kernel/linux.git/security, branch v5.11.5

tomoyo: recognize kernel threads correctly

2021-03-09T10:21:23+00:00

commit 9c83465f3245c2faa82ffeb7016f40f02bfaa0ad upstream. Commit db68ce10c4f0a27c ("new helper: uaccess_kernel()") replaced segment_eq(get_fs(), KERNEL_DS) with uaccess_kernel(). But the correct method for tomoyo to check whether current is a kernel thread in order to assume that kernel threads are privileged for socket operations was (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD). Now that uaccess_kernel() became 0 on x86, tomoyo has to fix this problem. Do like commit 942cb357ae7d9249 ("Smack: Handle io_uring kernel thread privileges") does. Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

tomoyo: ignore data race while checking quota

2021-03-07T11:35:45+00:00

commit 5797e861e402fff2bedce4ec8b7c89f4248b6073 upstream. syzbot is reporting that tomoyo's quota check is racy [1]. But this check is tolerant of some degree of inaccuracy. Thus, teach KCSAN to ignore this data race. [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=999533deec7ba6337f8aa25d8bd1a4d5f7e50476 Reported-by: syzbot Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

smackfs: restrict bytes count in smackfs write functions

2021-03-07T11:35:45+00:00

commit 7ef4c19d245f3dc233fd4be5acea436edd1d83d8 upstream. syzbot found WARNINGs in several smackfs write operations where bytes count is passed to memdup_user_nul which exceeds GFP MAX_ORDER. Check count size if bigger than PAGE_SIZE. Per smackfs doc, smk_write_net4addr accepts any label or -CIPSO, smk_write_net6addr accepts any label or -DELETE. I couldn't find any general rule for other label lengths except SMK_LABELLEN, SMK_LONGLABEL, SMK_CIPSOMAX which are documented. Let's constrain, in general, smackfs label lengths for PAGE_SIZE. Although fuzzer crashes write to smackfs/netlabel on 0x400000 length. Here is a quick way to reproduce the WARNING: python -c "print('A' * 0x400000)" > /sys/fs/smackfs/netlabel Reported-by: syzbot+a71a442385a0b2815497@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

KEYS: trusted: Reserve TPM for seal and unseal operations

2021-03-04T11:15:25+00:00

commit 8c657a0590de585b1115847c17b34a58025f2f4b upstream. When TPM 2.0 trusted keys code was moved to the trusted keys subsystem, the operations were unwrapped from tpm_try_get_ops() and tpm_put_ops(), which are used to take temporarily the ownership of the TPM chip. The ownership is only taken inside tpm_send(), but this is not sufficient, as in the key load TPM2_CC_LOAD, TPM2_CC_UNSEAL and TPM2_FLUSH_CONTEXT need to be done as a one single atom. Take the TPM chip ownership before sending anything with tpm_try_get_ops() and tpm_put_ops(), and use tpm_transmit_cmd() to send TPM commands instead of tpm_send(), reverting back to the old behaviour. Fixes: 2e19e10131a0 ("KEYS: trusted: Move TPM2 trusted keys code") Reported-by: "James E.J. Bottomley" Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: David Howells Cc: Mimi Zohar Cc: Sumit Garg Acked-by Sumit Garg Tested-by: Mimi Zohar Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

KEYS: trusted: Fix migratable=1 failing

2021-03-04T11:15:25+00:00

commit 8da7520c80468c48f981f0b81fc1be6599e3b0ad upstream. Consider the following transcript: $ keyctl add trusted kmk "new 32 blobauth=helloworld keyhandle=80000000 migratable=1" @u add_key: Invalid argument The documentation has the following description: migratable= 0|1 indicating permission to reseal to new PCR values, default 1 (resealing allowed) The consequence is that "migratable=1" should succeed. Fix this by allowing this condition to pass instead of return -EINVAL. [*] Documentation/security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" Cc: Mimi Zohar Cc: David Howells Fixes: d00a1c72f7f4 ("keys: add new trusted key-type") Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

KEYS: trusted: Fix incorrect handling of tpm_get_random()

2021-03-04T11:15:25+00:00

commit 5df16caada3fba3b21cb09b85cdedf99507f4ec1 upstream. When tpm_get_random() was introduced, it defined the following API for the return value: 1. A positive value tells how many bytes of random data was generated. 2. A negative value on error. However, in the call sites the API was used incorrectly, i.e. as it would only return negative values and otherwise zero. Returning he positive read counts to the user space does not make any possible sense. Fix this by returning -EIO when tpm_get_random() returns a positive value. Fixes: 41ab999c80f1 ("tpm: Move tpm_get_random api into the TPM device driver") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mimi Zohar Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" Cc: David Howells Cc: Kent Yoder Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

selinux: fix inconsistency between inode_getxattr and inode_listsecurity

2021-03-04T11:15:24+00:00

commit a9ffe682c58aaff643764547f5420e978b6e0830 upstream. When inode has no listxattr op of its own (e.g. squashfs) vfs_listxattr calls the LSM inode_listsecurity hooks to list the xattrs that LSMs will intercept in inode_getxattr hooks. When selinux LSM is installed but not initialized, it will list the security.selinux xattr in inode_listsecurity, but will not intercept it in inode_getxattr. This results in -ENODATA for a getxattr call for an xattr returned by listxattr. This situation was manifested as overlayfs failure to copy up lower files from squashfs when selinux is built-in but not initialized, because ovl_copy_xattr() iterates the lower inode xattrs by vfs_listxattr() and vfs_getxattr(). Match the logic of inode_listsecurity to that of inode_getxattr and do not list the security.selinux xattr if selinux is not initialized. Reported-by: Michael Labriola Tested-by: Michael Labriola Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/2nv9d47zt7.fsf@aldarion.sourceruckus.org/ Fixes: c8e222616c7e ("selinux: allow reading labels before policy is loaded") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org#v5.9+ Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein Reviewed-by: Ondrej Mosnacek Signed-off-by: Paul Moore Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

certs: Fix blacklist flag type confusion

2021-03-04T11:14:41+00:00

[ Upstream commit 4993e1f9479a4161fd7d93e2b8b30b438f00cb0f ] KEY_FLAG_KEEP is not meant to be passed to keyring_alloc() or key_alloc(), as these only take KEY_ALLOC_* flags. KEY_FLAG_KEEP has the same value as KEY_ALLOC_BYPASS_RESTRICTION, but fortunately only key_create_or_update() uses it. LSMs using the key_alloc hook don't check that flag. KEY_FLAG_KEEP is then ignored but fortunately (again) the root user cannot write to the blacklist keyring, so it is not possible to remove a key/hash from it. Fix this by adding a KEY_ALLOC_SET_KEEP flag that tells key_alloc() to set KEY_FLAG_KEEP on the new key. blacklist_init() can then, correctly, pass this to keyring_alloc(). We can also use this in ima_mok_init() rather than setting the flag manually. Note that this doesn't fix an observable bug with the current implementation but it is required to allow addition of new hashes to the blacklist in the future without making it possible for them to be removed. Fixes: 734114f8782f ("KEYS: Add a system blacklist keyring") Reported-by: Mickaël Salaün Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: Mickaël Salaün cc: Mimi Zohar Cc: David Woodhouse Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

watch_queue: Drop references to /dev/watch_queue

2021-03-04T11:14:41+00:00

[ Upstream commit 8fe62e0c0e2efa5437f3ee81b65d69e70a45ecd2 ] The merged API doesn't use a watch_queue device, but instead relies on pipes, so let the documentation reflect that. Fixes: f7e47677e39a ("watch_queue: Add a key/keyring notification facility") Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi Signed-off-by: David Howells Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Reviewed-by: Ben Boeckel Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

capabilities: Don't allow writing ambiguous v3 file capabilities

2021-03-04T11:14:30+00:00

[ Upstream commit 95ebabde382c371572297915b104e55403674e73 ] The v3 file capabilities have a uid field that records the filesystem uid of the root user of the user namespace the file capabilities are valid in. When someone is silly enough to have the same underlying uid as the root uid of multiple nested containers a v3 filesystem capability can be ambiguous. In the spirit of don't do that then, forbid writing a v3 filesystem capability if it is ambiguous. Fixes: 8db6c34f1dbc ("Introduce v3 namespaced file capabilities") Reviewed-by: Andrew G. Morgan Reviewed-by: Serge Hallyn Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin