kernel/linux.git/mm/vmstat.c, branch v6.19.11

mm: vmstat: correct the comment above preempt_disable_nested()

2025-11-20T21:43:59+00:00

The comment explaining why these parts use preempt_disable_nested() is in __mod_zone_page_state(), not in __mod_node_page_state(), so we should see __mod_zone_page_state(). Just correct it. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251110084437.46701-1-qi.zheng@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Acked-by: Harry Yoo Cc: Liam Howlett Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

mm: vmstat: output reserved_highatomic and free_highatomic in zoneinfo

2025-11-17T01:28:26+00:00

The nr_free_highatomic is a key factor in calculating watermarks as it affects the free pages count. Adding this metric, along with nr_reserved_highatomic, to /proc/zoneinfo facilitates easier diagnosis memory watermark calculations and memory pressure states. Sample output: cat /proc/zoneinfo ...... pagesets cpu: 0 count: 52069 high: 52675 batch: 63 high_min: 13971 high_max: 62284 vm stats threshold: 10 node_unreclaimable: 0 start_pfn: 4096 reserved_highatomic: 5120 free_highatomic: 2081 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251027141818.283587-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: Liam Howlett Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan Cc: Vlastimil Babka Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

mm/vmstat: fix indentation in fold_diff function

2025-11-17T01:28:15+00:00

Adjust misaligned braces in fold_diff() to improve code readability and maintain consistent coding style. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: add braces, per Vlastimil & Liam] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/aPc4I/8zXCGyiapN@pilot-ThinkCentre-M930t-N000 Signed-off-by: Jing Su Acked-by: David Hildenbrand Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes Reviewed-by: Donet Tom Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Reviewed-by: Dev Jain Cc: Liam Howlett Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

mm/page_alloc/vmstat: simplify refresh_cpu_vm_stats change detection

2025-11-17T01:28:04+00:00

Patch series "mm/page_alloc: Batch callers of free_pcppages_bulk", v5. Motivation & Approach ===================== While testing workloads with high sustained memory pressure on large machines in the Meta fleet (1Tb memory, 316 CPUs), we saw an unexpectedly high number of softlockups. Further investigation showed that the zone lock in free_pcppages_bulk was being held for a long time, and was called to free 2k+ pages over 100 times just during boot. This causes starvation in other processes for the zone lock, which can lead to the system stalling as multiple threads cannot make progress without the locks. We can see these issues manifesting as warnings: [ 4512.591979] rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU [ 4512.604370] rcu: 20-....: (9312 ticks this GP) idle=a654/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=309340/309344 fqs=5426 [ 4512.626401] rcu: hardirqs softirqs csw/system [ 4512.638793] rcu: number: 0 145 0 [ 4512.651177] rcu: cputime: 30 10410 174 ==> 10558(ms) [ 4512.666657] rcu: (t=21077 jiffies g=783665 q=1242213 ncpus=316) While these warnings don't indicate a crash or a kernel panic, they do point to the underlying issue of lock contention. To prevent starvation in both locks, batch the freeing of pages using pcp->batch. Because free_pcppages_bulk is called with the pcp lock and acquires the zone lock, relinquishing and reacquiring the locks are only effective when both of them are broken together (unless the system was built with queued spinlocks). Thus, instead of modifying free_pcppages_bulk to break both locks, batch the freeing from its callers instead. A similar fix has been implemented in the Meta fleet, and we have seen significantly less softlockups. Testing ======= The following are a few synthetic benchmarks, made on three machines. The first is a large machine with 754GiB memory and 316 processors. The second is a relatively smaller machine with 251GiB memory and 176 processors. The third and final is the smallest of the three, which has 62GiB memory and 36 processors. On all machines, I kick off a kernel build with -j$(nproc). Negative delta is better (faster compilation). Large machine (754GiB memory, 316 processors) make -j$(nproc) +------------+---------------+-----------+ | Metric (s) | Variation (%) | Delta(%) | +------------+---------------+-----------+ | real | 0.8070 | - 1.4865 | | user | 0.2823 | + 0.4081 | | sys | 5.0267 | -11.8737 | +------------+---------------+-----------+ Medium machine (251GiB memory, 176 processors) make -j$(nproc) +------------+---------------+----------+ | Metric (s) | Variation (%) | Delta(%) | +------------+---------------+----------+ | real | 0.2806 | +0.0351 | | user | 0.0994 | +0.3170 | | sys | 0.6229 | -0.6277 | +------------+---------------+----------+ Small machine (62GiB memory, 36 processors) make -j$(nproc) +------------+---------------+----------+ | Metric (s) | Variation (%) | Delta(%) | +------------+---------------+----------+ | real | 0.1503 | -2.6585 | | user | 0.0431 | -2.2984 | | sys | 0.1870 | -3.2013 | +------------+---------------+----------+ Here, variation is the coefficient of variation, i.e. standard deviation / mean. Based on these results, it seems like there are varying degrees to how much lock contention this reduces. For the largest and smallest machines that I ran the tests on, it seems like there is quite some significant reduction. There is also some performance increases visible from userspace. Interestingly, the performance gains don't scale with the size of the machine, but rather there seems to be a dip in the gain there is for the medium-sized machine. One possible theory is that because the high watermark depends on both memory and the number of local CPUs, what impacts zone contention the most is not these individual values, but rather the ratio of mem:processors. This patch (of 5): Currently, refresh_cpu_vm_stats returns an int, indicating how many changes were made during its updates. Using this information, callers like vmstat_update can heuristically determine if more work will be done in the future. However, all of refresh_cpu_vm_stats's callers either (a) ignore the result, only caring about performing the updates, or (b) only care about whether changes were made, but not *how many* changes were made. Simplify the code by returning a bool instead to indicate if updates were made. In addition, simplify fold_diff and decay_pcp_high to return a bool for the same reason. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251014145011.3427205-1-joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251014145011.3427205-2-joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Joshua Hahn Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park Cc: Brendan Jackman Cc: Chris Mason Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan Cc: Zi Yan Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

mm: re-enable kswapd when memory pressure subsides or demotion is toggled

2025-09-21T21:22:29+00:00

If kswapd fails to reclaim pages from a node MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES in a row, kswapd on that node gets disabled. That is, the system won't wakeup kswapd for that node until page reclamation is observed at least once. That reclamation is mostly done by direct reclaim, which in turn enables kswapd back. However, on systems with CXL memory nodes, workloads with high anon page usage can disable kswapd indefinitely, without triggering direct reclaim. This can be reproduced with following steps: numa node 0 (32GB memory, 48 CPUs) numa node 2~5 (512GB CXL memory, 128GB each) (numa node 1 is disabled) swap space 8GB 1) Set /sys/kernel/mm/demotion_enabled to 0. 2) Set /proc/sys/kernel/numa_balancing to 0. 3) Run a process that allocates and random accesses 500GB of anon pages. 4) Let the process exit normally. During 3), free memory on node 0 gets lower than low watermark, and kswapd runs and depletes swap space. Then, kswapd fails consecutively and gets disabled. Allocation afterwards happens on CXL memory, so node 0 never gains more memory pressure to trigger direct reclaim. After 4), kswapd on node 0 remains disabled, and tasks running on that node are unable to swap. If you turn on NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING and demotion now, it won't work properly since kswapd is disabled. To mitigate this problem, reset kswapd_failures to 0 on following conditions: a) ZONE_BELOW_HIGH bit of a zone in hopeless node with a fallback memory node gets cleared. b) demotion_enabled is changed from false to true. Rationale for a): ZONE_BELOW_HIGH bit being cleared might be a sign that the node may be reclaimable afterwards. This won't help much if the memory-hungry process keeps running without freeing anything, but at least the node will go back to reclaimable state when the process exits. Rationale for b): When demotion_enabled is false, kswapd can only reclaim anon pages by swapping them out to swap space. If demotion_enabled is turned on, kswapd can demote anon pages to another node for reclaiming. So, the original failure count for determining reclaimability is no longer valid. Since kswapd_failures resets may be missed by ++ operation, it is changed from int to atomic_t. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: tweak whitespace] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/aL6qGi69jWXfPc4D@pcw-MS-7D22 Signed-off-by: Chanwon Park Cc: Brendan Jackman Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Qi Zheng Cc: Shakeel Butt Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Zi Yan Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

mm: add vmstat for kernel_file pages

2025-09-13T23:55:20+00:00

Kernel file pages are tricky to track because they are indistinguishable from files whose usage is accounted to the root cgroup. To maintain good accounting, introduce a vmstat counter tracking kernel file pages. Confirmed that these work as expected at a high level by mounting a btrfs using AS_KERNEL_FILE for metadata pages, and seeing the counter rise with fs usage then go back to a minimal level after drop_caches and finally down to 0 after unmounting the fs. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/08ff633e3a005ed5f7691bfd9f58a5df8e474339.1755812945.git.boris@bur.io Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov Suggested-by: Shakeel Butt Acked-by: Shakeel Butt Tested-by: syzbot@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Muchun Song Cc: Qu Wenruo Cc: Roman Gushchin Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

mm: memory-tiering: fix PGPROMOTE_CANDIDATE counting

2025-09-13T23:54:42+00:00

Goto-san reported confusing pgpromote statistics where the pgpromote_success count significantly exceeded pgpromote_candidate. On a system with three nodes (nodes 0-1: DRAM 4GB, node 2: NVDIMM 4GB): # Enable demotion only echo 1 > /sys/kernel/mm/numa/demotion_enabled numactl -m 0-1 memhog -r200 3500M >/dev/null & pid=$! sleep 2 numactl memhog -r100 2500M >/dev/null & sleep 10 kill -9 $pid # terminate the 1st memhog # Enable promotion echo 2 > /proc/sys/kernel/numa_balancing After a few seconds, we observeed `pgpromote_candidate < pgpromote_success` $ grep -e pgpromote /proc/vmstat pgpromote_success 2579 pgpromote_candidate 0 In this scenario, after terminating the first memhog, the conditions for pgdat_free_space_enough() are quickly met, and triggers promotion. However, these migrated pages are only counted for in PGPROMOTE_SUCCESS, not in PGPROMOTE_CANDIDATE. To solve these confusing statistics, introduce PGPROMOTE_CANDIDATE_NRL to count the missed promotion pages. And also, not counting these pages into PGPROMOTE_CANDIDATE is to avoid changing the existing algorithm or performance of the promotion rate limit. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250901090122.124262-1-ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250729035101.1601407-1-ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com Fixes: c6833e10008f ("memory tiering: rate limit NUMA migration throughput") Co-developed-by: Li Zhijian Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian Signed-off-by: Ruan Shiyang Reported-by: Yasunori Gotou (Fujitsu) Suggested-by: Huang Ying Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Reviewed-by: Huang Ying Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Juri Lelli Cc: Vincent Guittot Cc: Dietmar Eggemann Cc: Steven Rostedt Cc: Ben Segall Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Valentin Schneider Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

mm, vmstat: remove the NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP node_stat_item counter

2025-07-20T01:59:47+00:00

The only user of the counter (FUSE) was removed in commit 0c58a97f919c ("fuse: remove tmp folio for writebacks and internal rb tree") so follow the established pattern of removing the counter and hardcoding 0 in meminfo output, as done recently with NR_BOUNCE. Update documentation for procfs, including for the value for Bounce that was missed when removing its counter. Also remove the mention of NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP implications from a comment in wb_position_ratio(). The rest of the comment there about fuse setting bdi->max_ratio to 1% is still correct. [vbabka@suse.cz: v2] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/5a848e15-6a57-4ecb-a015-d4f358b8a5d3@suse.cz Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250625-nr_writeback_removal-v1-1-7f2a0df70faa@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Brendan Jackman Cc: Danilo Krummrich Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Jan Kara Cc: Jeff Layton Cc: Jeffle Xu Cc: Jens Axboe Cc: Joanne Koong Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Kirill A. Shuemov Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) Cc: Maxim Patlasov Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Miklos Szeredi Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan Cc: Tejun Heo Cc: Zach O'Keefe Cc: Zi Yan Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

mm/vmstat: utilize designated initializers for the vmstat_text array

2025-07-20T01:59:46+00:00

The vmstat_text array defines labels for counters displayed in /proc/vmstat. The current definition of the array implies a specific order of the counters in their enums, making it fragile. To make it clear which counter the label is for, use designated initializers. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250603084556.113975-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Acked-by: Michal Hocko Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: Liam Howlett Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

mm: strictly check vmstat_text array size

2025-07-20T01:59:46+00:00

/proc/vmstat displays counters from various sources. It is easy to forget to add or remove a label when a new counter is added or removed. There is a BUILD_BUG_ON() function that catches missing labels. However, for some reason, it ignores extra labels. Let's make the check strict. This would help to catch issues when a counter is removed. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250529110541.2960330-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka Acked-by: Michal Hocko Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov Cc: Kirill A. Shuemov Cc: Liam Howlett Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton