kernel/linux.git/security/selinux, branch v4.9.206

selinux: fix memory leak in policydb_init()

2019-08-06T16:29:40+00:00

commit 45385237f65aeee73641f1ef737d7273905a233f upstream. Since roles_init() adds some entries to the role hash table, we need to destroy also its keys/values on error, otherwise we get a memory leak in the error path. Cc: Reported-by: syzbot+fee3a14d4cdf92646287@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek Signed-off-by: Paul Moore Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

selinux: never allow relabeling on context mounts

2019-05-08T05:19:12+00:00

commit a83d6ddaebe541570291205cb538e35ad4ff94f9 upstream. In the SECURITY_FS_USE_MNTPOINT case we never want to allow relabeling files/directories, so we should never set the SBLABEL_MNT flag. The 'special handling' in selinux_is_sblabel_mnt() is only intended for when the behavior is set to SECURITY_FS_USE_GENFS. While there, make the logic in selinux_is_sblabel_mnt() more explicit and add a BUILD_BUG_ON() to make sure that introducing a new SECURITY_FS_USE_* forces a review of the logic. Fixes: d5f3a5f6e7e7 ("selinux: add security in-core xattr support for pstore and debugfs") Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek Reviewed-by: Stephen Smalley Signed-off-by: Paul Moore Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

selinux: do not override context on context mounts

2019-04-05T20:29:15+00:00

[ Upstream commit 53e0c2aa9a59a48e3798ef193d573ade85aa80f5 ] Ignore all selinux_inode_notifysecctx() calls on mounts with SBLABEL_MNT flag unset. This is achived by returning -EOPNOTSUPP for this case in selinux_inode_setsecurtity() (because that function should not be called in such case anyway) and translating this error to 0 in selinux_inode_notifysecctx(). This fixes behavior of kernfs-based filesystems when mounted with the 'context=' option. Before this patch, if a node's context had been explicitly set to a non-default value and later the filesystem has been remounted with the 'context=' option, then this node would show up as having the manually-set context and not the mount-specified one. Steps to reproduce: # mount -t cgroup2 cgroup2 /sys/fs/cgroup/unified # chcon unconfined_u:object_r:user_home_t:s0 /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/cgroup.stat # ls -lZ /sys/fs/cgroup/unified total 0 -r--r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:cgroup_t:s0 0 Dec 13 10:41 cgroup.controllers -rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:cgroup_t:s0 0 Dec 13 10:41 cgroup.max.depth -rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:cgroup_t:s0 0 Dec 13 10:41 cgroup.max.descendants -rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:cgroup_t:s0 0 Dec 13 10:41 cgroup.procs -r--r--r--. 1 root root unconfined_u:object_r:user_home_t:s0 0 Dec 13 10:41 cgroup.stat -rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:cgroup_t:s0 0 Dec 13 10:41 cgroup.subtree_control -rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:cgroup_t:s0 0 Dec 13 10:41 cgroup.threads # umount /sys/fs/cgroup/unified # mount -o context=system_u:object_r:tmpfs_t:s0 -t cgroup2 cgroup2 /sys/fs/cgroup/unified Result before: # ls -lZ /sys/fs/cgroup/unified total 0 -r--r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:tmpfs_t:s0 0 Dec 13 10:41 cgroup.controllers -rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:tmpfs_t:s0 0 Dec 13 10:41 cgroup.max.depth -rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:tmpfs_t:s0 0 Dec 13 10:41 cgroup.max.descendants -rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:tmpfs_t:s0 0 Dec 13 10:41 cgroup.procs -r--r--r--. 1 root root unconfined_u:object_r:user_home_t:s0 0 Dec 13 10:41 cgroup.stat -rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:tmpfs_t:s0 0 Dec 13 10:41 cgroup.subtree_control -rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:tmpfs_t:s0 0 Dec 13 10:41 cgroup.threads Result after: # ls -lZ /sys/fs/cgroup/unified total 0 -r--r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:tmpfs_t:s0 0 Dec 13 10:41 cgroup.controllers -rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:tmpfs_t:s0 0 Dec 13 10:41 cgroup.max.depth -rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:tmpfs_t:s0 0 Dec 13 10:41 cgroup.max.descendants -rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:tmpfs_t:s0 0 Dec 13 10:41 cgroup.procs -r--r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:tmpfs_t:s0 0 Dec 13 10:41 cgroup.stat -rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:tmpfs_t:s0 0 Dec 13 10:41 cgroup.subtree_control -rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:tmpfs_t:s0 0 Dec 13 10:41 cgroup.threads Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek Reviewed-by: Stephen Smalley Signed-off-by: Paul Moore Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

selinux: always allow mounting submounts

2019-01-26T08:38:33+00:00

[ Upstream commit 2cbdcb882f97a45f7475c67ac6257bbc16277dfe ] If a superblock has the MS_SUBMOUNT flag set, we should always allow mounting it. These mounts are done automatically by the kernel either as part of mounting some parent mount (e.g. debugfs always mounts tracefs under "tracing" for compatibility) or they are mounted automatically as needed on subdirectory accesses (e.g. NFS crossmnt mounts). Since such automounts are either an implicit consequence of the parent mount (which is already checked) or they can happen during regular accesses (where it doesn't make sense to check against the current task's context), the mount permission check should be skipped for them. Without this patch, attempts to access contents of an automounted directory can cause unexpected SELinux denials. In the current kernel tree, the MS_SUBMOUNT flag is set only via vfs_submount(), which is called only from the following places: - AFS, when automounting special "symlinks" referencing other cells - CIFS, when automounting "referrals" - NFS, when automounting subtrees - debugfs, when automounting tracefs In all cases the submounts are meant to be transparent to the user and it makes sense that if mounting the master is allowed, then so should be the automounts. Note that CAP_SYS_ADMIN capability checking is already skipped for (SB_KERNMOUNT|SB_SUBMOUNT) in: - sget_userns() in fs/super.c: if (!(flags & (SB_KERNMOUNT|SB_SUBMOUNT)) && !(type->fs_flags & FS_USERNS_MOUNT) && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) return ERR_PTR(-EPERM); - sget() in fs/super.c: /* Ensure the requestor has permissions over the target filesystem */ if (!(flags & (SB_KERNMOUNT|SB_SUBMOUNT)) && !ns_capable(user_ns, CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) return ERR_PTR(-EPERM); Verified internally on patched RHEL 7.6 with a reproducer using NFS+httpd and selinux-tesuite. Fixes: 93faccbbfa95 ("fs: Better permission checking for submounts") Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek Signed-off-by: Paul Moore Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

selinux: fix GPF on invalid policy

2019-01-23T07:10:56+00:00

commit 5b0e7310a2a33c06edc7eb81ffc521af9b2c5610 upstream. levdatum->level can be NULL if we encounter an error while loading the policy during sens_read prior to initializing it. Make sure sens_destroy handles that case correctly. Reported-by: syzbot+6664500f0f18f07a5c0e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Stephen Smalley Signed-off-by: Paul Moore Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

selinux: Add __GFP_NOWARN to allocation at str_read()

2018-12-01T08:44:18+00:00

commit 4458bba09788e70e8fb39ad003f087cd9dfbd6ac upstream. syzbot is hitting warning at str_read() [1] because len parameter can become larger than KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE. We don't need to emit warning for this case. [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=7f2f5aad79ea8663c296a2eedb81978401a908f0 Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa Reported-by: syzbot Signed-off-by: Paul Moore Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

selinux: use GFP_NOWAIT in the AVC kmem_caches

2018-09-19T20:47:11+00:00

commit 476accbe2f6ef69caeebe99f52a286e12ac35aee upstream. There is a strange __GFP_NOMEMALLOC usage pattern in SELinux, specifically GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC which doesn't make much sense. GFP_ATOMIC on its own allows to access memory reserves while __GFP_NOMEMALLOC dictates we cannot use memory reserves. Replace this with the much more sane GFP_NOWAIT in the AVC code as we can tolerate memory allocation failures in that code. Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko Acked-by: Mel Gorman Signed-off-by: Paul Moore Signed-off-by: Amit Pundir Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

selinux: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in xattr_getsecurity

2018-06-06T14:44:33+00:00

commit efe3de79e0b52ca281ef6691480c8c68c82a4657 upstream. Call trace: [] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x428 [] show_stack+0x28/0x38 [] dump_stack+0xd4/0x124 [] print_address_description+0x68/0x258 [] kasan_report.part.2+0x228/0x2f0 [] kasan_report+0x5c/0x70 [] check_memory_region+0x12c/0x1c0 [] memcpy+0x34/0x68 [] xattr_getsecurity+0xe0/0x160 [] vfs_getxattr+0xc8/0x120 [] getxattr+0x100/0x2c8 [] SyS_fgetxattr+0x64/0xa0 [] el0_svc_naked+0x24/0x28 If user get root access and calls security.selinux setxattr() with an embedded NUL on a file and then if some process performs a getxattr() on that file with a length greater than the actual length of the string, it would result in a panic. To fix this, add the actual length of the string to the security context instead of the length passed by the userspace process. Signed-off-by: Sachin Grover Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paul Moore Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

selinux: do not check open permission on sockets

2018-04-13T17:48:04+00:00

[ Upstream commit ccb544781d34afdb73a9a73ae53035d824d193bf ] open permission is currently only defined for files in the kernel (COMMON_FILE_PERMS rather than COMMON_FILE_SOCK_PERMS). Construction of an artificial test case that tries to open a socket via /proc/pid/fd will generate a recvfrom avc denial because recvfrom and open happen to map to the same permission bit in socket vs file classes. open of a socket via /proc/pid/fd is not supported by the kernel regardless and will ultimately return ENXIO. But we hit the permission check first and can thus produce these odd/misleading denials. Omit the open check when operating on a socket. Signed-off-by: Stephen Smalley Signed-off-by: Paul Moore Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

selinux: Remove redundant check for unknown labeling behavior

2018-04-08T10:12:47+00:00

commit 270e8573145a26de924e2dc644596332d400445b upstream. The check is already performed in ocontext_read() when the policy is loaded. Removing the array also fixes the following warning when building with clang: security/selinux/hooks.c:338:20: error: variable 'labeling_behaviors' is not needed and will not be emitted [-Werror,-Wunneeded-internal-declaration] Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke Acked-by: Stephen Smalley Signed-off-by: Paul Moore Cc: Nathan Chancellor Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman