Linux kernel stable tree (mirror) https://git.radix-linux.su/kernel/linux.git/atom?h=v5.18 2022-02-25T01:54:25+00:00 2022-02-25T01:54:25+00:00 Jakub Kicinski kuba@kernel.org 2022-02-25T01:54:25+00:00 urn:sha1:aaa25a2fa7964d94690f6de5edd7164ca7d76555 tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh 34aa6e3bccd8 ("selftests: mptcp: add ip mptcp wrappers") 857898eb4b28 ("selftests: mptcp: add missing join check") 6ef84b1517e0 ("selftests: mptcp: more robust signal race test") https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220221131842.468893-1-broonie@kernel.org/ drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc/act/act.h drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc/act/ct.c fb7e76ea3f3b6 ("net/mlx5e: TC, Skip redundant ct clear actions") c63741b426e11 ("net/mlx5e: Fix MPLSoUDP encap to use MPLS action information") 09bf97923224f ("net/mlx5e: TC, Move pedit_headers_action to parse_attr") 84ba8062e383 ("net/mlx5e: Test CT and SAMPLE on flow attr") efe6f961cd2e ("net/mlx5e: CT, Don't set flow flag CT for ct clear flow") 3b49a7edec1d ("net/mlx5e: TC, Reject rules with multiple CT actions") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> 2022-02-21T11:41:30+00:00 Tao Liu thomas.liu@ucloud.cn 2022-02-18T14:35:24+00:00 urn:sha1:cc20cced0598d9a5ff91ae4ab147b3b5e99ee819 We encounter a tcp drop issue in our cloud environment. Packet GROed in host forwards to a VM virtio_net nic with net_failover enabled. VM acts as a IPVS LB with ipip encapsulation. The full path like: host gro -> vm virtio_net rx -> net_failover rx -> ipvs fullnat -> ipip encap -> net_failover tx -> virtio_net tx When net_failover transmits a ipip pkt (gso_type = 0x0103, which means SKB_GSO_TCPV4, SKB_GSO_DODGY and SKB_GSO_IPXIP4), there is no gso did because it supports TSO and GSO_IPXIP4. But network_header points to inner ip header. Call Trace: tcp4_gso_segment ------> return NULL inet_gso_segment ------> inner iph, network_header points to ipip_gso_segment inet_gso_segment ------> outer iph skb_mac_gso_segment Afterwards virtio_net transmits the pkt, only inner ip header is modified. And the outer one just keeps unchanged. The pkt will be dropped in remote host. Call Trace: inet_gso_segment ------> inner iph, outer iph is skipped skb_mac_gso_segment __skb_gso_segment validate_xmit_skb validate_xmit_skb_list sch_direct_xmit __qdisc_run __dev_queue_xmit ------> virtio_net dev_hard_start_xmit __dev_queue_xmit ------> net_failover ip_finish_output2 ip_output iptunnel_xmit ip_tunnel_xmit ipip_tunnel_xmit ------> ipip dev_hard_start_xmit __dev_queue_xmit ip_finish_output2 ip_output ip_forward ip_rcv __netif_receive_skb_one_core netif_receive_skb_internal napi_gro_receive receive_buf virtnet_poll net_rx_action The root cause of this issue is specific with the rare combination of SKB_GSO_DODGY and a tunnel device that adds an SKB_GSO_ tunnel option. SKB_GSO_DODGY is set from external virtio_net. We need to reset network header when callbacks.gso_segment() returns NULL. This patch also includes ipv6_gso_segment(), considering SIT, etc. Fixes: cb32f511a70b ("ipip: add GSO/TSO support") Signed-off-by: Tao Liu <thomas.liu@ucloud.cn> Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> 2022-01-25T13:05:11+00:00 Jakub Kicinski kuba@kernel.org 2022-01-25T04:44:44+00:00 urn:sha1:6fc2f3832d36d74289680a1bf4484def8321f6e0 IPv6 GRO considers packets to belong to different flows when their hop_limit is different. This seems counter-intuitive, the flow is the same. hop_limit may vary because of various bugs or hacks but that doesn't mean it's okay for GRO to reorder packets. Practical impact of this problem on overall TCP performance is unclear, but TCP itself detects this reordering and bumps TCPSACKReorder resulting in user complaints. Eric warns that there may be performance regressions in setups which do packet spraying across links with similar RTT but different hop count. To be safe let's target -next and not treat this as a fix. If the packet spraying is using flow label there should be no difference in behavior as flow label is checked first. Note that the code plays an easy to miss trick by upcasting next_hdr to a u16 pointer and compares next_hdr and hop_limit in one go. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> 2021-12-02T19:44:56+00:00 Jakub Kicinski kuba@kernel.org 2021-12-02T19:44:56+00:00 urn:sha1:fc993be36f9ea7fc286d84d8471a1a20e871aad4 Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> 2021-12-02T12:21:11+00:00 Jiapeng Chong jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com 2021-12-02T08:30:42+00:00 urn:sha1:1ebb87cc8928360d0eabf987d80512c7786594b1 Eliminate the follow smatch warning: net/ipv6/ip6_offload.c:249 ipv6_gro_receive() warn: inconsistent indenting. Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> 2021-11-25T01:21:42+00:00 Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com 2021-11-23T22:56:08+00:00 urn:sha1:627b94f75b82d13d1530b59155a545fd99d807db All gro_complete() handlers are called from napi_gro_complete() while rcu_read_lock() has been called. There is no point stacking more rcu_read_lock() Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> 2021-11-25T01:21:42+00:00 Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com 2021-11-23T22:56:07+00:00 urn:sha1:fc1ca3348a74a1afaa7ffebc2b2f2cc149e11278 All gro_receive() handlers are called from dev_gro_receive() while rcu_read_lock() has been called. There is no point stacking more rcu_read_lock() Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> 2021-02-05T02:37:57+00:00 Leon Romanovsky leonro@nvidia.com 2021-02-03T13:51:11+00:00 urn:sha1:04f00ab2275f60658b5e4996e28f52ab1bc51d75 Fir the following compilation warnings: 1031 | INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE void udp_v6_early_demux(struct sk_buff *skb) net/ipv6/ip6_offload.c:182:41: warning: no previous prototype for ‘ipv6_gro_receive’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] 182 | INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE struct sk_buff *ipv6_gro_receive(struct list_head *head, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ net/ipv6/ip6_offload.c:320:29: warning: no previous prototype for ‘ipv6_gro_complete’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] 320 | INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE int ipv6_gro_complete(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhoff) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ net/ipv6/ip6_offload.c:182:41: warning: no previous prototype for ‘ipv6_gro_receive’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] 182 | INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE struct sk_buff *ipv6_gro_receive(struct list_head *head, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ net/ipv6/ip6_offload.c:320:29: warning: no previous prototype for ‘ipv6_gro_complete’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] 320 | INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE int ipv6_gro_complete(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhoff) Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> 2020-06-24T03:10:15+00:00 Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com 2020-06-23T22:31:15+00:00 urn:sha1:6db693285cd109e566c553694002dea769612b24 This removes following warnings : CC net/ipv4/udp_offload.o net/ipv4/udp_offload.c:504:17: warning: no previous prototype for 'udp4_gro_receive' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 504 | struct sk_buff *udp4_gro_receive(struct list_head *head, struct sk_buff *skb) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ net/ipv4/udp_offload.c:584:29: warning: no previous prototype for 'udp4_gro_complete' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 584 | INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE int udp4_gro_complete(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhoff) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CHECK net/ipv6/udp_offload.c net/ipv6/udp_offload.c:115:16: warning: symbol 'udp6_gro_receive' was not declared. Should it be static? net/ipv6/udp_offload.c:148:29: warning: symbol 'udp6_gro_complete' was not declared. Should it be static? CC net/ipv6/udp_offload.o net/ipv6/udp_offload.c:115:17: warning: no previous prototype for 'udp6_gro_receive' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 115 | struct sk_buff *udp6_gro_receive(struct list_head *head, struct sk_buff *skb) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ net/ipv6/udp_offload.c:148:29: warning: no previous prototype for 'udp6_gro_complete' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 148 | INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE int udp6_gro_complete(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhoff) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> 2020-06-24T03:10:15+00:00 Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com 2020-06-23T22:31:14+00:00 urn:sha1:5521d95e076238f1615cf1cdb135f318ef798b49 This patch removes following (C=1 W=1) warnings for CONFIG_RETPOLINE=y : net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c:306:16: warning: symbol 'tcp4_gro_receive' was not declared. Should it be static? net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c:306:17: warning: no previous prototype for 'tcp4_gro_receive' [-Wmissing-prototypes] net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c:319:29: warning: symbol 'tcp4_gro_complete' was not declared. Should it be static? net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c:319:29: warning: no previous prototype for 'tcp4_gro_complete' [-Wmissing-prototypes] CHECK net/ipv6/tcpv6_offload.c net/ipv6/tcpv6_offload.c:16:16: warning: symbol 'tcp6_gro_receive' was not declared. Should it be static? net/ipv6/tcpv6_offload.c:29:29: warning: symbol 'tcp6_gro_complete' was not declared. Should it be static? CC net/ipv6/tcpv6_offload.o net/ipv6/tcpv6_offload.c:16:17: warning: no previous prototype for 'tcp6_gro_receive' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 16 | struct sk_buff *tcp6_gro_receive(struct list_head *head, struct sk_buff *skb) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ net/ipv6/tcpv6_offload.c:29:29: warning: no previous prototype for 'tcp6_gro_complete' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 29 | INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE int tcp6_gro_complete(struct sk_buff *skb, int thoff) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>