kernel/linux.git/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include, branch v6.6.131

perf parse-regs: Remove unused macros PERF_REG_{IP|SP}

2023-08-16T11:48:06+00:00

The macros PERF_REG_{IP|SP} have been replaced by using functions perf_arch_reg_{ip|sp}(), remove them! Signed-off-by: Leo Yan Acked-by: Ian Rogers Cc: Adrian Hunter Cc: Albert Ou Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Eric Lin Cc: Fangrui Song Cc: Guo Ren Cc: Huacai Chen Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Ivan Babrou Cc: James Clark Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: John Garry Cc: Kan Liang Cc: Mark Rutland Cc: Mike Leach Cc: Ming Wang Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: Paul Walmsley Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Sandipan Das Cc: Will Deacon Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-csky@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230606014559.21783-5-leo.yan@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf arch: Support register names from all archs

2021-12-16T15:18:12+00:00

When reading a perf.data file with register values, there is a mismatch between the names and the values of the registers because the tool is built using only the register names from the local architecture. Reading a perf.data file that was recorded on ARM64, gives the following erroneous output on an X86 machine: # perf report -i perf_arm64.data -D [...] 24661932634451 0x698 [0x21d0]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x1): 43239/43239: 0xffffc5be8f100f98 period: 1 addr: 0 ... user regs: mask 0x1ffffffff ABI 64-bit .... AX 0x0000ffffd1515817 .... BX 0x0000ffffd1515480 .... CX 0x0000aaaadabf6c80 .... DX 0x000000000000002e .... SI 0x0000000040100401 .... DI 0x0040600200000080 .... BP 0x0000ffffd1510e10 .... SP 0x0000000000000000 .... IP 0x00000000000000dd .... FLAGS 0x0000ffffd1510cd0 .... CS 0x0000000000000000 .... SS 0x0000000000000030 .... DS 0x0000ffffa569a208 .... ES 0x0000000000000000 .... FS 0x0000000000000000 .... GS 0x0000000000000000 .... R8 0x0000aaaad3de9650 .... R9 0x0000ffffa57397f0 .... R10 0x0000000000000001 .... R11 0x0000ffffa57fd000 .... R12 0x0000ffffd1515817 .... R13 0x0000ffffd1515480 .... R14 0x0000aaaadabf6c80 .... R15 0x0000000000000000 .... unknown 0x0000000000000001 .... unknown 0x0000000000000000 .... unknown 0x0000000000000000 .... unknown 0x0000000000000000 .... unknown 0x0000000000000000 .... unknown 0x0000ffffd1510d90 .... unknown 0x0000ffffa5739b90 .... unknown 0x0000ffffd1510d80 .... XMM0 0x0000ffffa57392c8 ... thread: perf-exec:43239 ...... dso: [kernel.kallsyms] As can be seen, the register names correspond to X86 registers, even though the perf.data file was recorded on an ARM64 system. After this patch, the output of the command displays the correct register names: # perf report -i perf_arm64.data -D [...] 24661932634451 0x698 [0x21d0]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x1): 43239/43239: 0xffffc5be8f100f98 period: 1 addr: 0 ... user regs: mask 0x1ffffffff ABI 64-bit .... x0 0x0000ffffd1515817 .... x1 0x0000ffffd1515480 .... x2 0x0000aaaadabf6c80 .... x3 0x000000000000002e .... x4 0x0000000040100401 .... x5 0x0040600200000080 .... x6 0x0000ffffd1510e10 .... x7 0x0000000000000000 .... x8 0x00000000000000dd .... x9 0x0000ffffd1510cd0 .... x10 0x0000000000000000 .... x11 0x0000000000000030 .... x12 0x0000ffffa569a208 .... x13 0x0000000000000000 .... x14 0x0000000000000000 .... x15 0x0000000000000000 .... x16 0x0000aaaad3de9650 .... x17 0x0000ffffa57397f0 .... x18 0x0000000000000001 .... x19 0x0000ffffa57fd000 .... x20 0x0000ffffd1515817 .... x21 0x0000ffffd1515480 .... x22 0x0000aaaadabf6c80 .... x23 0x0000000000000000 .... x24 0x0000000000000001 .... x25 0x0000000000000000 .... x26 0x0000000000000000 .... x27 0x0000000000000000 .... x28 0x0000000000000000 .... x29 0x0000ffffd1510d90 .... lr 0x0000ffffa5739b90 .... sp 0x0000ffffd1510d80 .... pc 0x0000ffffa57392c8 ... thread: perf-exec:43239 ...... dso: [kernel.kallsyms] Tester comments: Athira reports: "Looks good to me. Tested this patchset in powerpc by capturing regs in powerpc and doing perf report to read the data from x86." Reported-by: Alexandre Truong Reviewed-by: Athira Jajeev Signed-off-by: German Gomez Tested-by: Athira Jajeev Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: John Garry Cc: Leo Yan Cc: Mark Rutland Cc: Mathieu Poirier Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Will Deacon Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-csky@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207180653.1147374-4-german.gomez@arm.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf test: Rename struct test to test_suite

2021-11-13T13:32:22+00:00

This is to align with kunit's terminology. Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers Tested-by: Sohaib Mohamed Acked-by: Jiri Olsa Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Brendan Higgins Cc: Daniel Latypov Cc: David Gow Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Jin Yao Cc: John Garry Cc: Mark Rutland Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Paul Clarke Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephane Eranian Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211104064208.3156807-6-irogers@google.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf test: Make each test/suite its own struct.

2021-11-13T13:30:04+00:00

By switching to an array of pointers to tests (later to be suites) the definition of the tests can be moved to the file containing the tests. Committer notes: It's "&vectors_page", not "&vectors_pages", noticed when cross building to 32-bit ARM. Also the DEFINE_SUITE(vectors_page) should be done where its function is implemented, in tools/perf/arch/arm/tests/vectors-page.c, so that we can make it static, as we don't have anymore its declaration in tests.h. Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers Tested-by: Sohaib Mohamed Acked-by: Jiri Olsa Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Brendan Higgins Cc: Daniel Latypov Cc: David Gow Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Jin Yao Cc: John Garry Cc: Mark Rutland Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Paul Clarke Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephane Eranian Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211104064208.3156807-4-irogers@google.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf powerpc: Add support to expose instruction and data address registers as part of extended regs

2021-10-25T16:47:42+00:00

This patch enables presenting Sampled Instruction Address Register (SIAR) and Sampled Data Address Register (SDAR) SPRs as part of extended registers for the perf tool. Add these SPR's to sample_reg_mask in the tool side (to use with -I? option). Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain Signed-off-by: Athira Jajeev Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Nageswara R Sastry Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211018114948.16830-3-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf tests: Consolidate test__arch_unwind_sample declaration

2021-05-21T19:57:43+00:00

There's no reason for making the test__arch_unwind_sample declaration per arch. Currently that's done 2 different ways either with a declaration in arch-tests.h or with an arch define. Unify all this with an unconditional declaration in tests.h. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring Acked-by: Jiri Olsa Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: John Garry Cc: Leo Yan Cc: Mark Rutland Cc: Mathieu Poirier Cc: Matt Fleming Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Will Deacon Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: masayoshi mizuma Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210513174614.2242210-1-robh@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf tools: Fix arm64 build error with gcc-11

2021-02-18T19:24:43+00:00

gcc version: 11.0.0 20210208 (experimental) (GCC) Following build error on arm64: ....... In function ‘printf’, inlined from ‘regs_dump__printf’ at util/session.c:1141:3, inlined from ‘regs__printf’ at util/session.c:1169:2: /usr/include/aarch64-linux-gnu/bits/stdio2.h:107:10: \ error: ‘%-5s’ directive argument is null [-Werror=format-overflow=] 107 | return __printf_chk (__USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1, __fmt, \ __va_arg_pack ()); ...... In function ‘fprintf’, inlined from ‘perf_sample__fprintf_regs.isra’ at \ builtin-script.c:622:14: /usr/include/aarch64-linux-gnu/bits/stdio2.h:100:10: \ error: ‘%5s’ directive argument is null [-Werror=format-overflow=] 100 | return __fprintf_chk (__stream, __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1, __fmt, 101 | __va_arg_pack ()); cc1: all warnings being treated as errors ....... This patch fixes Wformat-overflow warnings. Add helper function to convert NULL to "unknown". Signed-off-by: Jianlin Lv Reviewed-by: John Garry Acked-by: Jiri Olsa Cc: Albert Ou Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Anju T Sudhakar Cc: Athira Jajeev Cc: Guo Ren Cc: Kajol Jain Cc: Leo Yan Cc: Mark Rutland Cc: Mathieu Poirier Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Paul Walmsley Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ravi Bangoria Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: iecedge@gmail.com Cc: linux-csky@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210218031245.2078492-1-Jianlin.Lv@arm.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf powerpc: Support exposing Performance Monitor Counter SPRs as part of extended regs

2021-02-08T19:25:00+00:00

To enable presenting of Performance Monitor Counter Registers (PMC1 to PMC6) as part of extended regsiters, this patch adds these to sample_reg_mask in the tool side (to use with -I? option). Simplified the PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300/31 definition. Excluded the unsupported SPRs (MMCR3, SIER2, SIER3) from extended mask value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300. Signed-off-by: Athira Jajeev Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Kajol Jain Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf tools powerpc: Add support for extended regs in power10

2020-08-07T12:27:03+00:00

Added support for supported regs which are new in power10 ( MMCR3, SIER2, SIER3 ) to sample_reg_mask in the tool side to use with `-I?` option. Also added PVR check to send extended mask for power10 at kernel while capturing extended regs in each sample. Signed-off-by: Athira Jajeev Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain Reviewed-by: Ravi Bangoria Tested-by: Ravi Bangoria Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Michael Neuling Cc: Ravi Bangoria Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf tools powerpc: Add support for extended register capability

2020-08-07T12:27:03+00:00

Add extended regs to sample_reg_mask in the tool side to use with `-I?` option. Perf tools side uses extended mask to display the platform supported register names (with -I? option) to the user and also send this mask to the kernel to capture the extended registers in each sample. Hence decide the mask value based on the processor version. Currently definitions for `mfspr`, `SPRN_PVR` are part of `arch/powerpc/util/header.c`. Move this to a header file so that these definitions can be re-used in other source files as well. Signed-off-by: Anju T Sudhakar Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan Reviewed--by: Ravi Bangoria Tested-by: Ravi Bangoria Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Michael Neuling Cc: Ravi Bangoria Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org [Decide extended mask at run time based on platform] Signed-off-by: Athira Jajeev Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo