kernel/linux.git/net/vmw_vsock, branch v6.6.131

vmw_vsock: bypass false-positive Wnonnull warning with gcc-16

2026-03-04T12:20:49+00:00

[ Upstream commit e25dbf561e03c0c5e36228e3b8b784392819ce85 ] The gcc-16.0.1 snapshot produces a false-positive warning that turns into a build failure with CONFIG_WERROR: In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/string.h:6, from net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c:10: In function 'vmci_transport_packet_init', inlined from '__vmci_transport_send_control_pkt.constprop' at net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c:198:2: arch/x86/include/asm/string_32.h:150:25: error: argument 2 null where non-null expected because argument 3 is nonzero [-Werror=nonnull] 150 | #define memcpy(t, f, n) __builtin_memcpy(t, f, n) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c:164:17: note: in expansion of macro 'memcpy' 164 | memcpy(&pkt->u.wait, wait, sizeof(pkt->u.wait)); | ^~~~~~ arch/x86/include/asm/string_32.h:150:25: note: in a call to built-in function '__builtin_memcpy' net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c:164:17: note: in expansion of macro 'memcpy' 164 | memcpy(&pkt->u.wait, wait, sizeof(pkt->u.wait)); | ^~~~~~ This seems relatively harmless, and it so far the only instance of this warning I have found. The __vmci_transport_send_control_pkt function is called either with wait=NULL or with one of the type values that pass 'wait' into memcpy() here, but not from the same caller. Replacing the memcpy with a struct assignment is otherwise the same but avoids the warning. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Reviewed-by: Bobby Eshleman Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella Reviewed-by: Bryan Tan Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260203163406.2636463-1-arnd@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

vsock/virtio: cap TX credit to local buffer size

2026-01-30T09:27:37+00:00

[ Upstream commit 8ee784fdf006cbe8739cfa093f54d326cbf54037 ] The virtio transports derives its TX credit directly from peer_buf_alloc, which is set from the remote endpoint's SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_SIZE value. On the host side this means that the amount of data we are willing to queue for a connection is scaled by a guest-chosen buffer size, rather than the host's own vsock configuration. A malicious guest can advertise a large buffer and read slowly, causing the host to allocate a correspondingly large amount of sk_buff memory. The same thing would happen in the guest with a malicious host, since virtio transports share the same code base. Introduce a small helper, virtio_transport_tx_buf_size(), that returns min(peer_buf_alloc, buf_alloc), and use it wherever we consume peer_buf_alloc. This ensures the effective TX window is bounded by both the peer's advertised buffer and our own buf_alloc (already clamped to buffer_max_size via SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_MAX_SIZE), so a remote peer cannot force the other to queue more data than allowed by its own vsock settings. On an unpatched Ubuntu 22.04 host (~64 GiB RAM), running a PoC with 32 guest vsock connections advertising 2 GiB each and reading slowly drove Slab/SUnreclaim from ~0.5 GiB to ~57 GiB; the system only recovered after killing the QEMU process. That said, if QEMU memory is limited with cgroups, the maximum memory used will be limited. With this patch applied: Before: MemFree: ~61.6 GiB Slab: ~142 MiB SUnreclaim: ~117 MiB After 32 high-credit connections: MemFree: ~61.5 GiB Slab: ~178 MiB SUnreclaim: ~152 MiB Only ~35 MiB increase in Slab/SUnreclaim, no host OOM, and the guest remains responsive. Compatibility with non-virtio transports: - VMCI uses the AF_VSOCK buffer knobs to size its queue pairs per socket based on the local vsk->buffer_* values; the remote side cannot enlarge those queues beyond what the local endpoint configured. - Hyper-V's vsock transport uses fixed-size VMBus ring buffers and an MTU bound; there is no peer-controlled credit field comparable to peer_buf_alloc, and the remote endpoint cannot drive in-flight kernel memory above those ring sizes. - The loopback path reuses virtio_transport_common.c, so it naturally follows the same semantics as the virtio transport. This change is limited to virtio_transport_common.c and thus affects virtio-vsock, vhost-vsock, and loopback, bringing them in line with the "remote window intersected with local policy" behaviour that VMCI and Hyper-V already effectively have. Fixes: 06a8fc78367d ("VSOCK: Introduce virtio_vsock_common.ko") Suggested-by: Stefano Garzarella Signed-off-by: Melbin K Mathew [Stefano: small adjustments after changing the previous patch] [Stefano: tweak the commit message] Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella Reviewed-by: Luigi Leonardi Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260121093628.9941-4-sgarzare@redhat.com Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

vsock/virtio: fix potential underflow in virtio_transport_get_credit()

2026-01-30T09:27:37+00:00

[ Upstream commit 3ef3d52a1a9860d094395c7a3e593f3aa26ff012 ] The credit calculation in virtio_transport_get_credit() uses unsigned arithmetic: ret = vvs->peer_buf_alloc - (vvs->tx_cnt - vvs->peer_fwd_cnt); If the peer shrinks its advertised buffer (peer_buf_alloc) while bytes are in flight, the subtraction can underflow and produce a large positive value, potentially allowing more data to be queued than the peer can handle. Reuse virtio_transport_has_space() which already handles this case and add a comment to make it clear why we are doing that. Fixes: 06a8fc78367d ("VSOCK: Introduce virtio_vsock_common.ko") Suggested-by: Stefano Garzarella Signed-off-by: Melbin K Mathew [Stefano: use virtio_transport_has_space() instead of duplicating the code] [Stefano: tweak the commit message] Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella Reviewed-by: Luigi Leonardi Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260121093628.9941-2-sgarzare@redhat.com Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

vsock: Ignore signal/timeout on connect() if already established

2025-12-01T10:41:49+00:00

[ Upstream commit 002541ef650b742a198e4be363881439bb9d86b4 ] During connect(), acting on a signal/timeout by disconnecting an already established socket leads to several issues: 1. connect() invoking vsock_transport_cancel_pkt() -> virtio_transport_purge_skbs() may race with sendmsg() invoking virtio_transport_get_credit(). This results in a permanently elevated `vvs->bytes_unsent`. Which, in turn, confuses the SOCK_LINGER handling. 2. connect() resetting a connected socket's state may race with socket being placed in a sockmap. A disconnected socket remaining in a sockmap breaks sockmap's assumptions. And gives rise to WARNs. 3. connect() transitioning SS_CONNECTED -> SS_UNCONNECTED allows for a transport change/drop after TCP_ESTABLISHED. Which poses a problem for any simultaneous sendmsg() or connect() and may result in a use-after-free/null-ptr-deref. Do not disconnect socket on signal/timeout. Keep the logic for unconnected sockets: they don't linger, can't be placed in a sockmap, are rejected by sendmsg(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/e07fd95c-9a38-4eea-9638-133e38c2ec9b@rbox.co/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250317-vsock-trans-signal-race-v4-0-fc8837f3f1d4@rbox.co/ [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/60f1b7db-3099-4f6a-875e-af9f6ef194f6@rbox.co/ Fixes: d021c344051a ("VSOCK: Introduce VM Sockets") Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251119-vsock-interrupted-connect-v2-1-70734cf1233f@rbox.co Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

vsock: fix lock inversion in vsock_assign_transport()

2025-10-29T13:07:03+00:00

commit f7c877e7535260cc7a21484c994e8ce7e8cb6780 upstream. Syzbot reported a potential lock inversion deadlock between vsock_register_mutex and sk_lock-AF_VSOCK when vsock_linger() is called. The issue was introduced by commit 687aa0c5581b ("vsock: Fix transport_* TOCTOU") which added vsock_register_mutex locking in vsock_assign_transport() around the transport->release() call, that can call vsock_linger(). vsock_assign_transport() can be called with sk_lock held. vsock_linger() calls sk_wait_event() that temporarily releases and re-acquires sk_lock. During this window, if another thread hold vsock_register_mutex while trying to acquire sk_lock, a circular dependency is created. Fix this by releasing vsock_register_mutex before calling transport->release() and vsock_deassign_transport(). This is safe because we don't need to hold vsock_register_mutex while releasing the old transport, and we ensure the new transport won't disappear by obtaining a module reference first via try_module_get(). Reported-by: syzbot+10e35716f8e4929681fa@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: syzbot+10e35716f8e4929681fa@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 687aa0c5581b ("vsock: Fix transport_* TOCTOU") Cc: mhal@rbox.co Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251021121718.137668-1-sgarzare@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

vsock/virtio: Validate length in packet header before skb_put()

2025-08-28T14:28:36+00:00

commit 0dab92484474587b82e8e0455839eaf5ac7bf894 upstream. When receiving a vsock packet in the guest, only the virtqueue buffer size is validated prior to virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put(). Unfortunately, virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put() uses the length from the packet header as the length argument to skb_put(), potentially resulting in SKB overflow if the host has gone wonky. Validate the length as advertised by the packet header before calling virtio_vsock_skb_rx_put(). Cc: Fixes: 71dc9ec9ac7d ("virtio/vsock: replace virtio_vsock_pkt with sk_buff") Signed-off-by: Will Deacon Message-Id: <20250717090116.11987-3-will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

vsock/virtio: Resize receive buffers so that each SKB fits in a 4K page

2025-08-28T14:28:25+00:00

[ Upstream commit 03a92f036a04fed2b00d69f5f46f1a486e70dc5c ] When allocating receive buffers for the vsock virtio RX virtqueue, an SKB is allocated with a 4140 data payload (the 44-byte packet header + VIRTIO_VSOCK_DEFAULT_RX_BUF_SIZE). Even when factoring in the SKB overhead, the resulting 8KiB allocation thanks to the rounding in kmalloc_reserve() is wasteful (~3700 unusable bytes) and results in a higher-order page allocation on systems with 4KiB pages just for the sake of a few hundred bytes of packet data. Limit the vsock virtio RX buffers to 4KiB per SKB, resulting in much better memory utilisation and removing the need to allocate higher-order pages entirely. Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella Signed-off-by: Will Deacon Message-Id: <20250717090116.11987-5-will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

vsock: Do not allow binding to VMADDR_PORT_ANY

2025-08-15T10:09:05+00:00

commit aba0c94f61ec05315fa7815d21aefa4c87f6a9f4 upstream. It is possible for a vsock to autobind to VMADDR_PORT_ANY. This can cause a use-after-free when a connection is made to the bound socket. The socket returned by accept() also has port VMADDR_PORT_ANY but is not on the list of unbound sockets. Binding it will result in an extra refcount decrement similar to the one fixed in fcdd2242c023 (vsock: Keep the binding until socket destruction). Modify the check in __vsock_bind_connectible() to also prevent binding to VMADDR_PORT_ANY. Fixes: d021c344051a ("VSOCK: Introduce VM Sockets") Reported-by: Budimir Markovic Signed-off-by: Budimir Markovic Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250807041811.678-1-markovicbudimir@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

vsock: Fix IOCTL_VM_SOCKETS_GET_LOCAL_CID to check also `transport_local`

2025-07-17T16:35:10+00:00

[ Upstream commit 1e7d9df379a04ccd0c2f82f39fbb69d482e864cc ] Support returning VMADDR_CID_LOCAL in case no other vsock transport is available. Fixes: 0e12190578d0 ("vsock: add local transport support in the vsock core") Suggested-by: Stefano Garzarella Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250703-vsock-transports-toctou-v4-3-98f0eb530747@rbox.co Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

vsock: Fix transport_* TOCTOU

2025-07-17T16:35:09+00:00

[ Upstream commit 687aa0c5581b8d4aa87fd92973e4ee576b550cdf ] Transport assignment may race with module unload. Protect new_transport from becoming a stale pointer. This also takes care of an insecure call in vsock_use_local_transport(); add a lockdep assert. BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffbfff8056000 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN RIP: 0010:vsock_assign_transport+0x366/0x600 Call Trace: vsock_connect+0x59c/0xc40 __sys_connect+0xe8/0x100 __x64_sys_connect+0x6e/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x92/0x1c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 Fixes: c0cfa2d8a788 ("vsock: add multi-transports support") Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250703-vsock-transports-toctou-v4-2-98f0eb530747@rbox.co Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin