kernel/linux.git/mm, branch v6.6.131

mm/damon/sysfs: check contexts->nr before accessing contexts_arr[0]

2026-04-02T11:07:30+00:00

commit 1bfe9fb5ed2667fb075682408b776b5273162615 upstream. Multiple sysfs command paths dereference contexts_arr[0] without first verifying that kdamond->contexts->nr == 1. A user can set nr_contexts to 0 via sysfs while DAMON is running, causing NULL pointer dereferences. In more detail, the issue can be triggered by privileged users like below. First, start DAMON and make contexts directory empty (kdamond->contexts->nr == 0). # damo start # cd /sys/kernel/mm/damon/admin/kdamonds/0 # echo 0 > contexts/nr_contexts Then, each of below commands will cause the NULL pointer dereference. # echo update_schemes_stats > state # echo update_schemes_tried_regions > state # echo update_schemes_tried_bytes > state # echo update_schemes_effective_quotas > state # echo update_tuned_intervals > state Guard all commands (except OFF) at the entry point of damon_sysfs_handle_cmd(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20260321175427.86000-3-sj@kernel.org Fixes: 0ac32b8affb5 ("mm/damon/sysfs: support DAMOS stats") Signed-off-by: Josh Law Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park Cc: [5.18+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm/mempolicy: fix wrong mmap_read_unlock() in migrate_to_node()

2026-03-25T10:06:02+00:00

The backport of commit 091c1dd2d4df ("mm/mempolicy: fix migrate_to_node() assuming there is at least one VMA in a MM") contains an error: migrate_to_node() does not lock the mmap_lock itself, that is handled by the caller instead. So let's drop the wrong mmap_read_unlock(). Fortunately, this path is very hard to hit in practice. Fixes: a13b2b9b0b0b ("mm/mempolicy: fix migrate_to_node() assuming there is at least one VMA in a MM") Reported-by: Li Ying Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/aaZgUNxAyKC2IwuG@casper.infradead.org Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Christoph Lameter Cc: Reviewed-by: Gregory Price Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm/kfence: fix KASAN hardware tag faults during late enablement

2026-03-25T10:05:57+00:00

[ Upstream commit d155aab90fffa00f93cea1f107aef0a3d548b2ff ] When KASAN hardware tags are enabled, re-enabling KFENCE late (via /sys/module/kfence/parameters/sample_interval) causes KASAN faults. This happens because the KFENCE pool and metadata are allocated via the page allocator, which tags the memory, while KFENCE continues to access it using untagged pointers during initialization. Use __GFP_SKIP_KASAN for late KFENCE pool and metadata allocations to ensure the memory remains untagged, consistent with early allocations from memblock. To support this, add __GFP_SKIP_KASAN to the allowlist in __alloc_contig_verify_gfp_mask(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20260220144940.2779209-1-glider@google.com Fixes: 0ce20dd84089 ("mm: add Kernel Electric-Fence infrastructure") Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko Suggested-by: Ernesto Martinez Garcia Cc: Andrey Konovalov Cc: Andrey Ryabinin Cc: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Greg KH Cc: Kees Cook Cc: Marco Elver Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton [ dropped page_alloc.c hunk adding __GFP_SKIP_KASAN ] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm/kfence: disable KFENCE upon KASAN HW tags enablement

2026-03-25T10:05:50+00:00

commit 09833d99db36d74456a4d13eb29c32d56ff8f2b6 upstream. KFENCE does not currently support KASAN hardware tags. As a result, the two features are incompatible when enabled simultaneously. Given that MTE provides deterministic protection and KFENCE is a sampling-based debugging tool, prioritize the stronger hardware protections. Disable KFENCE initialization and free the pre-allocated pool if KASAN hardware tags are detected to ensure the system maintains the security guarantees provided by MTE. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20260213095410.1862978-1-glider@google.com Fixes: 0ce20dd84089 ("mm: add Kernel Electric-Fence infrastructure") Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko Suggested-by: Marco Elver Reviewed-by: Marco Elver Cc: Andrey Konovalov Cc: Andrey Ryabinin Cc: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Ernesto Martinez Garcia Cc: Greg KH Cc: Kees Cook Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm/highmem: fix __kmap_to_page() build error

2026-03-04T12:21:13+00:00

[ Upstream commit 94350fe6cad77b46c3dcb8c96543bef7647efbc0 ] This changes fixes following build error which is a miss from ef6e06b2ef87 ("highmem: fix kmap_to_page() for kmap_local_page() addresses"). mm/highmem.c:184:66: error: 'pteval' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'pte_val'? 184 | idx = arch_kmap_local_map_idx(i, pte_pfn(pteval)); In __kmap_to_page(), pteval is used but does not exist in the function. (akpm: affects xtensa only) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/SJ0PR07MB86317E00EC0C59DA60935FDCD18DA@SJ0PR07MB8631.namprd07.prod.outlook.com Fixes: ef6e06b2ef87 ("highmem: fix kmap_to_page() for kmap_local_page() addresses") Signed-off-by: William Tambe Reviewed-by: Max Filippov Cc: Chris Zankel Cc: Max Filippov Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

mm, page_alloc, thp: prevent reclaim for __GFP_THISNODE THP allocations

2026-03-04T12:21:10+00:00

[ Upstream commit 9c9828d3ead69416d731b1238802af31760c823e ] Since commit cc638f329ef6 ("mm, thp: tweak reclaim/compaction effort of local-only and all-node allocations"), THP page fault allocations have settled on the following scheme (from the commit log): 1. local node only THP allocation with no reclaim, just compaction. 2. for madvised VMA's or when synchronous compaction is enabled always - THP allocation from any node with effort determined by global defrag setting and VMA madvise 3. fallback to base pages on any node Recent customer reports however revealed we have a gap in step 1 above. What we have seen is excessive reclaim due to THP page faults on a NUMA node that's close to its high watermark, while other nodes have plenty of free memory. The problem with step 1 is that it promises no reclaim after the compaction attempt, however reclaim is only avoided for certain compaction outcomes (deferred, or skipped due to insufficient free base pages), and not e.g. when compaction is actually performed but fails (we did see compact_fail vmstat counter increasing). THP page faults can therefore exhibit a zone_reclaim_mode-like behavior, which is not the intention. Thus add a check for __GFP_THISNODE that corresponds to this exact situation and prevents continuing with reclaim/compaction once the initial compaction attempt isn't successful in allocating the page. Note that commit cc638f329ef6 has not introduced this over-reclaim possibility; it appears to exist in some form since commit 2f0799a0ffc0 ("mm, thp: restore node-local hugepage allocations"). Followup commits b39d0ee2632d ("mm, page_alloc: avoid expensive reclaim when compaction may not succeed") and cc638f329ef6 have moved in the right direction, but left the abovementioned gap. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251219-costly-noretry-thisnode-fix-v1-1-e1085a4a0c34@suse.cz Fixes: 2f0799a0ffc0 ("mm, thp: restore node-local hugepage allocations") Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka Acked-by: Michal Hocko Acked-by: Johannes Weiner Acked-by: Pedro Falcato Acked-by: Zi Yan Cc: Brendan Jackman Cc: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" Cc: David Rientjes Cc: Joshua Hahn Cc: Liam Howlett Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

mm/hugetlb: fix excessive IPI broadcasts when unsharing PMD tables using mmu_gather

2026-02-19T15:28:26+00:00

commit 8ce720d5bd91e9dc16db3604aa4b1bf76770a9a1 upstream. As reported, ever since commit 1013af4f585f ("mm/hugetlb: fix huge_pmd_unshare() vs GUP-fast race") we can end up in some situations where we perform so many IPI broadcasts when unsharing hugetlb PMD page tables that it severely regresses some workloads. In particular, when we fork()+exit(), or when we munmap() a large area backed by many shared PMD tables, we perform one IPI broadcast per unshared PMD table. There are two optimizations to be had: (1) When we process (unshare) multiple such PMD tables, such as during exit(), it is sufficient to send a single IPI broadcast (as long as we respect locking rules) instead of one per PMD table. Locking prevents that any of these PMD tables could get reused before we drop the lock. (2) When we are not the last sharer (> 2 users including us), there is no need to send the IPI broadcast. The shared PMD tables cannot become exclusive (fully unshared) before an IPI will be broadcasted by the last sharer. Concurrent GUP-fast could walk into a PMD table just before we unshared it. It could then succeed in grabbing a page from the shared page table even after munmap() etc succeeded (and supressed an IPI). But there is not difference compared to GUP-fast just sleeping for a while after grabbing the page and re-enabling IRQs. Most importantly, GUP-fast will never walk into page tables that are no-longer shared, because the last sharer will issue an IPI broadcast. (if ever required, checking whether the PUD changed in GUP-fast after grabbing the page like we do in the PTE case could handle this) So let's rework PMD sharing TLB flushing + IPI sync to use the mmu_gather infrastructure so we can implement these optimizations and demystify the code at least a bit. Extend the mmu_gather infrastructure to be able to deal with our special hugetlb PMD table sharing implementation. To make initialization of the mmu_gather easier when working on a single VMA (in particular, when dealing with hugetlb), provide tlb_gather_mmu_vma(). We'll consolidate the handling for (full) unsharing of PMD tables in tlb_unshare_pmd_ptdesc() and tlb_flush_unshared_tables(), and track in "struct mmu_gather" whether we had (full) unsharing of PMD tables. Because locking is very special (concurrent unsharing+reuse must be prevented), we disallow deferring flushing to tlb_finish_mmu() and instead require an explicit earlier call to tlb_flush_unshared_tables(). From hugetlb code, we call huge_pmd_unshare_flush() where we make sure that the expected lock protecting us from concurrent unsharing+reuse is still held. Check with a VM_WARN_ON_ONCE() in tlb_finish_mmu() that tlb_flush_unshared_tables() was properly called earlier. Document it all properly. Notes about tlb_remove_table_sync_one() interaction with unsharing: There are two fairly tricky things: (1) tlb_remove_table_sync_one() is a NOP on architectures without CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE. Here, the assumption is that the previous TLB flush would send an IPI to all relevant CPUs. Careful: some architectures like x86 only send IPIs to all relevant CPUs when tlb->freed_tables is set. The relevant architectures should be selecting MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE, but x86 might not do that in stable kernels and it might have been problematic before this patch. Also, the arch flushing behavior (independent of IPIs) is different when tlb->freed_tables is set. Do we have to enlighten them to also take care of tlb->unshared_tables? So far we didn't care, so hopefully we are fine. Of course, we could be setting tlb->freed_tables as well, but that might then unnecessarily flush too much, because the semantics of tlb->freed_tables are a bit fuzzy. This patch changes nothing in this regard. (2) tlb_remove_table_sync_one() is not a NOP on architectures with CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE that actually don't need a sync. Take x86 as an example: in the common case (!pv, !X86_FEATURE_INVLPGB) we still issue IPIs during TLB flushes and don't actually need the second tlb_remove_table_sync_one(). This optimized can be implemented on top of this, by checking e.g., in tlb_remove_table_sync_one() whether we really need IPIs. But as described in (1), it really must honor tlb->freed_tables then to send IPIs to all relevant CPUs. Notes on TLB flushing changes: (1) Flushing for non-shared PMD tables We're converting from flush_hugetlb_tlb_range() to tlb_remove_huge_tlb_entry(). Given that we properly initialize the MMU gather in tlb_gather_mmu_vma() to be hugetlb aware, similar to __unmap_hugepage_range(), that should be fine. (2) Flushing for shared PMD tables We're converting from various things (flush_hugetlb_tlb_range(), tlb_flush_pmd_range(), flush_tlb_range()) to tlb_flush_pmd_range(). tlb_flush_pmd_range() achieves the same that tlb_remove_huge_tlb_entry() would achieve in these scenarios. Note that tlb_remove_huge_tlb_entry() also calls __tlb_remove_tlb_entry(), however that is only implemented on powerpc, which does not support PMD table sharing. Similar to (1), tlb_gather_mmu_vma() should make sure that TLB flushing keeps on working as expected. Further, note that the ptdesc_pmd_pts_dec() in huge_pmd_share() is not a concern, as we are holding the i_mmap_lock the whole time, preventing concurrent unsharing. That ptdesc_pmd_pts_dec() usage will be removed separately as a cleanup later. There are plenty more cleanups to be had, but they have to wait until this is fixed. [david@kernel.org: fix kerneldoc] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/f223dd74-331c-412d-93fc-69e360a5006c@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251223214037.580860-5-david@kernel.org Fixes: 1013af4f585f ("mm/hugetlb: fix huge_pmd_unshare() vs GUP-fast race") Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) Reported-by: "Uschakow, Stanislav" Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/4d3878531c76479d9f8ca9789dc6485d@amazon.de/ Tested-by: Laurence Oberman Acked-by: Harry Yoo Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes Cc: Lance Yang Cc: Liu Shixin Cc: Oscar Salvador Cc: Rik van Riel Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm/hugetlb: fix two comments related to huge_pmd_unshare()

2026-02-19T15:28:26+00:00

commit 3937027caecb4f8251e82dd857ba1d749bb5a428 upstream. Ever since we stopped using the page count to detect shared PMD page tables, these comments are outdated. The only reason we have to flush the TLB early is because once we drop the i_mmap_rwsem, the previously shared page table could get freed (to then get reallocated and used for other purpose). So we really have to flush the TLB before that could happen. So let's simplify the comments a bit. The "If we unshared PMDs, the TLB flush was not recorded in mmu_gather." part introduced as in commit a4a118f2eead ("hugetlbfs: flush TLBs correctly after huge_pmd_unshare") was confusing: sure it is recorded in the mmu_gather, otherwise tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly() wouldn't do anything. So let's drop that comment while at it as well. We'll centralize these comments in a single helper as we rework the code next. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251223214037.580860-3-david@kernel.org Fixes: 59d9094df3d7 ("mm: hugetlb: independent PMD page table shared count") Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel Tested-by: Laurence Oberman Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes Acked-by: Oscar Salvador Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo Cc: Liu Shixin Cc: Lance Yang Cc: "Uschakow, Stanislav" Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm/hugetlb: fix copy_hugetlb_page_range() to use ->pt_share_count

2026-02-19T15:28:26+00:00

commit 14967a9c7d247841b0312c48dcf8cd29e55a4cc8 upstream. commit 59d9094df3d79 ("mm: hugetlb: independent PMD page table shared count") introduced ->pt_share_count dedicated to hugetlb PMD share count tracking, but omitted fixing copy_hugetlb_page_range(), leaving the function relying on page_count() for tracking that no longer works. When lazy page table copy for hugetlb is disabled, that is, revert commit bcd51a3c679d ("hugetlb: lazy page table copies in fork()") fork()'ing with hugetlb PMD sharing quickly lockup - [ 239.446559] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#75 stuck for 27s! [ 239.446611] RIP: 0010:native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x7e/0x2e0 [ 239.446631] Call Trace: [ 239.446633] [ 239.446636] _raw_spin_lock+0x3f/0x60 [ 239.446639] copy_hugetlb_page_range+0x258/0xb50 [ 239.446645] copy_page_range+0x22b/0x2c0 [ 239.446651] dup_mmap+0x3e2/0x770 [ 239.446654] dup_mm.constprop.0+0x5e/0x230 [ 239.446657] copy_process+0xd17/0x1760 [ 239.446660] kernel_clone+0xc0/0x3e0 [ 239.446661] __do_sys_clone+0x65/0xa0 [ 239.446664] do_syscall_64+0x82/0x930 [ 239.446668] ? count_memcg_events+0xd2/0x190 [ 239.446671] ? syscall_trace_enter+0x14e/0x1f0 [ 239.446676] ? syscall_exit_work+0x118/0x150 [ 239.446677] ? arch_exit_to_user_mode_prepare.constprop.0+0x9/0xb0 [ 239.446681] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x30/0x80 [ 239.446684] ? clear_bhb_loop+0x30/0x80 [ 239.446686] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e There are two options to resolve the potential latent issue: 1. warn against PMD sharing in copy_hugetlb_page_range(), 2. fix it. This patch opts for the second option. While at it, simplify the comment, the details are not actually relevant anymore. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250916004520.1604530-1-jane.chu@oracle.com Fixes: 59d9094df3d7 ("mm: hugetlb: independent PMD page table shared count") Signed-off-by: Jane Chu Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo Acked-by: Oscar Salvador Acked-by: David Hildenbrand Cc: Jann Horn Cc: Liu Shixin Cc: Muchun Song Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm/kfence: randomize the freelist on initialization

2026-02-06T15:48:26+00:00

commit 870ff19251bf3910dda7a7245da826924045fedd upstream. Randomize the KFENCE freelist during pool initialization to make allocation patterns less predictable. This is achieved by shuffling the order in which metadata objects are added to the freelist using get_random_u32_below(). Additionally, ensure the error path correctly calculates the address range to be reset if initialization fails, as the address increment logic has been moved to a separate loop. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20260120161510.3289089-1-pimyn@google.com Fixes: 0ce20dd84089 ("mm: add Kernel Electric-Fence infrastructure") Signed-off-by: Pimyn Girgis Reviewed-by: Alexander Potapenko Cc: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Marco Elver Cc: Ernesto Martnez Garca Cc: Greg KH Cc: Kees Cook Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Pimyn Girgis Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman