kernel/linux.git/net/rose, branch v5.10.257

net/rose: fix NULL pointer dereference in rose_transmit_link on reconnect

2026-04-18T08:31:01+00:00

[ Upstream commit e1f0a18c9564cdb16523c802e2c6fe5874e3d944 ] syzkaller reported a bug [1], and the reproducer is available at [2]. ROSE sockets use four sk->sk_state values: TCP_CLOSE, TCP_LISTEN, TCP_SYN_SENT, and TCP_ESTABLISHED. rose_connect() already rejects calls for TCP_ESTABLISHED (-EISCONN) and TCP_CLOSE with SS_CONNECTING (-ECONNREFUSED), but lacks a check for TCP_SYN_SENT. When rose_connect() is called a second time while the first connection attempt is still in progress (TCP_SYN_SENT), it overwrites rose->neighbour via rose_get_neigh(). If that returns NULL, the socket is left with rose->state == ROSE_STATE_1 but rose->neighbour == NULL. When the socket is subsequently closed, rose_release() sees ROSE_STATE_1 and calls rose_write_internal() -> rose_transmit_link(skb, NULL), causing a NULL pointer dereference. Per connect(2), a second connect() while a connection is already in progress should return -EALREADY. Add this missing check for TCP_SYN_SENT to complete the state validation in rose_connect(). [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d00f90e0af54102fb271 [2] https://gist.github.com/mrpre/9e6779e0d13e2c66779b1653fef80516 Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Reported-by: syzbot+d00f90e0af54102fb271@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/69694d6f.050a0220.58bed.0027.GAE@google.com/T/ Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260311070611.76913-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

net: rose: fix invalid array index in rose_kill_by_device()

2026-01-19T12:11:54+00:00

[ Upstream commit 6595beb40fb0ec47223d3f6058ee40354694c8e4 ] rose_kill_by_device() collects sockets into a local array[] and then iterates over them to disconnect sockets bound to a device being brought down. The loop mistakenly indexes array[cnt] instead of array[i]. For cnt < ARRAY_SIZE(array), this reads an uninitialized entry; for cnt == ARRAY_SIZE(array), it is an out-of-bounds read. Either case can lead to an invalid socket pointer dereference and also leaks references taken via sock_hold(). Fix the index to use i. Fixes: 64b8bc7d5f143 ("net/rose: fix races in rose_kill_by_device()") Co-developed-by: Fatma Alwasmi Signed-off-by: Fatma Alwasmi Signed-off-by: Pwnverse Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251222212227.4116041-1-ritviktanksalkar@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

rose: fix dangling neighbour pointers in rose_rt_device_down()

2025-07-17T16:27:47+00:00

[ Upstream commit 34a500caf48c47d5171f4aa1f237da39b07c6157 ] There are two bugs in rose_rt_device_down() that can cause use-after-free: 1. The loop bound `t->count` is modified within the loop, which can cause the loop to terminate early and miss some entries. 2. When removing an entry from the neighbour array, the subsequent entries are moved up to fill the gap, but the loop index `i` is still incremented, causing the next entry to be skipped. For example, if a node has three neighbours (A, A, B) with count=3 and A is being removed, the second A is not checked. i=0: (A, A, B) -> (A, B) with count=2 ^ checked i=1: (A, B) -> (A, B) with count=2 ^ checked (B, not A!) i=2: (doesn't occur because i < count is false) This leaves the second A in the array with count=2, but the rose_neigh structure has been freed. Code that accesses these entries assumes that the first `count` entries are valid pointers, causing a use-after-free when it accesses the dangling pointer. Fix both issues by iterating over the array in reverse order with a fixed loop bound. This ensures that all entries are examined and that the removal of an entry doesn't affect subsequent iterations. Reported-by: syzbot+e04e2c007ba2c80476cb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e04e2c007ba2c80476cb Tested-by: syzbot+e04e2c007ba2c80476cb@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Signed-off-by: Kohei Enju Reviewed-by: Simon Horman Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250629030833.6680-1-enjuk@amazon.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

net: rose: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

2025-07-17T16:27:47+00:00

[ Upstream commit 90d181ca488f466904ea59dd5c836f766b69c71b ] In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple warnings by explicitly adding multiple break statements instead of letting the code fall through to the next case. Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Stable-dep-of: 34a500caf48c ("rose: fix dangling neighbour pointers in rose_rt_device_down()") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

net: rose: lock the socket in rose_bind()

2025-03-13T11:47:05+00:00

[ Upstream commit a1300691aed9ee852b0a9192e29e2bdc2411a7e6 ] syzbot reported a soft lockup in rose_loopback_timer(), with a repro calling bind() from multiple threads. rose_bind() must lock the socket to avoid this issue. Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Reported-by: syzbot+7ff41b5215f0c534534e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/67a0f78d.050a0220.d7c5a.00a0.GAE@google.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Acked-by: Paolo Abeni Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250203170838.3521361-1-edumazet@google.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

net: rose: fix timer races against user threads

2025-03-13T11:46:57+00:00

[ Upstream commit 5de7665e0a0746b5ad7943554b34db8f8614a196 ] Rose timers only acquire the socket spinlock, without checking if the socket is owned by one user thread. Add a check and rearm the timers if needed. BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in rose_timer_expiry+0x31d/0x360 net/rose/rose_timer.c:174 Read of size 2 at addr ffff88802f09b82a by task swapper/0/0 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc5-syzkaller-00172-gd1bf27c4e176 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline] print_report+0x169/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:489 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:602 rose_timer_expiry+0x31d/0x360 net/rose/rose_timer.c:174 call_timer_fn+0x187/0x650 kernel/time/timer.c:1793 expire_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1844 [inline] __run_timers kernel/time/timer.c:2418 [inline] __run_timer_base+0x66a/0x8e0 kernel/time/timer.c:2430 run_timer_base kernel/time/timer.c:2439 [inline] run_timer_softirq+0xb7/0x170 kernel/time/timer.c:2449 handle_softirqs+0x2d4/0x9b0 kernel/softirq.c:561 __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:595 [inline] invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:435 [inline] __irq_exit_rcu+0xf7/0x220 kernel/softirq.c:662 irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:678 instr_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049 [inline] sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa6/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049 Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Reported-by: syzbot Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250122180244.1861468-1-edumazet@google.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

net/rose: prevent integer overflows in rose_setsockopt()

2025-03-13T11:46:50+00:00

[ Upstream commit d640627663bfe7d8963c7615316d7d4ef60f3b0b ] In case of possible unpredictably large arguments passed to rose_setsockopt() and multiplied by extra values on top of that, integer overflows may occur. Do the safest minimum and fix these issues by checking the contents of 'opt' and returning -EINVAL if they are too large. Also, switch to unsigned int and remove useless check for negative 'opt' in ROSE_IDLE case. Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Signed-off-by: Nikita Zhandarovich Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250115164220.19954-1-n.zhandarovich@fintech.ru Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

net/rose: fix races in rose_kill_by_device()

2024-01-05T14:12:24+00:00

[ Upstream commit 64b8bc7d5f1434c636a40bdcfcd42b278d1714be ] syzbot found an interesting netdev refcounting issue in net/rose/af_rose.c, thanks to CONFIG_NET_DEV_REFCNT_TRACKER=y [1] Problem is that rose_kill_by_device() can change rose->device while other threads do not expect the pointer to be changed. We have to first collect sockets in a temporary array, then perform the changes while holding the socket lock and rose_list_lock spinlock (in this order) Change rose_release() to also acquire rose_list_lock before releasing the netdev refcount. [1] [ 1185.055088][ T7889] ref_tracker: reference already released. [ 1185.061476][ T7889] ref_tracker: allocated in: [ 1185.066081][ T7889] rose_bind+0x4ab/0xd10 [ 1185.070446][ T7889] __sys_bind+0x1ec/0x220 [ 1185.074818][ T7889] __x64_sys_bind+0x72/0xb0 [ 1185.079356][ T7889] do_syscall_64+0x40/0x110 [ 1185.083897][ T7889] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1185.089835][ T7889] ref_tracker: freed in: [ 1185.094088][ T7889] rose_release+0x2f5/0x570 [ 1185.098629][ T7889] __sock_release+0xae/0x260 [ 1185.103262][ T7889] sock_close+0x1c/0x20 [ 1185.107453][ T7889] __fput+0x270/0xbb0 [ 1185.111467][ T7889] task_work_run+0x14d/0x240 [ 1185.116085][ T7889] get_signal+0x106f/0x2790 [ 1185.120622][ T7889] arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x90/0x7f0 [ 1185.126205][ T7889] exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x121/0x240 [ 1185.131846][ T7889] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1e/0x60 [ 1185.137293][ T7889] do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x110 [ 1185.141783][ T7889] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1185.148085][ T7889] ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 7889 at lib/ref_tracker.c:255 ref_tracker_free+0x61a/0x810 lib/ref_tracker.c:255 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 7889 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc4-syzkaller-00162-g65c95f78917e #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 11/10/2023 RIP: 0010:ref_tracker_free+0x61a/0x810 lib/ref_tracker.c:255 Code: 00 44 8b 6b 18 31 ff 44 89 ee e8 21 62 f5 fc 45 85 ed 0f 85 a6 00 00 00 e8 a3 66 f5 fc 48 8b 34 24 48 89 ef e8 27 5f f1 05 90 <0f> 0b 90 bb ea ff ff ff e9 52 fd ff ff e8 84 66 f5 fc 4c 8d 6d 44 RSP: 0018:ffffc90004917850 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000201 RBX: ffff88802618f4c0 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000202 RSI: ffffffff8accb920 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: ffff8880269ea5b8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: fffffbfff23e35f6 R10: ffffffff91f1afb7 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 1ffff92000922f0c R13: 0000000005a2039b R14: ffff88802618f4d8 R15: 00000000ffffffff FS: 00007f0a720ef6c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f43a819d988 CR3: 0000000076c64000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: netdev_tracker_free include/linux/netdevice.h:4127 [inline] netdev_put include/linux/netdevice.h:4144 [inline] netdev_put include/linux/netdevice.h:4140 [inline] rose_kill_by_device net/rose/af_rose.c:195 [inline] rose_device_event+0x25d/0x330 net/rose/af_rose.c:218 notifier_call_chain+0xb6/0x3b0 kernel/notifier.c:93 call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0xbe/0x130 net/core/dev.c:1967 call_netdevice_notifiers_extack net/core/dev.c:2005 [inline] call_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:2019 [inline] __dev_notify_flags+0x1f5/0x2e0 net/core/dev.c:8646 dev_change_flags+0x122/0x170 net/core/dev.c:8682 dev_ifsioc+0x9ad/0x1090 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:529 dev_ioctl+0x224/0x1090 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:786 sock_do_ioctl+0x198/0x270 net/socket.c:1234 sock_ioctl+0x22e/0x6b0 net/socket.c:1339 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:871 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:857 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x18f/0x210 fs/ioctl.c:857 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x40/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b RIP: 0033:0x7f0a7147cba9 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f0a720ef0c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f0a7159bf80 RCX: 00007f0a7147cba9 RDX: 0000000020000040 RSI: 0000000000008914 RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 00007f0a714c847a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007f0a7159bf80 R15: 00007ffc8bb3a5f8 Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Reported-by: syzbot Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Cc: Bernard Pidoux Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

net/rose: Fix Use-After-Free in rose_ioctl

2023-12-20T14:44:28+00:00

[ Upstream commit 810c38a369a0a0ce625b5c12169abce1dd9ccd53 ] Because rose_ioctl() accesses sk->sk_receive_queue without holding a sk->sk_receive_queue.lock, it can cause a race with rose_accept(). A use-after-free for skb occurs with the following flow. ``` rose_ioctl() -> skb_peek() rose_accept() -> skb_dequeue() -> kfree_skb() ``` Add sk->sk_receive_queue.lock to rose_ioctl() to fix this issue. Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231209100538.GA407321@v4bel-B760M-AORUS-ELITE-AX Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

net/rose: Fix to not accept on connected socket

2023-02-22T11:55:53+00:00

[ Upstream commit 14caefcf9837a2be765a566005ad82cd0d2a429f ] If you call listen() and accept() on an already connect()ed rose socket, accept() can successfully connect. This is because when the peer socket sends data to sendmsg, the skb with its own sk stored in the connected socket's sk->sk_receive_queue is connected, and rose_accept() dequeues the skb waiting in the sk->sk_receive_queue. This creates a child socket with the sk of the parent rose socket, which can cause confusion. Fix rose_listen() to return -EINVAL if the socket has already been successfully connected, and add lock_sock to prevent this issue. Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230125105944.GA133314@ubuntu Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin