kernel/linux.git/mm, branch v4.4.95

slub: do not merge cache if slub_debug contains a never-merge flag

2017-10-21T15:09:05+00:00

[ Upstream commit c6e28895a4372992961888ffaadc9efc643b5bfe ] In case CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON=n, find_mergeable() gets debug features from commandline but never checks if there are features from the SLAB_NEVER_MERGE set. As a result selected by slub_debug caches are always mergeable if they have been created without a custom constructor set or without one of the SLAB_* debug features on. This moves the SLAB_NEVER_MERGE check below the flags update from commandline to make sure it won't merge the slab cache if one of the debug features is on. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170101124451.GA4740@lp-laptop-d Signed-off-by: Grygorii Maistrenko Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg Acked-by: David Rientjes Acked-by: Christoph Lameter Cc: Joonsoo Kim Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm: prevent double decrease of nr_reserved_highatomic

2017-09-27T09:00:13+00:00

commit 4855e4a7f29d6d10b0b9c84e189c770c9a94e91e upstream. There is race between page freeing and unreserved highatomic. CPU 0 CPU 1 free_hot_cold_page mt = get_pfnblock_migratetype set_pcppage_migratetype(page, mt) unreserve_highatomic_pageblock spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock) move_freepages_block set_pageblock_migratetype(page) spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock) free_pcppages_bulk __free_one_page(mt) <- mt is stale By above race, a page on CPU 0 could go non-highorderatomic free list since the pageblock's type is changed. By that, unreserve logic of highorderatomic can decrease reserved count on a same pageblock severak times and then it will make mismatch between nr_reserved_highatomic and the number of reserved pageblock. So, this patch verifies whether the pageblock is highatomic or not and decrease the count only if the pageblock is highatomic. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1476259429-18279-3-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Acked-by: Mel Gorman Cc: Joonsoo Kim Cc: Sangseok Lee Cc: Michal Hocko Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Cc: Miles Chen Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Sanitize 'move_pages()' permission checks

2017-08-25T00:02:36+00:00

commit 197e7e521384a23b9e585178f3f11c9fa08274b9 upstream. The 'move_paghes()' system call was introduced long long ago with the same permission checks as for sending a signal (except using CAP_SYS_NICE instead of CAP_SYS_KILL for the overriding capability). That turns out to not be a great choice - while the system call really only moves physical page allocations around (and you need other capabilities to do a lot of it), you can check the return value to map out some the virtual address choices and defeat ASLR of a binary that still shares your uid. So change the access checks to the more common 'ptrace_may_access()' model instead. This tightens the access checks for the uid, and also effectively changes the CAP_SYS_NICE check to CAP_SYS_PTRACE, but it's unlikely that anybody really _uses_ this legacy system call any more (we hav ebetter NUMA placement models these days), so I expect nobody to notice. Famous last words. Reported-by: Otto Ebeling Acked-by: Eric W. Biederman Cc: Willy Tarreau Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm/mempolicy: fix use after free when calling get_mempolicy

2017-08-25T00:02:35+00:00

commit 73223e4e2e3867ebf033a5a8eb2e5df0158ccc99 upstream. I hit a use after free issue when executing trinity and repoduced it with KASAN enabled. The related call trace is as follows. BUG: KASan: use after free in SyS_get_mempolicy+0x3c8/0x960 at addr ffff8801f582d766 Read of size 2 by task syz-executor1/798 INFO: Allocated in mpol_new.part.2+0x74/0x160 age=3 cpu=1 pid=799 __slab_alloc+0x768/0x970 kmem_cache_alloc+0x2e7/0x450 mpol_new.part.2+0x74/0x160 mpol_new+0x66/0x80 SyS_mbind+0x267/0x9f0 system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b INFO: Freed in __mpol_put+0x2b/0x40 age=4 cpu=1 pid=799 __slab_free+0x495/0x8e0 kmem_cache_free+0x2f3/0x4c0 __mpol_put+0x2b/0x40 SyS_mbind+0x383/0x9f0 system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b INFO: Slab 0xffffea0009cb8dc0 objects=23 used=8 fp=0xffff8801f582de40 flags=0x200000000004080 INFO: Object 0xffff8801f582d760 @offset=5984 fp=0xffff8801f582d600 Bytes b4 ffff8801f582d750: ae 01 ff ff 00 00 00 00 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a ........ZZZZZZZZ Object ffff8801f582d760: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk Object ffff8801f582d770: 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b a5 kkkkkkk. Redzone ffff8801f582d778: bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb ........ Padding ffff8801f582d8b8: 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a ZZZZZZZZ Memory state around the buggy address: ffff8801f582d600: fb fb fb fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc ffff8801f582d680: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc >ffff8801f582d700: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fb fb fb fc !shared memory policy is not protected against parallel removal by other thread which is normally protected by the mmap_sem. do_get_mempolicy, however, drops the lock midway while we can still access it later. Early premature up_read is a historical artifact from times when put_user was called in this path see https://lwn.net/Articles/124754/ but that is gone since 8bccd85ffbaf ("[PATCH] Implement sys_* do_* layering in the memory policy layer."). but when we have the the current mempolicy ref count model. The issue was introduced accordingly. Fix the issue by removing the premature release. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1502950924-27521-1-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: zhong jiang Acked-by: Michal Hocko Cc: Minchan Kim Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: David Rientjes Cc: Mel Gorman Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm: ratelimit PFNs busy info message

2017-08-16T20:40:28+00:00

commit 75dddef32514f7aa58930bde6a1263253bc3d4ba upstream. The RDMA subsystem can generate several thousand of these messages per second eventually leading to a kernel crash. Ratelimit these messages to prevent this crash. Doug said: "I've been carrying a version of this for several kernel versions. I don't remember when they started, but we have one (and only one) class of machines: Dell PE R730xd, that generate these errors. When it happens, without a rate limit, we get rcu timeouts and kernel oopses. With the rate limit, we just get a lot of annoying kernel messages but the machine continues on, recovers, and eventually the memory operations all succeed" And: "> Well... why are all these EBUSY's occurring? It sounds inefficient > (at least) but if it is expected, normal and unavoidable then > perhaps we should just remove that message altogether? I don't have an answer to that question. To be honest, I haven't looked real hard. We never had this at all, then it started out of the blue, but only on our Dell 730xd machines (and it hits all of them), but no other classes or brands of machines. And we have our 730xd machines loaded up with different brands and models of cards (for instance one dedicated to mlx4 hardware, one for qib, one for mlx5, an ocrdma/cxgb4 combo, etc), so the fact that it hit all of the machines meant it wasn't tied to any particular brand/model of RDMA hardware. To me, it always smelled of a hardware oddity specific to maybe the CPUs or mainboard chipsets in these machines, so given that I'm not an mm expert anyway, I never chased it down. A few other relevant details: it showed up somewhere around 4.8/4.9 or thereabouts. It never happened before, but the prinkt has been there since the 3.18 days, so possibly the test to trigger this message was changed, or something else in the allocator changed such that the situation started happening on these machines? And, like I said, it is specific to our 730xd machines (but they are all identical, so that could mean it's something like their specific ram configuration is causing the allocator to hit this on these machine but not on other machines in the cluster, I don't want to say it's necessarily the model of chipset or CPU, there are other bits of identicalness between these machines)" Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/499c0f6cc10d6eb829a67f2a4d75b4228a9b356e.1501695897.git.jtoppins@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Toppins Reviewed-by: Doug Ledford Tested-by: Doug Ledford Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Hillf Danton Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm/mempool: avoid KASAN marking mempool poison checks as use-after-free

2017-08-13T02:29:09+00:00

commit 7640131032db9118a78af715ac77ba2debeeb17c upstream. When removing an element from the mempool, mark it as unpoisoned in KASAN before verifying its contents for SLUB/SLAB debugging. Otherwise KASAN will flag the reads checking the element use-after-free writes as use-after-free reads. Signed-off-by: Matthew Dawson Acked-by: Andrey Ryabinin Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andrii Bordunov Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm: don't dereference struct page fields of invalid pages

2017-08-11T16:08:59+00:00

[ Upstream commit f073bdc51771f5a5c7a8d1191bfc3ae371d44de7 ] The VM_BUG_ON() check in move_freepages() checks whether the node id of a page matches the node id of its zone. However, it does this before having checked whether the struct page pointer refers to a valid struct page to begin with. This is guaranteed in most cases, but may not be the case if CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE=y. So reorder the VM_BUG_ON() with the pfn_valid_within() check. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1481706707-6211-2-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel Acked-by: Will Deacon Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Hanjun Guo Cc: Yisheng Xie Cc: Robert Richter Cc: James Morse Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm, mprotect: flush TLB if potentially racing with a parallel reclaim leaving stale TLB entries

2017-08-11T16:08:50+00:00

commit 3ea277194daaeaa84ce75180ec7c7a2075027a68 upstream. Stable note for 4.4: The upstream patch patches madvise(MADV_FREE) but 4.4 does not have support for that feature. The changelog is left as-is but the hunk related to madvise is omitted from the backport. Nadav Amit identified a theoritical race between page reclaim and mprotect due to TLB flushes being batched outside of the PTL being held. He described the race as follows: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- user accesses memory using RW PTE [PTE now cached in TLB] try_to_unmap_one() ==> ptep_get_and_clear() ==> set_tlb_ubc_flush_pending() mprotect(addr, PROT_READ) ==> change_pte_range() ==> [ PTE non-present - no flush ] user writes using cached RW PTE ... try_to_unmap_flush() The same type of race exists for reads when protecting for PROT_NONE and also exists for operations that can leave an old TLB entry behind such as munmap, mremap and madvise. For some operations like mprotect, it's not necessarily a data integrity issue but it is a correctness issue as there is a window where an mprotect that limits access still allows access. For munmap, it's potentially a data integrity issue although the race is massive as an munmap, mmap and return to userspace must all complete between the window when reclaim drops the PTL and flushes the TLB. However, it's theoritically possible so handle this issue by flushing the mm if reclaim is potentially currently batching TLB flushes. Other instances where a flush is required for a present pte should be ok as either the page lock is held preventing parallel reclaim or a page reference count is elevated preventing a parallel free leading to corruption. In the case of page_mkclean there isn't an obvious path that userspace could take advantage of without using the operations that are guarded by this patch. Other users such as gup as a race with reclaim looks just at PTEs. huge page variants should be ok as they don't race with reclaim. mincore only looks at PTEs. userfault also should be ok as if a parallel reclaim takes place, it will either fault the page back in or read some of the data before the flush occurs triggering a fault. Note that a variant of this patch was acked by Andy Lutomirski but this was for the x86 parts on top of his PCID work which didn't make the 4.13 merge window as expected. His ack is dropped from this version and there will be a follow-on patch on top of PCID that will include his ack. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: tweak comments] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix spello] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170717155523.emckq2esjro6hf3z@suse.de Reported-by: Nadav Amit Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman Cc: Andy Lutomirski Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm/page_alloc: Remove kernel address exposure in free_reserved_area()

2017-08-11T16:08:47+00:00

commit adb1fe9ae2ee6ef6bc10f3d5a588020e7664dfa7 upstream. Linus suggested we try to remove some of the low-hanging fruit related to kernel address exposure in dmesg. The only leaks I see on my local system are: Freeing SMP alternatives memory: 32K (ffffffff9e309000 - ffffffff9e311000) Freeing initrd memory: 10588K (ffffa0b736b42000 - ffffa0b737599000) Freeing unused kernel memory: 3592K (ffffffff9df87000 - ffffffff9e309000) Freeing unused kernel memory: 1352K (ffffa0b7288ae000 - ffffa0b728a00000) Freeing unused kernel memory: 632K (ffffa0b728d62000 - ffffa0b728e00000) Linus says: "I suspect we should just remove [the addresses in the 'Freeing' messages]. I'm sure they are useful in theory, but I suspect they were more useful back when the whole "free init memory" was originally done. These days, if we have a use-after-free, I suspect the init-mem situation is the easiest situation by far. Compared to all the dynamic allocations which are much more likely to show it anyway. So having debug output for that case is likely not all that productive." With this patch the freeing messages now look like this: Freeing SMP alternatives memory: 32K Freeing initrd memory: 10588K Freeing unused kernel memory: 3592K Freeing unused kernel memory: 1352K Freeing unused kernel memory: 632K Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Brian Gerst Cc: Denys Vlasenko Cc: H. Peter Anvin Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6836ff90c45b71d38e5d4405aec56fa9e5d1d4b2.1477405374.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Cc: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm: fix overflow check in expand_upwards()

2017-07-21T05:44:58+00:00

commit 37511fb5c91db93d8bd6e3f52f86e5a7ff7cfcdf upstream. JÃ¶rn Engel noticed that the expand_upwards() function might not return -ENOMEM in case the requested address is (unsigned long)-PAGE_SIZE and if the architecture didn't defined TASK_SIZE as multiple of PAGE_SIZE. Affected architectures are arm, frv, m68k, blackfin, h8300 and xtensa which all define TASK_SIZE as 0xffffffff, but since none of those have an upwards-growing stack we currently have no actual issue. Nevertheless let's fix this just in case any of the architectures with an upward-growing stack (currently parisc, metag and partly ia64) define TASK_SIZE similar. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170702192452.GA11868@p100.box Fixes: bd726c90b6b8 ("Allow stack to grow up to address space limit") Signed-off-by: Helge Deller Reported-by: Jörn Engel Cc: Hugh Dickins Cc: Oleg Nesterov Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman