kernel/linux.git/net/rxrpc/call_object.c, branch v6.18.21

rxrpc: Fix notification vs call-release vs recvmsg

2025-07-17T14:50:48+00:00

When a call is released, rxrpc takes the spinlock and removes it from ->recvmsg_q in an effort to prevent racing recvmsg() invocations from seeing the same call. Now, rxrpc_recvmsg() only takes the spinlock when actually removing a call from the queue; it doesn't, however, take it in the lead up to that when it checks to see if the queue is empty. It *does* hold the socket lock, which prevents a recvmsg/recvmsg race - but this doesn't prevent sendmsg from ending the call because sendmsg() drops the socket lock and relies on the call->user_mutex. Fix this by firstly removing the bit in rxrpc_release_call() that dequeues the released call and, instead, rely on recvmsg() to simply discard released calls (done in a preceding fix). Secondly, rxrpc_notify_socket() is abandoned if the call is already marked as released rather than trying to be clever by setting both pointers in call->recvmsg_link to NULL to trick list_empty(). This isn't perfect and can still race, resulting in a released call on the queue, but recvmsg() will now clean that up. Fixes: 17926a79320a ("[AF_RXRPC]: Provide secure RxRPC sockets for use by userspace and kernel both") Signed-off-by: David Howells Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Altman cc: Marc Dionne cc: Junvyyang, Tencent Zhuque Lab cc: LePremierHomme cc: Simon Horman cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250717074350.3767366-4-dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

treewide, timers: Rename from_timer() to timer_container_of()

2025-06-08T07:07:37+00:00

Move this API to the canonical timer_*() namespace. [ tglx: Redone against pre rc1 ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aB2X0jCKQO56WdMt@gmail.com

rxrpc: Display security params in the afs_cb_call tracepoint

2025-04-15T00:36:42+00:00

Make the afs_cb_call tracepoint display some security parameters to make debugging easier. Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: Marc Dionne cc: Simon Horman cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250411095303.2316168-12-dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

rxrpc: Allow CHALLENGEs to the passed to the app for a RESPONSE

2025-04-15T00:36:41+00:00

Allow the app to request that CHALLENGEs be passed to it through an out-of-band queue that allows recvmsg() to pick it up so that the app can add data to it with sendmsg(). This will allow the application (AFS or userspace) to interact with the process if it wants to and put values into user-defined fields. This will be used by AFS when talking to a fileserver to supply that fileserver with a crypto key by which callback RPCs can be encrypted (ie. notifications from the fileserver to the client). Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: Marc Dionne cc: Simon Horman cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250411095303.2316168-5-dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

rxrpc: Remove some socket lock acquire/release annotations

2025-04-15T00:36:41+00:00

Remove some socket lock acquire/release annotations as lock_sock() and release_sock() don't have them and so the checker gets confused. Removing all of them, however, causes warnings about "context imbalance" and "wrong count at exit" to occur instead. Probably lock_sock() and release_sock() should have annotations on indicating their taking of sk_lock - there is a dep_map in socket_lock_t, but I don't know if that matters to the static checker. Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: Marc Dionne cc: Simon Horman cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250411095303.2316168-4-dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

treewide: Switch/rename to timer_delete[_sync]()

2025-04-05T08:30:12+00:00

timer_delete[_sync]() replaces del_timer[_sync](). Convert the whole tree over and remove the historical wrapper inlines. Conversion was done with coccinelle plus manual fixups where necessary. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

rxrpc: Fix call state set to not include the SERVER_SECURING state

2025-02-06T02:47:46+00:00

The RXRPC_CALL_SERVER_SECURING state doesn't really belong with the other states in the call's state set as the other states govern the call's Rx/Tx phase transition and govern when packets can and can't be received or transmitted. The "Securing" state doesn't actually govern the reception of packets and would need to be split depending on whether or not we've received the last packet yet (to mirror RECV_REQUEST/ACK_REQUEST). The "Securing" state is more about whether or not we can start forwarding packets to the application as recvmsg will need to decode them and the decoding can't take place until the challenge/response exchange has completed. Fix this by removing the RXRPC_CALL_SERVER_SECURING state from the state set and, instead, using a flag, RXRPC_CALL_CONN_CHALLENGING, to track whether or not we can queue the call for reception by recvmsg() or notify the kernel app that data is ready. In the event that we've already received all the packets, the connection event handler will poke the app layer in the appropriate manner. Also there's a race whereby the app layer sees the last packet before rxrpc has managed to end the rx phase and change the state to one amenable to allowing a reply. Fix this by queuing the packet after calling rxrpc_end_rx_phase(). Fixes: 17926a79320a ("[AF_RXRPC]: Provide secure RxRPC sockets for use by userspace and kernel both") Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: Marc Dionne cc: Simon Horman cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250204230558.712536-2-dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

rxrpc: Implement RACK/TLP to deal with transmission stalls [RFC8985]

2024-12-09T21:48:33+00:00

When an rxrpc call is in its transmission phase and is sending a lot of packets, stalls occasionally occur that cause severe performance degradation (eg. increasing the transmission time for a 256MiB payload from 0.7s to 2.5s over a 10G link). rxrpc already implements TCP-style congestion control [RFC5681] and this helps mitigate the effects, but occasionally we're missing a time event that deals with a missing ACK, leading to a stall until the RTO expires. Fix this by implementing RACK/TLP in rxrpc. Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: Marc Dionne cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

rxrpc: Manage RTT per-call rather than per-peer

2024-12-09T21:48:32+00:00

Manage the determination of RTT on a per-call (ie. per-RPC op) basis rather than on a per-peer basis, averaging across all calls going to that peer. The problem is that the RTT measurements from the initial packets on a call may be off because the server may do some setting up (such as getting a lock on a file) before accepting the rest of the data in the RPC and, further, the RTT may be affected by server-side file operations, for instance if a large amount of data is being written or read. Note: When handling the FS.StoreData-type RPCs, for example, the server uses the userStatus field in the header of ACK packets as supplementary flow control to aid in managing this. AF_RXRPC does not yet support this, but it should be added. Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: Marc Dionne cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

rxrpc: Use irq-disabling spinlocks between app and I/O thread

2024-12-09T21:48:31+00:00

Where a spinlock is used by both the application thread and the I/O thread, use irq-disabling locking so that an interrupt taken on the app thread doesn't also slow down the I/O thread. Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: Marc Dionne cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski