call to get the CFLAGS for libcrypto is
missing white-space between `pkg-config` and `--cflags`:

  $(shell $(HOSTPKG_CONFIG)--cflags libcrypto 2&gt; /dev/null)

Removing the redirection of stderr, we see:

  $ make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf sign-file
  make: Entering directory '[...]/tools/testing/selftests/bpf'
  make: pkg-config--cflags: No such file or directory
    SIGN-FILE sign-file
  make: Leaving directory '[...]/tools/testing/selftests/bpf'

Add the missing space.

Fixes: fc97590668ae ("selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() kfunc")
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Sowden &lt;jeremy@azazel.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Reviewed-by: Roberto Sassu &lt;roberto.sassu@huawei.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230426215032.415792-1-jeremy@azazel.net
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selftests/bpf: Remove stand-along test_verifier_log test binary</title>
<updated>2023-04-13T12:34:51+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Andrii Nakryiko</name>
<email>andrii@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2023-04-12T17:06:55+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=ee5059a64dbad4806a3c11babd0dbed5a5d04ead'/>
<id>urn:sha1:ee5059a64dbad4806a3c11babd0dbed5a5d04ead</id>
<content type='text'>
test_prog's prog_tests/verifier_log.c is superseding test_verifier_log
stand-alone test. It cover same checks and adds more, and is also
integrated into test_progs test runner.

Just remove test_verifier_log.c.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko &lt;andrii@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann &lt;daniel@iogearbox.net&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230412170655.1866831-1-andrii@kernel.org
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selftests: xsk: Add xskxceiver.h dependency to Makefile</title>
<updated>2023-04-05T18:18:09+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Kal Conley</name>
<email>kal.conley@dectris.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-04-03T13:01:51+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=9af87166944b3ff33d1399f7a1924ef0175e96b2'/>
<id>urn:sha1:9af87166944b3ff33d1399f7a1924ef0175e96b2</id>
<content type='text'>
xskxceiver depends on xskxceiver.h so tell make about it.

Signed-off-by: Kal Conley &lt;kal.conley@dectris.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230403130151.31195-1-kal.conley@dectris.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau &lt;martin.lau@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selftests/bpf: Add RESOLVE_BTFIDS dependency to bpf_testmod.ko</title>
<updated>2023-04-04T23:16:42+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Ilya Leoshkevich</name>
<email>iii@linux.ibm.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-04-03T17:29:35+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=8fc59c26d212c23d6fd5ad47a10651cf72d83b4a'/>
<id>urn:sha1:8fc59c26d212c23d6fd5ad47a10651cf72d83b4a</id>
<content type='text'>
bpf_testmod.ko sometimes fails to build from a clean checkout:

    BTF [M] linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.ko
    /bin/sh: 1: linux-build//tools/build/resolve_btfids/resolve_btfids: not found

The reason is that RESOLVE_BTFIDS may not yet be built. Fix by adding a
dependency.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich &lt;iii@linux.ibm.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko &lt;andrii@kernel.org&gt;
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa &lt;jolsa@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230403172935.1553022-1-iii@linux.ibm.com
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selftests/bpf: Unprivileged tests for test_loader.c</title>
<updated>2023-03-26T00:02:02+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Eduard Zingerman</name>
<email>eddyz87@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-03-25T02:54:44+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=1d56ade032a49b2042f43b3f6bdf116928064267'/>
<id>urn:sha1:1d56ade032a49b2042f43b3f6bdf116928064267</id>
<content type='text'>
Extends test_loader.c:test_loader__run_subtests() by allowing to
execute tests in unprivileged mode, similar to test_verifier.c.

Adds the following new attributes controlling test_loader behavior:

  __msg_unpriv
  __success_unpriv
  __failure_unpriv

* If any of these attributes is present the test would be loaded in
  unprivileged mode.
* If only "privileged" attributes are present the test would be loaded
  only in privileged mode.
* If both "privileged" and "unprivileged" attributes are present the
  test would be loaded in both modes.
* If test has to be executed in both modes, __msg(text) is specified
  and __msg_unpriv is not specified the behavior is the same as if
  __msg_unpriv(text) is specified.
* For test filtering purposes the name of the program loaded in
  unprivileged mode is derived from the usual program name by adding
  `@unpriv' suffix.

Also adds attribute '__description'. This attribute specifies text to
be used instead of a program name for display and filtering purposes.

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman &lt;eddyz87@gmail.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230325025524.144043-4-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selftests/bpf: Add --json-summary option to test_progs</title>
<updated>2023-03-17T23:00:33+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Manu Bretelle</name>
<email>chantr4@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-03-17T16:32:56+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=2be7aa76cc69633930fb747e1d85d33a63a60c02'/>
<id>urn:sha1:2be7aa76cc69633930fb747e1d85d33a63a60c02</id>
<content type='text'>
Currently, test_progs outputs all stdout/stderr as it runs, and when it
is done, prints a summary.

It is non-trivial for tooling to parse that output and extract meaningful
information from it.

This change adds a new option, `--json-summary`/`-J` that let the caller
specify a file where `test_progs{,-no_alu32}` can write a summary of the
run in a json format that can later be parsed by tooling.

Currently, it creates a summary section with successes/skipped/failures
followed by a list of failed tests and subtests.

A test contains the following fields:
- name: the name of the test
- number: the number of the test
- message: the log message that was printed by the test.
- failed: A boolean indicating whether the test failed or not. Currently
we only output failed tests, but in the future, successful tests could
be added.
- subtests: A list of subtests associated with this test.

A subtest contains the following fields:
- name: same as above
- number: sanme as above
- message: the log message that was printed by the subtest.
- failed: same as above but for the subtest

An example run and json content below:
```
$ sudo ./test_progs -a $(grep -v '^#' ./DENYLIST.aarch64 | awk '{print
$1","}' | tr -d '\n') -j -J /tmp/test_progs.json
$ jq &lt; /tmp/test_progs.json | head -n 30
{
  "success": 29,
  "success_subtest": 23,
  "skipped": 3,
  "failed": 28,
  "results": [
    {
      "name": "bpf_cookie",
      "number": 10,
      "message": "test_bpf_cookie:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec\n",
      "failed": true,
      "subtests": [
        {
          "name": "multi_kprobe_link_api",
          "number": 2,
          "message": "kprobe_multi_link_api_subtest:PASS:load_kallsyms 0 nsec\nlibbpf: extern 'bpf_testmod_fentry_test1' (strong): not resolved\nlibbpf: failed to load object 'kprobe_multi'\nlibbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'kprobe_multi': -3\nkprobe_multi_link_api_subtest:FAIL:fentry_raw_skel_load unexpected error: -3\n",
          "failed": true
        },
        {
          "name": "multi_kprobe_attach_api",
          "number": 3,
          "message": "libbpf: extern 'bpf_testmod_fentry_test1' (strong): not resolved\nlibbpf: failed to load object 'kprobe_multi'\nlibbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'kprobe_multi': -3\nkprobe_multi_attach_api_subtest:FAIL:fentry_raw_skel_load unexpected error: -3\n",
          "failed": true
        },
        {
          "name": "lsm",
          "number": 8,
          "message": "lsm_subtest:PASS:lsm.link_create 0 nsec\nlsm_subtest:FAIL:stack_mprotect unexpected stack_mprotect: actual 0 != expected -1\n",
          "failed": true
        }
```

The file can then be used to print a summary of the test run and list of
failing tests/subtests:

```
$ jq -r &lt; /tmp/test_progs.json '"Success: \(.success)/\(.success_subtest), Skipped: \(.skipped), Failed: \(.failed)"'

Success: 29/23, Skipped: 3, Failed: 28
$ jq -r &lt; /tmp/test_progs.json '.results | map([
    if .failed then "#\(.number) \(.name)" else empty end,
    (
        . as {name: $tname, number: $tnum} | .subtests | map(
            if .failed then "#\($tnum)/\(.number) \($tname)/\(.name)" else empty end
        )
    )
]) | flatten | .[]' | head -n 20
 #10 bpf_cookie
 #10/2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api
 #10/3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api
 #10/8 bpf_cookie/lsm
 #15 bpf_mod_race
 #15/1 bpf_mod_race/ksym (used_btfs UAF)
 #15/2 bpf_mod_race/kfunc (kfunc_btf_tab UAF)
 #36 cgroup_hierarchical_stats
 #61 deny_namespace
 #61/1 deny_namespace/unpriv_userns_create_no_bpf
 #73 fexit_stress
 #83 get_func_ip_test
 #99 kfunc_dynptr_param
 #99/1 kfunc_dynptr_param/dynptr_data_null
 #99/4 kfunc_dynptr_param/dynptr_data_null
 #100 kprobe_multi_bench_attach
 #100/1 kprobe_multi_bench_attach/kernel
 #100/2 kprobe_multi_bench_attach/modules
 #101 kprobe_multi_test
 #101/1 kprobe_multi_test/skel_api
```

Signed-off-by: Manu Bretelle &lt;chantr4@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko &lt;andrii@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230317163256.3809328-1-chantr4@gmail.com
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selftests/bpf: Add local-storage-create benchmark</title>
<updated>2023-03-10T19:06:02+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Martin KaFai Lau</name>
<email>martin.lau@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2023-03-08T06:59:36+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=4659fba121dac21a3516986a3c2cf8459c7ac3bc'/>
<id>urn:sha1:4659fba121dac21a3516986a3c2cf8459c7ac3bc</id>
<content type='text'>
This patch tests how many kmallocs is needed to create and free
a batch of UDP sockets and each socket has a 64bytes bpf storage.
It also measures how fast the UDP sockets can be created.

The result is from my qemu setup.

Before bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free:
./bench -p 1 local-storage-create
Setting up benchmark 'local-storage-create'...
Benchmark 'local-storage-create' started.
Iter   0 ( 73.193us): creates  213.552k/s (213.552k/prod), 3.09 kmallocs/create
Iter   1 (-20.724us): creates  211.908k/s (211.908k/prod), 3.09 kmallocs/create
Iter   2 (  9.280us): creates  212.574k/s (212.574k/prod), 3.12 kmallocs/create
Iter   3 ( 11.039us): creates  213.209k/s (213.209k/prod), 3.12 kmallocs/create
Iter   4 (-11.411us): creates  213.351k/s (213.351k/prod), 3.12 kmallocs/create
Iter   5 ( -7.915us): creates  214.754k/s (214.754k/prod), 3.12 kmallocs/create
Iter   6 ( 11.317us): creates  210.942k/s (210.942k/prod), 3.12 kmallocs/create
Summary: creates  212.789 ± 1.310k/s (212.789k/prod), 3.12 kmallocs/create

After bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free:
./bench -p 1 local-storage-create
Setting up benchmark 'local-storage-create'...
Benchmark 'local-storage-create' started.
Iter   0 ( 68.265us): creates  243.984k/s (243.984k/prod), 1.04 kmallocs/create
Iter   1 ( 30.357us): creates  238.424k/s (238.424k/prod), 1.04 kmallocs/create
Iter   2 (-18.712us): creates  232.963k/s (232.963k/prod), 1.04 kmallocs/create
Iter   3 (-15.885us): creates  238.879k/s (238.879k/prod), 1.04 kmallocs/create
Iter   4 (  5.590us): creates  237.490k/s (237.490k/prod), 1.04 kmallocs/create
Iter   5 (  8.577us): creates  237.521k/s (237.521k/prod), 1.04 kmallocs/create
Iter   6 ( -6.263us): creates  238.508k/s (238.508k/prod), 1.04 kmallocs/create
Summary: creates  237.298 ± 2.198k/s (237.298k/prod), 1.04 kmallocs/create

Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau &lt;martin.lau@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308065936.1550103-18-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selftests/bpf: make BPF compiler flags stricter</title>
<updated>2023-03-10T16:14:08+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Andrii Nakryiko</name>
<email>andrii@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2023-03-09T05:40:15+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=3d5a55ddc25508fe950991603d0224c0bba60558'/>
<id>urn:sha1:3d5a55ddc25508fe950991603d0224c0bba60558</id>
<content type='text'>
We recently added -Wuninitialized, but it's not enough to catch various
silly mistakes or omissions. Let's go all the way to -Wall, just like we
do for user-space code.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko &lt;andrii@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230309054015.4068562-5-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selftests/bpf: Disassembler tests for verifier.c:convert_ctx_access()</title>
<updated>2023-03-04T05:41:46+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Eduard Zingerman</name>
<email>eddyz87@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-03-04T01:12:47+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=71cf4d027ad53a1e2847191ac14e50132d35a6a7'/>
<id>urn:sha1:71cf4d027ad53a1e2847191ac14e50132d35a6a7</id>
<content type='text'>
Function verifier.c:convert_ctx_access() applies some rewrites to BPF
instructions that read or write BPF program context. This commit adds
machinery to allow test cases that inspect BPF program after these
rewrites are applied.

An example of a test case:

  {
        // Shorthand for field offset and size specification
	N(CGROUP_SOCKOPT, struct bpf_sockopt, retval),

        // Pattern generated for field read
	.read  = "$dst = *(u64 *)($ctx + bpf_sockopt_kern::current_task);"
		 "$dst = *(u64 *)($dst + task_struct::bpf_ctx);"
		 "$dst = *(u32 *)($dst + bpf_cg_run_ctx::retval);",

        // Pattern generated for field write
	.write = "*(u64 *)($ctx + bpf_sockopt_kern::tmp_reg) = r9;"
		 "r9 = *(u64 *)($ctx + bpf_sockopt_kern::current_task);"
		 "r9 = *(u64 *)(r9 + task_struct::bpf_ctx);"
		 "*(u32 *)(r9 + bpf_cg_run_ctx::retval) = $src;"
		 "r9 = *(u64 *)($ctx + bpf_sockopt_kern::tmp_reg);" ,
  },

For each test case, up to three programs are created:
- One that uses BPF_LDX_MEM to read the context field.
- One that uses BPF_STX_MEM to write to the context field.
- One that uses BPF_ST_MEM to write to the context field.

The disassembly of each program is compared with the pattern specified
in the test case.

Kernel code for disassembly is reused (as is in the bpftool).
To keep Makefile changes to the minimum, symbolic links to
`kernel/bpf/disasm.c` and `kernel/bpf/disasm.h ` are added.

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman &lt;eddyz87@gmail.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304011247.566040-4-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>selftests/bpf: Add -Wuninitialized flag to bpf prog flags</title>
<updated>2023-03-03T06:38:50+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Dave Marchevsky</name>
<email>davemarchevsky@fb.com</email>
</author>
<published>2023-03-03T00:55:00+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/commit/?id=ec97a76f113ee0d8fd17178b4e4ffbf0ab9e5452'/>
<id>urn:sha1:ec97a76f113ee0d8fd17178b4e4ffbf0ab9e5452</id>
<content type='text'>
Per C99 standard [0], Section 6.7.8, Paragraph 10:

  If an object that has automatic storage duration is not initialized
  explicitly, its value is indeterminate.

And in the same document, in appendix "J.2 Undefined behavior":

  The behavior is undefined in the following circumstances:
  [...]
  The value of an object with automatic storage duration is used while
  it is indeterminate (6.2.4, 6.7.8, 6.8).

This means that use of an uninitialized stack variable is undefined
behavior, and therefore that clang can choose to do a variety of scary
things, such as not generating bytecode for "bunch of useful code" in
the below example:

  void some_func()
  {
    int i;
    if (!i)
      return;
    // bunch of useful code
  }

To add insult to injury, if some_func above is a helper function for
some BPF program, clang can choose to not generate an "exit" insn,
causing verifier to fail with "last insn is not an exit or jmp". Going
from that verification failure to the root cause of uninitialized use
is certain to be frustrating.

This patch adds -Wuninitialized to the cflags for selftest BPF progs and
fixes up existing instances of uninitialized use.

  [0]: https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/WG14/www/docs/n1256.pdf

Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky &lt;davemarchevsky@fb.com&gt;
Cc: David Vernet &lt;void@manifault.com&gt;
Cc: Tejun Heo &lt;tj@kernel.org&gt;
Acked-by: David Vernet &lt;void@manifault.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303005500.1614874-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov &lt;ast@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
