kernel/linux.git/tools/build/feature, branch v5.19

perf build: Stop using __weak bpf_map_create() to handle older libbpf versions

2022-05-26T15:36:56+00:00

By adding a feature test for bpf_map_create() and providing a fallback if it isn't present in older versions of libbpf. This also fixes the build with torvalds/master at this point: $ git log --oneline -5 torvalds/master babf0bb978e3c9fc (torvalds/master) Merge tag 'xfs-5.19-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-linux e375780b631a5fc2 Merge tag 'fsnotify_for_v5.19-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs 8b728edc5be16179 Merge tag 'fs_for_v5.19-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs 3f306ea2e18568f6 Merge tag 'dma-mapping-5.19-2022-05-25' of git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/dma-mapping fbe86daca0ba878b Merge tag 'scsi-misc' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi $ Coping with: $ git log --oneline -2 d16495a982324f75 d16495a982324f75 libbpf: remove bpf_create_map*() APIs e2371b1632b1c61c libbpf: start 1.0 development cycle $ As the __weak function fails to build as it calls the now removed bpf_create_map() API. Testing: $ rpm -q libbpf-devel libbpf-devel-0.4.0-2.fc35.x86_64 $ $ make -C tools/perf BUILD_BPF_SKEL=1 LIBBPF_DYNAMIC=1 O=/tmp/build/perf install-bin $ cat /tmp/build/perf/feature/test-libbpf-bpf_map_create.make.output test-libbpf-bpf_map_create.c: In function ‘main’: test-libbpf-bpf_map_create.c:6:16: error: implicit declaration of function ‘bpf_map_create’; did you mean ‘bpf_map_freeze’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 6 | return bpf_map_create(0 /* map_type */, NULL /* map_name */, 0, /* key_size */, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | bpf_map_freeze test-libbpf-bpf_map_create.c:6:87: error: expected expression before ‘,’ token 6 | return bpf_map_create(0 /* map_type */, NULL /* map_name */, 0, /* key_size */, | ^ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors $ $ objdump -dS /tmp/build/perf/perf | grep ':' -A20 000000000058b290 : { 58b290: 55 push %rbp 58b291: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp 58b294: 48 83 ec 10 sub $0x10,%rsp 58b298: 64 48 8b 04 25 28 00 mov %fs:0x28,%rax 58b29f: 00 00 58b2a1: 48 89 45 f8 mov %rax,-0x8(%rbp) 58b2a5: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax return bpf_create_map(map_type, key_size, value_size, max_entries, 0); 58b2a7: 48 8b 45 f8 mov -0x8(%rbp),%rax 58b2ab: 64 48 2b 04 25 28 00 sub %fs:0x28,%rax 58b2b2: 00 00 58b2b4: 75 10 jne 58b2c6 } 58b2b6: c9 leave 58b2b7: 89 d6 mov %edx,%esi 58b2b9: 89 ca mov %ecx,%edx 58b2bb: 44 89 c1 mov %r8d,%ecx return bpf_create_map(map_type, key_size, value_size, max_entries, 0); 58b2be: 45 31 c0 xor %r8d,%r8d $ Cc: Andrii Nakryiko Cc: Heiko Carstens Cc: Ian Rogers Cc: Ilya Leoshkevich Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Song Liu Cc: Sumanth Korikkar Cc: Sven Schnelle Cc: Thomas Richter Cc: Vasily Gorbik Link: http://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/Yo+XvQNKL4K5khl2@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf build: Stop using weak btfraw_data() to handle older libbpf versions

2022-05-26T14:02:02+00:00

By adding a feature test for btf__raw_data() and providing a fallback if it isn't present in older versions of libbpf. Committer testing: $ rpm -q libbpf-devel libbpf-devel-0.4.0-2.fc35.x86_64 $ make -C tools/perf LIBBPF_DYNAMIC=1 O=/tmp/build/perf install-bin $ cat /tmp/build/perf/feature/test-libbpf-btf__raw_data.make.output test-libbpf-btf__raw_data.c: In function ‘main’: test-libbpf-btf__raw_data.c:6:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘btf__raw_data’; did you mean ‘btf__get_raw_data’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 6 | btf__raw_data(NULL /* btf_ro */, NULL /* size */); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ | btf__get_raw_data cc1: all warnings being treated as errors $ objdump -dS /tmp/build/perf/perf | grep ':' -A20 00000000005b3050 : { 5b3050: 55 push %rbp 5b3051: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp 5b3054: 48 83 ec 10 sub $0x10,%rsp 5b3058: 64 48 8b 04 25 28 00 mov %fs:0x28,%rax 5b305f: 00 00 5b3061: 48 89 45 f8 mov %rax,-0x8(%rbp) 5b3065: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax return btf__get_raw_data(btf_ro, size); 5b3067: 48 8b 45 f8 mov -0x8(%rbp),%rax 5b306b: 64 48 2b 04 25 28 00 sub %fs:0x28,%rax 5b3072: 00 00 5b3074: 75 06 jne 5b307c } 5b3076: c9 leave return btf__get_raw_data(btf_ro, size); 5b3077: e9 14 99 e5 ff jmp 40c990 5b307c: e8 af a7 e5 ff call 40d830 <__stack_chk_fail@plt> 5b3081: 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 data16 cs nopw 0x0(%rax,%rax,1) 5b3088: 00 00 00 00 $ Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Heiko Carstens Cc: Ian Rogers Cc: Ilya Leoshkevich Cc: Sumanth Korikkar Cc: Sven Schnelle Cc: Thomas Richter Cc: Vasily Gorbik Link: http://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/YozLKby7ITEtchC9@krava Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf build: Stop using __weak bpf_object__next_map() to handle older libbpf versions

2022-05-26T14:02:02+00:00

By adding a feature test for bpf_object__next_map() and providing a fallback if it isn't present in older versions of libbpf. Committer testing: $ rpm -q libbpf-devel libbpf-devel-0.4.0-2.fc35.x86_64 $ make -C tools/perf LIBBPF_DYNAMIC=1 O=/tmp/build/perf install-bin $ cat /tmp/build/perf/feature/test-libbpf-bpf_object__next_map.make.output test-libbpf-bpf_object__next_map.c: In function ‘main’: test-libbpf-bpf_object__next_map.c:6:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘bpf_object__next_map’; did you mean ‘bpf_object__next’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 6 | bpf_object__next_map(NULL /* obj */, NULL /* prev */); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | bpf_object__next cc1: all warnings being treated as errors $ $ objdump -dS /tmp/build/perf/perf | grep ':' -A20 00000000005b2e00 : { 5b2e00: 55 push %rbp 5b2e01: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp 5b2e04: 48 83 ec 10 sub $0x10,%rsp 5b2e08: 64 48 8b 04 25 28 00 mov %fs:0x28,%rax 5b2e0f: 00 00 5b2e11: 48 89 45 f8 mov %rax,-0x8(%rbp) 5b2e15: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax return bpf_map__next(prev, obj); 5b2e17: 48 8b 45 f8 mov -0x8(%rbp),%rax 5b2e1b: 64 48 2b 04 25 28 00 sub %fs:0x28,%rax 5b2e22: 00 00 5b2e24: 75 0f jne 5b2e35 } 5b2e26: c9 leave 5b2e27: 49 89 f8 mov %rdi,%r8 5b2e2a: 48 89 f7 mov %rsi,%rdi return bpf_map__next(prev, obj); 5b2e2d: 4c 89 c6 mov %r8,%rsi 5b2e30: e9 cb b1 e5 ff jmp 40e000 $ Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Heiko Carstens Cc: Ian Rogers Cc: Ilya Leoshkevich Cc: Sumanth Korikkar Cc: Sven Schnelle Cc: Thomas Richter Cc: Vasily Gorbik Link: http://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/YozLKby7ITEtchC9@krava Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf build: Stop using __weak bpf_object__next_program() to handle older libbpf versions

2022-05-26T14:02:02+00:00

By adding a feature test for bpf_object__next_program() and providing a fallback if it isn't present in older versions of libbpf. Committer testing: $ rpm -q libbpf-devel libbpf-devel-0.4.0-2.fc35.x86_64 $ make -C tools/perf LIBBPF_DYNAMIC=1 O=/tmp/build/perf install-bin $ cat /tmp/build/perf/feature/test-libbpf-bpf_object__next_program.make.output test-libbpf-bpf_object__next_program.c: In function ‘main’: test-libbpf-bpf_object__next_program.c:6:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘bpf_object__next_program’; did you mean ‘bpf_object__unpin_programs’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 6 | bpf_object__next_program(NULL /* obj */, NULL /* prev */); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | bpf_object__unpin_programs cc1: all warnings being treated as errors $ $ objdump -dS /tmp/build/perf/perf | grep ':' -A20 00000000005b2dc0 : { 5b2dc0: 55 push %rbp 5b2dc1: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp 5b2dc4: 48 83 ec 10 sub $0x10,%rsp 5b2dc8: 64 48 8b 04 25 28 00 mov %fs:0x28,%rax 5b2dcf: 00 00 5b2dd1: 48 89 45 f8 mov %rax,-0x8(%rbp) 5b2dd5: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax return bpf_program__next(prev, obj); 5b2dd7: 48 8b 45 f8 mov -0x8(%rbp),%rax 5b2ddb: 64 48 2b 04 25 28 00 sub %fs:0x28,%rax 5b2de2: 00 00 5b2de4: 75 0f jne 5b2df5 } 5b2de6: c9 leave 5b2de7: 49 89 f8 mov %rdi,%r8 5b2dea: 48 89 f7 mov %rsi,%rdi return bpf_program__next(prev, obj); 5b2ded: 4c 89 c6 mov %r8,%rsi 5b2df0: e9 3b b4 e5 ff jmp 40e230 $ Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Heiko Carstens Cc: Ian Rogers Cc: Ilya Leoshkevich Cc: Sumanth Korikkar Cc: Sven Schnelle Cc: Thomas Richter Cc: Vasily Gorbik Link: http://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/YozLKby7ITEtchC9@krava Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf build: Stop using __weak bpf_prog_load() to handle older libbpf versions

2022-05-26T14:02:02+00:00

By adding a feature test for bpf_prog_load() and providing a fallback if it isn't present in older versions of libbpf. Committer testing: $ rpm -q libbpf-devel libbpf-devel-0.4.0-2.fc35.x86_64 $ make -C tools/perf LIBBPF_DYNAMIC=1 O=/tmp/build/perf install-bin $ cat /tmp/build/perf/feature/test-libbpf-bpf_prog_load.make.output test-libbpf-bpf_prog_load.c: In function ‘main’: test-libbpf-bpf_prog_load.c:6:16: error: implicit declaration of function ‘bpf_prog_load’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 6 | return bpf_prog_load(0 /* prog_type */, NULL /* prog_name */, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors $ $ objdump -dS /tmp/build/perf/perf | grep ':' -A20 00000000005b2d70 : { 5b2d70: 55 push %rbp 5b2d71: 48 89 ce mov %rcx,%rsi 5b2d74: 4c 89 c8 mov %r9,%rax 5b2d77: 49 89 d2 mov %rdx,%r10 5b2d7a: 4c 89 c2 mov %r8,%rdx 5b2d7d: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp 5b2d80: 48 83 ec 18 sub $0x18,%rsp 5b2d84: 64 48 8b 0c 25 28 00 mov %fs:0x28,%rcx 5b2d8b: 00 00 5b2d8d: 48 89 4d f8 mov %rcx,-0x8(%rbp) 5b2d91: 31 c9 xor %ecx,%ecx return bpf_load_program(prog_type, insns, insn_cnt, license, 5b2d93: 41 8b 49 5c mov 0x5c(%r9),%ecx 5b2d97: 51 push %rcx 5b2d98: 4d 8b 49 60 mov 0x60(%r9),%r9 5b2d9c: 4c 89 d1 mov %r10,%rcx 5b2d9f: 44 8b 40 1c mov 0x1c(%rax),%r8d 5b2da3: e8 f8 aa e5 ff call 40d8a0 } $ Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Heiko Carstens Cc: Ian Rogers Cc: Ilya Leoshkevich Cc: Sumanth Korikkar Cc: Sven Schnelle Cc: Thomas Richter Cc: Vasily Gorbik Link: http://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/YozLKby7ITEtchC9@krava Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf build: Fix btf__load_from_kernel_by_id() feature check

2022-05-26T14:02:02+00:00

The btf__load_from_kernel_by_id() only takes one arg, not two. Committer notes: I tested it just with an older libbpf, one where btf__load_from_kernel_by_id() wasn't introduced yet. A test with a newer dynamic libbpf would fail because the btf__load_from_kernel_by_id() is there, but takes just one arg. Fixes: 0ae065a5d265bc5a ("perf build: Fix check for btf__load_from_kernel_by_id() in libbpf") Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Cc: Heiko Carstens Cc: Ian Rogers Cc: Ilya Leoshkevich Cc: Sumanth Korikkar Cc: Sven Schnelle Cc: Thomas Richter Cc: Vasily Gorbik Link: http://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/YozLKby7ITEtchC9@krava Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf build: Fix check for btf__load_from_kernel_by_id() in libbpf

2022-05-20T12:45:41+00:00

Avi Kivity reported a problem where the __weak btf__load_from_kernel_by_id() in tools/perf/util/bpf-event.c was being used and it called btf__get_from_id() in tools/lib/bpf/btf.c that in turn called back to btf__load_from_kernel_by_id(), resulting in an endless loop. Fix this by adding a feature test to check if btf__load_from_kernel_by_id() is available when building perf with LIBBPF_DYNAMIC=1, and if not then provide the fallback to the old btf__get_from_id(), that doesn't call back to btf__load_from_kernel_by_id() since at that time it didn't exist at all. Tested on Fedora 35 where we have libbpf-devel 0.4.0 with LIBBPF_DYNAMIC where we don't have btf__load_from_kernel_by_id() and thus its feature test fail, not defining HAVE_LIBBPF_BTF__LOAD_FROM_KERNEL_BY_ID: $ cat /tmp/build/perf-urgent/feature/test-libbpf-btf__load_from_kernel_by_id.make.output test-libbpf-btf__load_from_kernel_by_id.c: In function ‘main’: test-libbpf-btf__load_from_kernel_by_id.c:6:16: error: implicit declaration of function ‘btf__load_from_kernel_by_id’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 6 | return btf__load_from_kernel_by_id(20151128, NULL); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors $ $ nm /tmp/build/perf-urgent/perf | grep btf__load_from_kernel_by_id 00000000005ba180 T btf__load_from_kernel_by_id $ $ objdump --disassemble=btf__load_from_kernel_by_id -S /tmp/build/perf-urgent/perf /tmp/build/perf-urgent/perf: file format elf64-x86-64 00000000005ba180 : #include "record.h" #include "util/synthetic-events.h" #ifndef HAVE_LIBBPF_BTF__LOAD_FROM_KERNEL_BY_ID struct btf *btf__load_from_kernel_by_id(__u32 id) { 5ba180: 55 push %rbp 5ba181: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp 5ba184: 48 83 ec 10 sub $0x10,%rsp 5ba188: 64 48 8b 04 25 28 00 mov %fs:0x28,%rax 5ba18f: 00 00 5ba191: 48 89 45 f8 mov %rax,-0x8(%rbp) 5ba195: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax struct btf *btf; #pragma GCC diagnostic push #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdeprecated-declarations" int err = btf__get_from_id(id, &btf); 5ba197: 48 8d 75 f0 lea -0x10(%rbp),%rsi 5ba19b: e8 a0 57 e5 ff call 40f940 5ba1a0: 89 c2 mov %eax,%edx #pragma GCC diagnostic pop return err ? ERR_PTR(err) : btf; 5ba1a2: 48 98 cltq 5ba1a4: 85 d2 test %edx,%edx 5ba1a6: 48 0f 44 45 f0 cmove -0x10(%rbp),%rax } Fixes: 218e7b775d368f38 ("perf bpf: Provide a weak btf__load_from_kernel_by_id() for older libbpf versions") Reported-by: Avi Kivity Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/f0add43b-3de5-20c5-22c4-70aff4af959f@scylladb.com Cc: Adrian Hunter Cc: Ian Rogers Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Namhyung Kim Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/YobjjFOblY4Xvwo7@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

tools build: Filter out options and warnings not supported by clang

2022-04-09T15:34:16+00:00

These make the feature check fail when using clang, so remove them just like is done in tools/perf/Makefile.config to build perf itself. Adding -Wno-compound-token-split-by-macro to tools/perf/Makefile.config when building with clang is also necessary to avoid these warnings turned into errors (-Werror): CC /tmp/build/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-perl.o In file included from util/scripting-engines/trace-event-perl.c:35: In file included from /usr/lib64/perl5/CORE/perl.h:4085: In file included from /usr/lib64/perl5/CORE/hv.h:659: In file included from /usr/lib64/perl5/CORE/hv_func.h:34: In file included from /usr/lib64/perl5/CORE/sbox32_hash.h:4: /usr/lib64/perl5/CORE/zaphod32_hash.h:150:5: error: '(' and '{' tokens introducing statement expression appear in different macro expansion contexts [-Werror,-Wcompound-token-split-by-macro] ZAPHOD32_SCRAMBLE32(state[0],0x9fade23b); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/lib64/perl5/CORE/zaphod32_hash.h:80:38: note: expanded from macro 'ZAPHOD32_SCRAMBLE32' #define ZAPHOD32_SCRAMBLE32(v,prime) STMT_START { \ ^~~~~~~~~~ /usr/lib64/perl5/CORE/perl.h:737:29: note: expanded from macro 'STMT_START' # define STMT_START (void)( /* gcc supports "({ STATEMENTS; })" */ ^ /usr/lib64/perl5/CORE/zaphod32_hash.h:150:5: note: '{' token is here ZAPHOD32_SCRAMBLE32(state[0],0x9fade23b); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/lib64/perl5/CORE/zaphod32_hash.h:80:49: note: expanded from macro 'ZAPHOD32_SCRAMBLE32' #define ZAPHOD32_SCRAMBLE32(v,prime) STMT_START { \ ^ /usr/lib64/perl5/CORE/zaphod32_hash.h:150:5: error: '}' and ')' tokens terminating statement expression appear in different macro expansion contexts [-Werror,-Wcompound-token-split-by-macro] ZAPHOD32_SCRAMBLE32(state[0],0x9fade23b); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/lib64/perl5/CORE/zaphod32_hash.h:87:41: note: expanded from macro 'ZAPHOD32_SCRAMBLE32' v ^= (v>>23); \ ^ /usr/lib64/perl5/CORE/zaphod32_hash.h:150:5: note: ')' token is here ZAPHOD32_SCRAMBLE32(state[0],0x9fade23b); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/lib64/perl5/CORE/zaphod32_hash.h:88:3: note: expanded from macro 'ZAPHOD32_SCRAMBLE32' } STMT_END ^~~~~~~~ /usr/lib64/perl5/CORE/perl.h:738:21: note: expanded from macro 'STMT_END' # define STMT_END ) ^ Please refer to the discussion on the Link: tag below, where Nathan clarifies the situation: acme> And then get to the problems at the end of this message, which seem acme> similar to the problem described here: acme> acme> From Nathan Chancellor <> acme> Subject [PATCH] mwifiex: Remove unnecessary braces from HostCmd_SET_SEQ_NO_BSS_INFO acme> acme> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/9/1/135 acme> acme> So perhaps in this case its better to disable that acme> -Werror,-Wcompound-token-split-by-macro when building with clang? Yes, I think that is probably the best solution. As far as I can tell, at least in this file and context, the warning appears harmless, as the "create a GNU C statement expression from two different macros" is very much intentional, based on the presence of PERL_USE_GCC_BRACE_GROUPS. The warning is fixed in upstream Perl by just avoiding creating GNU C statement expressions using STMT_START and STMT_END: https://github.com/Perl/perl5/issues/18780 https://github.com/Perl/perl5/pull/18984 If I am reading the source code correctly, an alternative to disabling the warning would be specifying -DPERL_GCC_BRACE_GROUPS_FORBIDDEN but it seems like that might end up impacting more than just this site, according to the issue discussion above. Based-on-a-patch-by: Sedat Dilek Tested-by: Sedat Dilek # Debian/Selfmade LLVM-14 (x86-64) Cc: Adrian Hunter Cc: Fangrui Song Cc: Florian Fainelli Cc: Ian Rogers Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: John Keeping Cc: Leo Yan Cc: Michael Petlan Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Nathan Chancellor Cc: Nick Desaulniers Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YkxWcYzph5pC1EK8@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

tools build: Use $(shell ) instead of `` to get embedded libperl's ccopts

2022-04-09T15:33:38+00:00

Just like its done for ldopts and for both in tools/perf/Makefile.config. Using `` to initialize PERL_EMBED_CCOPTS somehow precludes using: $(filter-out SOMETHING_TO_FILTER,$(PERL_EMBED_CCOPTS)) And we need to do it to allow for building with versions of clang where some gcc options selected by distros are not available. Tested-by: Sedat Dilek # Debian/Selfmade LLVM-14 (x86-64) Cc: Adrian Hunter Cc: Fangrui Song Cc: Florian Fainelli Cc: Ian Rogers Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: John Keeping Cc: Leo Yan Cc: Michael Petlan Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Nathan Chancellor Cc: Nick Desaulniers Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YktYX2OnLtyobRYD@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Merge https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next

2021-12-10T23:56:13+00:00

Andrii Nakryiko says: ==================== bpf-next 2021-12-10 v2 We've added 115 non-merge commits during the last 26 day(s) which contain a total of 182 files changed, 5747 insertions(+), 2564 deletions(-). The main changes are: 1) Various samples fixes, from Alexander Lobakin. 2) BPF CO-RE support in kernel and light skeleton, from Alexei Starovoitov. 3) A batch of new unified APIs for libbpf, logging improvements, version querying, etc. Also a batch of old deprecations for old APIs and various bug fixes, in preparation for libbpf 1.0, from Andrii Nakryiko. 4) BPF documentation reorganization and improvements, from Christoph Hellwig and Dave Tucker. 5) Support for declarative initialization of BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY in libbpf, from Hengqi Chen. 6) Verifier log fixes, from Hou Tao. 7) Runtime-bounded loops support with bpf_loop() helper, from Joanne Koong. 8) Extend branch record capturing to all platforms that support it, from Kajol Jain. 9) Light skeleton codegen improvements, from Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi. 10) bpftool doc-generating script improvements, from Quentin Monnet. 11) Two libbpf v0.6 bug fixes, from Shuyi Cheng and Vincent Minet. 12) Deprecation warning fix for perf/bpf_counter, from Song Liu. 13) MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT unification and MIPS build fix for libbpf, from Tiezhu Yang. 14) BTF_KING_TYPE_TAG follow-up fixes, from Yonghong Song. 15) Selftests fixes and improvements, from Ilya Leoshkevich, Jean-Philippe Brucker, Jiri Olsa, Maxim Mikityanskiy, Tirthendu Sarkar, Yucong Sun, and others. * https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (115 commits) libbpf: Add "bool skipped" to struct bpf_map libbpf: Fix typo in btf__dedup@LIBBPF_0.0.2 definition bpftool: Switch bpf_object__load_xattr() to bpf_object__load() selftests/bpf: Remove the only use of deprecated bpf_object__load_xattr() selftests/bpf: Add test for libbpf's custom log_buf behavior selftests/bpf: Replace all uses of bpf_load_btf() with bpf_btf_load() libbpf: Deprecate bpf_object__load_xattr() libbpf: Add per-program log buffer setter and getter libbpf: Preserve kernel error code and remove kprobe prog type guessing libbpf: Improve logging around BPF program loading libbpf: Allow passing user log setting through bpf_object_open_opts libbpf: Allow passing preallocated log_buf when loading BTF into kernel libbpf: Add OPTS-based bpf_btf_load() API libbpf: Fix bpf_prog_load() log_buf logic for log_level 0 samples/bpf: Remove unneeded variable bpf: Remove redundant assignment to pointer t selftests/bpf: Fix a compilation warning perf/bpf_counter: Use bpf_map_create instead of bpf_create_map samples: bpf: Fix 'unknown warning group' build warning on Clang samples: bpf: Fix xdp_sample_user.o linking with Clang ... ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210234746.2100561-1-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

kernel/linux.git/tools/build/feature, branch v5.19

perf build: Stop using __weak bpf_map_create() to handle older libbpf versions

perf build: Stop using __weak btf__raw_data() to handle older libbpf versions

perf build: Stop using __weak bpf_object__next_map() to handle older libbpf versions

perf build: Stop using __weak bpf_object__next_program() to handle older libbpf versions

perf build: Stop using __weak bpf_prog_load() to handle older libbpf versions

perf build: Fix btf__load_from_kernel_by_id() feature check

perf build: Fix check for btf__load_from_kernel_by_id() in libbpf

tools build: Filter out options and warnings not supported by clang

tools build: Use $(shell ) instead of `` to get embedded libperl's ccopts

Merge https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next

perf build: Stop using weak btfraw_data() to handle older libbpf versions