kernel/linux.git/scripts/Makefile, branch v6.12.80

scripts: add boot policy generation program

2024-08-20T18:03:39+00:00

Enables an IPE policy to be enforced from kernel start, enabling access control based on trust from kernel startup. This is accomplished by transforming an IPE policy indicated by CONFIG_IPE_BOOT_POLICY into a c-string literal that is parsed at kernel startup as an unsigned policy. Signed-off-by: Deven Bowers Signed-off-by: Fan Wu Signed-off-by: Paul Moore

arch: um: rust: Add i386 support for Rust

2024-07-03T10:22:22+00:00

At present, Rust in the kernel only supports 64-bit x86, so UML has followed suit. However, it's significantly easier to support 32-bit i386 on UML than on bare metal, as UML does not use the -mregparm option (which alters the ABI), which is not yet supported by rustc[1]. Add support for CONFIG_RUST on um/i386, by adding a new target config to generate_rust_target, and replacing various checks on CONFIG_X86_64 to also support CONFIG_X86_32. We still use generate_rust_target, rather than a built-in rustc target, in order to match x86_64, provide a future place for -mregparm, and more easily disable floating point instructions. With these changes, the KUnit tests pass with: kunit.py run --make_options LLVM=1 --kconfig_add CONFIG_RUST=y --kconfig_add CONFIG_64BIT=n --kconfig_add CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=n An earlier version of these changes was proposed on the Rust-for-Linux github[2]. [1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116972 [2]: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/pull/966 Signed-off-by: David Gow Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240604224052.3138504-1-davidgow@google.com Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg

LoongArch: rust: Switch to use built-in rustc target

2024-05-14T04:24:18+00:00

This commit switches to use the LoongArch's built-in rustc target 'loongarch64-unknown-none-softfloat'. The Rust samples have been tested. Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda Tested-by: Miguel Ojeda Signed-off-by: WANG Rui Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen

Merge tag 'loongarch-6.9' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chenhuacai/linux-loongson

2024-03-22T17:22:45+00:00

Pull LoongArch updates from Huacai Chen: - Add objtool support for LoongArch - Add ORC stack unwinder support for LoongArch - Add kernel livepatching support for LoongArch - Select ARCH_HAS_CURRENT_STACK_POINTER in Kconfig - Select HAVE_ARCH_USERFAULTFD_MINOR in Kconfig - Some bug fixes and other small changes * tag 'loongarch-6.9' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chenhuacai/linux-loongson: LoongArch/crypto: Clean up useless assignment operations LoongArch: Define the __io_aw() hook as mmiowb() LoongArch: Remove superfluous flush_dcache_page() definition LoongArch: Move {dmw,tlb}_virt_to_page() definition to page.h LoongArch: Change __my_cpu_offset definition to avoid mis-optimization LoongArch: Select HAVE_ARCH_USERFAULTFD_MINOR in Kconfig LoongArch: Select ARCH_HAS_CURRENT_STACK_POINTER in Kconfig LoongArch: Add kernel livepatching support LoongArch: Add ORC stack unwinder support objtool: Check local label in read_unwind_hints() objtool: Check local label in add_dead_ends() objtool/LoongArch: Enable orc to be built objtool/x86: Separate arch-specific and generic parts objtool/LoongArch: Implement instruction decoder objtool/LoongArch: Enable objtool to be built

LoongArch: Add ORC stack unwinder support

2024-03-11T14:23:47+00:00

The kernel CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC option enables the ORC unwinder, which is similar in concept to a DWARF unwinder. The difference is that the format of the ORC data is much simpler than DWARF, which in turn allows the ORC unwinder to be much simpler and faster. The ORC data consists of unwind tables which are generated by objtool. After analyzing all the code paths of a .o file, it determines information about the stack state at each instruction address in the file and outputs that information to the .orc_unwind and .orc_unwind_ip sections. The per-object ORC sections are combined at link time and are sorted and post-processed at boot time. The unwinder uses the resulting data to correlate instruction addresses with their stack states at run time. Most of the logic are similar with x86, in order to get ra info before ra is saved into stack, add ra_reg and ra_offset into orc_entry. At the same time, modify some arch-specific code to silence the objtool warnings. Co-developed-by: Jinyang He Signed-off-by: Jinyang He Co-developed-by: Youling Tang Signed-off-by: Youling Tang Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen

rust: Refactor the build target to allow the use of builtin targets

2024-02-09T16:11:07+00:00

Eventually we want all architectures to be using the target as defined by rustc. However currently some architectures can't do that and are using the target.json specification. This puts in place the foundation to allow the use of the builtin target definition or a target.json specification. Signed-off-by: Jamie Cunliffe Acked-by: Masahiro Yamada Tested-by: Alice Ryhl Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231020155056.3495121-2-Jamie.Cunliffe@arm.com [catalin.marinas@arm.com: squashed loongarch ifneq fix from WANG Rui] Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas

rust: support running Rust documentation tests as KUnit ones

2023-07-19T15:32:53+00:00

Rust has documentation tests: these are typically examples of usage of any item (e.g. function, struct, module...). They are very convenient because they are just written alongside the documentation. For instance: /// Sums two numbers. /// /// ``` /// assert_eq!(mymod::f(10, 20), 30); /// ``` pub fn f(a: i32, b: i32) -> i32 { a + b } In userspace, the tests are collected and run via `rustdoc`. Using the tool as-is would be useful already, since it allows to compile-test most tests (thus enforcing they are kept in sync with the code they document) and run those that do not depend on in-kernel APIs. However, by transforming the tests into a KUnit test suite, they can also be run inside the kernel. Moreover, the tests get to be compiled as other Rust kernel objects instead of targeting userspace. On top of that, the integration with KUnit means the Rust support gets to reuse the existing testing facilities. For instance, the kernel log would look like: KTAP version 1 1..1 KTAP version 1 # Subtest: rust_doctests_kernel 1..59 # rust_doctest_kernel_build_assert_rs_0.location: rust/kernel/build_assert.rs:13 ok 1 rust_doctest_kernel_build_assert_rs_0 # rust_doctest_kernel_build_assert_rs_1.location: rust/kernel/build_assert.rs:56 ok 2 rust_doctest_kernel_build_assert_rs_1 # rust_doctest_kernel_init_rs_0.location: rust/kernel/init.rs:122 ok 3 rust_doctest_kernel_init_rs_0 ... # rust_doctest_kernel_types_rs_2.location: rust/kernel/types.rs:150 ok 59 rust_doctest_kernel_types_rs_2 # rust_doctests_kernel: pass:59 fail:0 skip:0 total:59 # Totals: pass:59 fail:0 skip:0 total:59 ok 1 rust_doctests_kernel Therefore, add support for running Rust documentation tests in KUnit. Some other notes about the current implementation and support follow. The transformation is performed by a couple scripts written as Rust hostprogs. Tests using the `?` operator are also supported as usual, e.g.: /// ``` /// # use kernel::{spawn_work_item, workqueue}; /// spawn_work_item!(workqueue::system(), || pr_info!("x"))?; /// # Ok::<(), Error>(()) /// ``` The tests are also compiled with Clippy under `CLIPPY=1`, just like normal code, thus also benefitting from extra linting. The names of the tests are currently automatically generated. This allows to reduce the burden for documentation writers, while keeping them fairly stable for bisection. This is an improvement over the `rustdoc`-generated names, which include the line number; but ideally we would like to get `rustdoc` to provide the Rust item path and a number (for multiple examples in a single documented Rust item). In order for developers to easily see from which original line a failed doctests came from, a KTAP diagnostic line is printed to the log, containing the location (file and line) of the original test (i.e. instead of the location in the generated Rust file): # rust_doctest_kernel_types_rs_2.location: rust/kernel/types.rs:150 This line follows the syntax for declaring test metadata in the proposed KTAP v2 spec [1], which may be used for the proposed KUnit test attributes API [2]. Thus hopefully this will make migration easier later on (suggested by David [3]). The original line in that test attribute is figured out by providing an anchor (suggested by Boqun [4]). The original file is found by walking the filesystem, checking directory prefixes to reduce the amount of combinations to check, and it is only done once per file. Ambiguities are detected and reported. A notable difference from KUnit C tests is that the Rust tests appear to assert using the usual `assert!` and `assert_eq!` macros from the Rust standard library (`core`). We provide a custom version that forwards the call to KUnit instead. Importantly, these macros do not require passing context, unlike the KUnit C ones (i.e. `struct kunit *`). This makes them easier to use, and readers of the documentation do not need to care about which testing framework is used. In addition, it may allow us to test third-party code more easily in the future. However, a current limitation is that KUnit does not support assertions in other tasks. Thus we presently simply print an error to the kernel log if an assertion actually failed. This should be revisited to properly fail the test, perhaps saving the context somewhere else, or letting KUnit handle it. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230420205734.1288498-1-rmoar@google.com/ [1] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20230707210947.1208717-1-rmoar@google.com/ [2] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/CABVgOSkOLO-8v6kdAGpmYnZUb+LKOX0CtYCo-Bge7r_2YTuXDQ@mail.gmail.com/ [3] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/ZIps86MbJF%2FiGIzd@boqun-archlinux/ [4] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda Reviewed-by: David Gow Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan

kbuild: use git-archive for source package creation

2023-03-16T13:46:12+00:00

Commit 5c3d1d0abb12 ("kbuild: add a tool to list files ignored by git") added a new tool, scripts/list-gitignored. My intention was to create source packages without cleaning the source tree, without relying on git. Linus strongly objected to it, and suggested using 'git archive' instead. [1] [2] [3] This commit goes in that direction - Remove scripts/list-gitignored.c and rewrites Makefiles and scripts to use 'git archive' for building Debian and RPM source packages. It also makes 'make perf-tar*-src-pkg' use 'git archive' again. Going forward, building source packages is only possible in a git-managed tree. Building binary packages does not require git. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wi49sMaC7vY1yMagk7eqLK=1jHeHQ=yZ_k45P=xBccnmA@mail.gmail.com/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wh5AixGsLeT0qH2oZHKq0FLUTbyTw4qY921L=PwYgoGVw@mail.gmail.com/ [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wgM-W6Fu==EoAVCabxyX8eYBz9kNC88-tm9ExRQwA79UQ@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: 5c3d1d0abb12 ("kbuild: add a tool to list files ignored by git") Fixes: e0ca16749ac3 ("kbuild: make perf-tar*-src-pkg work without relying on git") Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada

kbuild: add a tool to list files ignored by git

2023-02-16T08:00:41+00:00

In short, the motivation of this commit is to build a source package without cleaning the source tree. The deb-pkg and (src)rpm-pkg targets first run 'make clean' before creating a source tarball. Otherwise build artifacts such as *.o, *.a, etc. would be included in the tarball. Yet, the tarball ends up containing several garbage files since 'make clean' does not clean everything. Cleaning the tree every time is annoying since it makes the incremental build impossible. It is desirable to create a source tarball without cleaning the tree. In fact, there are some ways to achieve this. The easiest solution is 'git archive'. 'make perf-tar*-src-pkg' uses it, but I do not like it because it works only when the source tree is managed by git, and all files you want in the tarball must be committed in advance. I want to make it work without relying on git. We can do this. Files that are ignored by git are generated files, so should be excluded from the source tarball. We can list them out by parsing the .gitignore files. Of course, .gitignore does not cover all the cases, but it works well enough. tar(1) claims to support it: --exclude-vcs-ignores Exclude files that match patterns read from VCS-specific ignore files. Supported files are: .cvsignore, .gitignore, .bzrignore, and .hgignore. The best scenario would be to use 'tar --exclude-vcs-ignores', but this option does not work. --exclude-vcs-ignore does not understand any of the negation (!), preceding slash, following slash, etc.. So, this option is just useless. Hence, I wrote this gitignore parser. The previous version [1], written in Python, was so slow. This version is implemented in C, so it works much faster. I imported the code from git (commit: 23c56f7bd5f1), so we get the same result. This tool traverses the source tree, parsing all .gitignore files, and prints file paths that are ignored by git. The output is similar to 'git ls-files --ignored --directory --others --exclude-per-directory=.gitignore', except [1] Not sorted [2] No trailing slash for directories [2] is intentional because tar's --exclude-from option cannot handle trailing slashes. [How to test this tool] $ git clean -dfx $ make -s -j$(nproc) defconfig all # or allmodconifg or whatever $ git archive -o ../linux1.tar --prefix=./ HEAD $ tar tf ../linux1.tar | LANG=C sort > ../file-list1 # files emitted by 'git archive' $ make scripts_package HOSTCC scripts/list-gitignored $ scripts/list-gitignored --prefix=./ -o ../exclude-list $ tar cf ../linux2.tar --exclude-from=../exclude-list . $ tar tf ../linux2.tar | LANG=C sort > ../file-list2 # files emitted by 'tar' $ diff ../file-list1 ../file-list2 | grep -E '^(<|>)' < ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/.yamllint < ./drivers/clk/.kunitconfig < ./drivers/gpu/drm/tests/.kunitconfig < ./drivers/hid/.kunitconfig < ./fs/ext4/.kunitconfig < ./fs/fat/.kunitconfig < ./kernel/kcsan/.kunitconfig < ./lib/kunit/.kunitconfig < ./mm/kfence/.kunitconfig < ./tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/ < ./tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/.gitignore < ./tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/Makefile < ./tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/run_tags_test.sh < ./tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/tags_test.c < ./tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore < ./tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile < ./tools/testing/selftests/kvm/config < ./tools/testing/selftests/kvm/settings The source tarball contains most of files that are tracked by git. You see some diffs, but it is just because some .gitignore files are wrong. $ git ls-files -i -c --exclude-per-directory=.gitignore Documentation/devicetree/bindings/.yamllint drivers/clk/.kunitconfig drivers/gpu/drm/tests/.kunitconfig drivers/hid/.kunitconfig fs/ext4/.kunitconfig fs/fat/.kunitconfig kernel/kcsan/.kunitconfig lib/kunit/.kunitconfig mm/kfence/.kunitconfig tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/.gitignore tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/Makefile tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/run_tags_test.sh tools/testing/selftests/arm64/tags/tags_test.c tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile tools/testing/selftests/kvm/config tools/testing/selftests/kvm/settings [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230128173843.765212-1-masahiroy@kernel.org/ Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada

scripts: remove bin2c

2023-01-26T03:43:33+00:00

Commit 80f8be7af03f ("tomoyo: Omit use of bin2c") removed the last use of bin2c. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier Reviewed-by: Sedat Dilek