kernel/linux.git/net/rxrpc/call_object.c, branch v7.0.11

rxrpc: Fix DATA decrypt vs splice() by copying data to buffer in recvmsg

2026-06-01T15:54:52+00:00

[ Upstream commit d2bc90cf6c75cb96d2ce549be6c35efa3099d25b ] This improves the fix for CVE-2026-43500. Fix the pagecache corruption from in-place decryption of a DATA packet transmitted locally by splice() by getting rid of the packet sharing in the I/O thread and unconditionally extracting the packet content into a bounce buffer in which the buffer is decrypted. recvmsg() (or the kernel equivalent) then copies the data from the bounce buffer to the destination buffer. The sk_buff then remains unmodified. This has an additional advantage in that the packet is then arranged in the buffer with the correct alignment required for the crypto algorithms to process directly. The performance of the crypto does seem to be a little faster and, surprisingly, the unencrypted performance doesn't seem to change much - possibly due to removing complexity from the I/O thread. Yet another advantage is that the I/O thread doesn't have to copy packets which would slow down packet distribution, ACK generation, etc.. The buffer belongs to the call and is allocated initially at 2K, sufficiently large to hold a whole jumbo subpacket, but the buffer will be increased in size if needed. However, to take this work, MSG_PEEK may cause a later packet to be decrypted into the buffer, in which case the earlier one will need re-decrypting for a subsequent recvmsg(). Note that rx_pkt_offset may legitimately see 0 as a valid offset now, so switch to using USHRT_MAX to indicate an invalid offset. Note also that I would generally prefer to replace the buffers of the current sk_buff with a new kmalloc'd buffer of the right size, ditching the old data and frags as this makes the handling of MSG_PEEK easier and removes the re-decryption issue, but this looks like quite a complicated thing to achieve. skb_morph() looks half way to what I want, but I don't want to have to allocate a new sk_buff. Fixes: d0d5c0cd1e71 ("rxrpc: Use skb_unshare() rather than skb_cow_data()") Reported-by: Hyunwoo Kim Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/afKV2zGR6rrelPC7@v4bel/ Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: Simon Horman cc: Jiayuan Chen cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Altman Tested-by: Marc Dionne Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260515230516.2718212-3-dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

rxrpc: Fix key reference count leak from call->key

2026-04-09T01:44:32+00:00

When creating a client call in rxrpc_alloc_client_call(), the code obtains a reference to the key. This is never cleaned up and gets leaked when the call is destroyed. Fix this by freeing call->key in rxrpc_destroy_call(). Before the patch, it shows the key reference counter elevated: $ cat /proc/keys | grep afs@54321 1bffe9cd I--Q--i 8053480 4169w 3b010000 1000 1000 rxrpc afs@54321: ka $ After the patch, the invalidated key is removed when the code exits: $ cat /proc/keys | grep afs@54321 $ Fixes: f3441d4125fc ("rxrpc: Copy client call parameters into rxrpc_call earlier") Signed-off-by: Anderson Nascimento Co-developed-by: David Howells Signed-off-by: David Howells Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Altman cc: Marc Dionne cc: Simon Horman cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org cc: stable@kernel.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260408121252.2249051-9-dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

rxrpc: Fix call removal to use RCU safe deletion

2026-04-09T01:44:32+00:00

Fix rxrpc call removal from the rxnet->calls list to use list_del_rcu() rather than list_del_init() to prevent stuffing up reading /proc/net/rxrpc/calls from potentially getting into an infinite loop. This, however, means that list_empty() no longer works on an entry that's been deleted from the list, making it harder to detect prior deletion. Fix this by: Firstly, make rxrpc_destroy_all_calls() only dump the first ten calls that are unexpectedly still on the list. Limiting the number of steps means there's no need to call cond_resched() or to remove calls from the list here, thereby eliminating the need for rxrpc_put_call() to check for that. rxrpc_put_call() can then be fixed to unconditionally delete the call from the list as it is the only place that the deletion occurs. Fixes: 2baec2c3f854 ("rxrpc: Support network namespacing") Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260319150150.4189381-1-dhowells%40redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: Marc Dionne cc: Jeffrey Altman cc: Linus Torvalds cc: Simon Horman cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org cc: stable@kernel.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260408121252.2249051-5-dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

rxrpc: Fix notification vs call-release vs recvmsg

2025-07-17T14:50:48+00:00

When a call is released, rxrpc takes the spinlock and removes it from ->recvmsg_q in an effort to prevent racing recvmsg() invocations from seeing the same call. Now, rxrpc_recvmsg() only takes the spinlock when actually removing a call from the queue; it doesn't, however, take it in the lead up to that when it checks to see if the queue is empty. It *does* hold the socket lock, which prevents a recvmsg/recvmsg race - but this doesn't prevent sendmsg from ending the call because sendmsg() drops the socket lock and relies on the call->user_mutex. Fix this by firstly removing the bit in rxrpc_release_call() that dequeues the released call and, instead, rely on recvmsg() to simply discard released calls (done in a preceding fix). Secondly, rxrpc_notify_socket() is abandoned if the call is already marked as released rather than trying to be clever by setting both pointers in call->recvmsg_link to NULL to trick list_empty(). This isn't perfect and can still race, resulting in a released call on the queue, but recvmsg() will now clean that up. Fixes: 17926a79320a ("[AF_RXRPC]: Provide secure RxRPC sockets for use by userspace and kernel both") Signed-off-by: David Howells Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Altman cc: Marc Dionne cc: Junvyyang, Tencent Zhuque Lab cc: LePremierHomme cc: Simon Horman cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250717074350.3767366-4-dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

treewide, timers: Rename from_timer() to timer_container_of()

2025-06-08T07:07:37+00:00

Move this API to the canonical timer_*() namespace. [ tglx: Redone against pre rc1 ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aB2X0jCKQO56WdMt@gmail.com

rxrpc: Display security params in the afs_cb_call tracepoint

2025-04-15T00:36:42+00:00

Make the afs_cb_call tracepoint display some security parameters to make debugging easier. Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: Marc Dionne cc: Simon Horman cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250411095303.2316168-12-dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

rxrpc: Allow CHALLENGEs to the passed to the app for a RESPONSE

2025-04-15T00:36:41+00:00

Allow the app to request that CHALLENGEs be passed to it through an out-of-band queue that allows recvmsg() to pick it up so that the app can add data to it with sendmsg(). This will allow the application (AFS or userspace) to interact with the process if it wants to and put values into user-defined fields. This will be used by AFS when talking to a fileserver to supply that fileserver with a crypto key by which callback RPCs can be encrypted (ie. notifications from the fileserver to the client). Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: Marc Dionne cc: Simon Horman cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250411095303.2316168-5-dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

rxrpc: Remove some socket lock acquire/release annotations

2025-04-15T00:36:41+00:00

Remove some socket lock acquire/release annotations as lock_sock() and release_sock() don't have them and so the checker gets confused. Removing all of them, however, causes warnings about "context imbalance" and "wrong count at exit" to occur instead. Probably lock_sock() and release_sock() should have annotations on indicating their taking of sk_lock - there is a dep_map in socket_lock_t, but I don't know if that matters to the static checker. Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: Marc Dionne cc: Simon Horman cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250411095303.2316168-4-dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

treewide: Switch/rename to timer_delete[_sync]()

2025-04-05T08:30:12+00:00

timer_delete[_sync]() replaces del_timer[_sync](). Convert the whole tree over and remove the historical wrapper inlines. Conversion was done with coccinelle plus manual fixups where necessary. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

rxrpc: Fix call state set to not include the SERVER_SECURING state

2025-02-06T02:47:46+00:00

The RXRPC_CALL_SERVER_SECURING state doesn't really belong with the other states in the call's state set as the other states govern the call's Rx/Tx phase transition and govern when packets can and can't be received or transmitted. The "Securing" state doesn't actually govern the reception of packets and would need to be split depending on whether or not we've received the last packet yet (to mirror RECV_REQUEST/ACK_REQUEST). The "Securing" state is more about whether or not we can start forwarding packets to the application as recvmsg will need to decode them and the decoding can't take place until the challenge/response exchange has completed. Fix this by removing the RXRPC_CALL_SERVER_SECURING state from the state set and, instead, using a flag, RXRPC_CALL_CONN_CHALLENGING, to track whether or not we can queue the call for reception by recvmsg() or notify the kernel app that data is ready. In the event that we've already received all the packets, the connection event handler will poke the app layer in the appropriate manner. Also there's a race whereby the app layer sees the last packet before rxrpc has managed to end the rx phase and change the state to one amenable to allowing a reply. Fix this by queuing the packet after calling rxrpc_end_rx_phase(). Fixes: 17926a79320a ("[AF_RXRPC]: Provide secure RxRPC sockets for use by userspace and kernel both") Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: Marc Dionne cc: Simon Horman cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250204230558.712536-2-dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski