kernel/linux.git/mm/memblock.c, branch v6.1.168

x86/numa: Fix the address overlap check in numa_fill_memblks()

2024-03-01T12:26:36+00:00

[ Upstream commit 9b99c17f7510bed2adbe17751fb8abddba5620bc ] numa_fill_memblks() fills in the gaps in numa_meminfo memblks over a physical address range. To do so, it first creates a list of existing memblks that overlap that address range. The issue is that it is off by one when comparing to the end of the address range, so memblks that do not overlap are selected. The impact of selecting a memblk that does not actually overlap is that an existing memblk may be filled when the expected action is to do nothing and return NUMA_NO_MEMBLK to the caller. The caller can then add a new NUMA node and memblk. Replace the broken open-coded search for address overlap with the memblock helper memblock_addrs_overlap(). Update the kernel doc and in code comments. Suggested by: "Huang, Ying" Fixes: 8f012db27c95 ("x86/numa: Introduce numa_fill_memblks()") Signed-off-by: Alison Schofield Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) Acked-by: Dave Hansen Reviewed-by: Dan Williams Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/10a3e6109c34c21a8dd4c513cf63df63481a2b07.1705085543.git.alison.schofield@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Revert "mm: Always release pages to the buddy allocator in memblock_free_late()."

2023-02-22T11:59:50+00:00

commit 647037adcad00f2bab8828d3d41cd0553d41f3bd upstream. This reverts commit 115d9d77bb0f9152c60b6e8646369fa7f6167593. The pages being freed by memblock_free_late() have already been initialized, but if they are in the deferred init range, __free_one_page() might access nearby uninitialized pages when trying to coalesce buddies. This can, for example, trigger this BUG: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffe964c02580c8 RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid+0x3f/0x70 __free_one_page+0x139/0x410 __free_pages_ok+0x21d/0x450 memblock_free_late+0x8c/0xb9 efi_free_boot_services+0x16b/0x25c efi_enter_virtual_mode+0x403/0x446 start_kernel+0x678/0x714 secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xd2/0xdb A proper fix will be more involved so revert this change for the time being. Fixes: 115d9d77bb0f ("mm: Always release pages to the buddy allocator in memblock_free_late().") Signed-off-by: Aaron Thompson Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230207082151.1303-1-dev@aaront.org Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm: Always release pages to the buddy allocator in memblock_free_late().

2023-01-18T10:58:20+00:00

commit 115d9d77bb0f9152c60b6e8646369fa7f6167593 upstream. If CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT is enabled, memblock_free_pages() only releases pages to the buddy allocator if they are not in the deferred range. This is correct for free pages (as defined by for_each_free_mem_pfn_range_in_zone()) because free pages in the deferred range will be initialized and released as part of the deferred init process. memblock_free_pages() is called by memblock_free_late(), which is used to free reserved ranges after memblock_free_all() has run. All pages in reserved ranges have been initialized at that point, and accordingly, those pages are not touched by the deferred init process. This means that currently, if the pages that memblock_free_late() intends to release are in the deferred range, they will never be released to the buddy allocator. They will forever be reserved. In addition, memblock_free_pages() calls kmsan_memblock_free_pages(), which is also correct for free pages but is not correct for reserved pages. KMSAN metadata for reserved pages is initialized by kmsan_init_shadow(), which runs shortly before memblock_free_all(). For both of these reasons, memblock_free_pages() should only be called for free pages, and memblock_free_late() should call __free_pages_core() directly instead. One case where this issue can occur in the wild is EFI boot on x86_64. The x86 EFI code reserves all EFI boot services memory ranges via memblock_reserve() and frees them later via memblock_free_late() (efi_reserve_boot_services() and efi_free_boot_services(), respectively). If any of those ranges happens to fall within the deferred init range, the pages will not be released and that memory will be unavailable. For example, on an Amazon EC2 t3.micro VM (1 GB) booting via EFI: v6.2-rc2: # grep -E 'Node|spanned|present|managed' /proc/zoneinfo Node 0, zone DMA spanned 4095 present 3999 managed 3840 Node 0, zone DMA32 spanned 246652 present 245868 managed 178867 v6.2-rc2 + patch: # grep -E 'Node|spanned|present|managed' /proc/zoneinfo Node 0, zone DMA spanned 4095 present 3999 managed 3840 Node 0, zone DMA32 spanned 246652 present 245868 managed 222816 # +43,949 pages Fixes: 3a80a7fa7989 ("mm: meminit: initialise a subset of struct pages if CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT is set") Signed-off-by: Aaron Thompson Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/01010185892de53e-e379acfb-7044-4b24-b30a-e2657c1ba989-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm: add pageblock_align() macro

2022-10-03T21:03:04+00:00

Add pageblock_align() macro and use it to simplify code. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220907060844.126891-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang Acked-by: Mike Rapoport Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand Cc: Oscar Salvador Cc: Vlastimil Babka Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

mm: reuse pageblock_start/end_pfn() macro

2022-10-03T21:03:03+00:00

Move pageblock_start_pfn/pageblock_end_pfn() into pageblock-flags.h, then they could be used somewhere else, not only in compaction, also use ALIGN_DOWN() instead of round_down() to be pair with ALIGN(), which should be same for pageblock usage. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220907060844.126891-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang Acked-by: Mike Rapoport Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand Cc: Oscar Salvador Cc: Vlastimil Babka Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

Merge tag 'memblock-v5.20-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/memblock

2022-08-09T16:48:30+00:00

Pull memblock updates from Mike Rapoport: - An optimization in memblock_add_range() to reduce array traversals - Improvements to the memblock test suite * tag 'memblock-v5.20-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/memblock: memblock test: Modify the obsolete description in README memblock tests: fix compilation errors memblock tests: change build options to run-time options memblock tests: remove completed TODO items memblock tests: set memblock_debug to enable memblock_dbg() messages memblock tests: add verbose output to memblock tests memblock tests: Makefile: add arguments to control verbosity memblock: avoid some repeat when add new range

Merge tag 'mm-stable-2022-08-03' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

2022-08-05T23:32:45+00:00

Pull MM updates from Andrew Morton: "Most of the MM queue. A few things are still pending. Liam's maple tree rework didn't make it. This has resulted in a few other minor patch series being held over for next time. Multi-gen LRU still isn't merged as we were waiting for mapletree to stabilize. The current plan is to merge MGLRU into -mm soon and to later reintroduce mapletree, with a view to hopefully getting both into 6.1-rc1. Summary: - The usual batches of cleanups from Baoquan He, Muchun Song, Miaohe Lin, Yang Shi, Anshuman Khandual and Mike Rapoport - Some kmemleak fixes from Patrick Wang and Waiman Long - DAMON updates from SeongJae Park - memcg debug/visibility work from Roman Gushchin - vmalloc speedup from Uladzislau Rezki - more folio conversion work from Matthew Wilcox - enhancements for coherent device memory mapping from Alex Sierra - addition of shared pages tracking and CoW support for fsdax, from Shiyang Ruan - hugetlb optimizations from Mike Kravetz - Mel Gorman has contributed some pagealloc changes to improve latency and realtime behaviour. - mprotect soft-dirty checking has been improved by Peter Xu - Many other singleton patches all over the place" [ XFS merge from hell as per Darrick Wong in https://lore.kernel.org/all/YshKnxb4VwXycPO8@magnolia/ ] * tag 'mm-stable-2022-08-03' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm: (282 commits) tools/testing/selftests/vm/hmm-tests.c: fix build mm: Kconfig: fix typo mm: memory-failure: convert to pr_fmt() mm: use is_zone_movable_page() helper hugetlbfs: fix inaccurate comment in hugetlbfs_statfs() hugetlbfs: cleanup some comments in inode.c hugetlbfs: remove unneeded header file hugetlbfs: remove unneeded hugetlbfs_ops forward declaration hugetlbfs: use helper macro SZ_1{K,M} mm: cleanup is_highmem() mm/hmm: add a test for cross device private faults selftests: add soft-dirty into run_vmtests.sh selftests: soft-dirty: add test for mprotect mm/mprotect: fix soft-dirty check in can_change_pte_writable() mm: memcontrol: fix potential oom_lock recursion deadlock mm/gup.c: fix formatting in check_and_migrate_movable_page() xfs: fail dax mount if reflink is enabled on a partition mm/memcontrol.c: remove the redundant updating of stats_flush_threshold userfaultfd: don't fail on unrecognized features hugetlb_cgroup: fix wrong hugetlb cgroup numa stat ...

memblock,arm64: expand the static memblock memory table

2022-07-30T01:07:15+00:00

In a system(Huawei Ascend ARM64 SoC) using HBM, a multi-bit ECC error occurs, and the BIOS will mark the corresponding area (for example, 2 MB) as unusable. When the system restarts next time, these areas are not reported or reported as EFI_UNUSABLE_MEMORY. Both cases lead to an increase in the number of memblocks, whereas EFI_UNUSABLE_MEMORY leads to a larger number of memblocks. For example, if the EFI_UNUSABLE_MEMORY type is reported: ... memory[0x92] [0x0000200834a00000-0x0000200835bfffff], 0x0000000001200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x0 memory[0x93] [0x0000200835c00000-0x0000200835dfffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x4 memory[0x94] [0x0000200835e00000-0x00002008367fffff], 0x0000000000a00000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x0 memory[0x95] [0x0000200836800000-0x00002008369fffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x4 memory[0x96] [0x0000200836a00000-0x0000200837bfffff], 0x0000000001200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x0 memory[0x97] [0x0000200837c00000-0x0000200837dfffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x4 memory[0x98] [0x0000200837e00000-0x000020087fffffff], 0x0000000048200000 bytes on node 7 flags: 0x0 memory[0x99] [0x0000200880000000-0x0000200bcfffffff], 0x0000000350000000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x0 memory[0x9a] [0x0000200bd0000000-0x0000200bd01fffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x4 memory[0x9b] [0x0000200bd0200000-0x0000200bd07fffff], 0x0000000000600000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x0 memory[0x9c] [0x0000200bd0800000-0x0000200bd09fffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x4 memory[0x9d] [0x0000200bd0a00000-0x0000200fcfffffff], 0x00000003ff600000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x0 memory[0x9e] [0x0000200fd0000000-0x0000200fd01fffff], 0x0000000000200000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x4 memory[0x9f] [0x0000200fd0200000-0x0000200fffffffff], 0x000000002fe00000 bytes on node 6 flags: 0x0 ... The EFI memory map is parsed to construct the memblock arrays before the memblock arrays can be resized. As the result, memory regions beyond INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS are lost. Add a new macro INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGIONS to replace INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGTIONS to define the size of the static memblock.memory array. Allow overriding memblock.memory array size with architecture defined INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGIONS and make arm64 to set INIT_MEMBLOCK_MEMORY_REGIONS to 1024 when CONFIG_EFI is enabled. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220615102742.96450-1-zhouguanghui1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Zhou Guanghui Acked-by: Mike Rapoport Tested-by: Darren Hart Acked-by: Will Deacon [arm64] Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual Cc: Xu Qiang Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

memblock: avoid some repeat when add new range

2022-06-30T08:55:00+00:00

The worst case is that the new memory range overlaps all existing regions, which requires type->cnt + 1 empty struct memblock_region slots in the type->regions array. So if type->cnt + 1 + type->cnt is less than type->max, we can insert regions directly rather than calculate the needed amount before the insertion. And becase of merge operation in the end of function, tpye->cnt will increase slowly for many cases. This change allows to avoid unnecessary repeat of memblock ranges traversal for many cases when adding new memory range. Signed-off-by: Jinyu Tang [rppt: massaged comment and changelog text] Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport

mm: kmemleak: remove kmemleak_not_leak_phys() and the min_count argument to kmemleak_alloc_phys()

2022-06-17T02:48:30+00:00

Patch series "mm: kmemleak: store objects allocated with physical address separately and check when scan", v4. The kmemleak_*_phys() interface uses "min_low_pfn" and "max_low_pfn" to check address. But on some architectures, kmemleak_*_phys() is called before those two variables initialized. The following steps will be taken: 1) Add OBJECT_PHYS flag and rbtree for the objects allocated with physical address 2) Store physical address in objects if allocated with OBJECT_PHYS 3) Check the boundary when scan instead of in kmemleak_*_phys() This patch set will solve: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220527032504.30341-1-yee.lee@mediatek.com https://lore.kernel.org/r/9dd08bb5-f39e-53d8-f88d-bec598a08c93@gmail.com v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220609124950.1694394-1-patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220603035415.1243913-1-patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220531150823.1004101-1-patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com This patch (of 4): Remove the unused kmemleak_not_leak_phys() function. And remove the min_count argument to kmemleak_alloc_phys() function, assume it's 0. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220611035551.1823303-1-patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220611035551.1823303-2-patrick.wang.shcn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Patrick Wang Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas Cc: Yee Lee Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton