kernel/linux.git/lib/test_firmware.c, branch v6.12.80

KUnit: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macros for lib/test_*.ko

2024-06-25T05:25:11+00:00

make allmodconfig && make W=1 C=1 reports for lib/test_*.ko: WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/test_hexdump.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/test_dhry.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/test_firmware.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/test_sysctl.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/test_hash.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/test_ida.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/test_list_sort.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/test_min_heap.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/test_module.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/test_sort.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/test_static_keys.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/test_static_key_base.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/test_memcat_p.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/test_blackhole_dev.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/test_meminit.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/test_free_pages.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/test_kprobes.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/test_ref_tracker.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in lib/test_bits.o Add the missing invocations of the MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macro. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240619-md-lib-test-v2-1-301e30eeba1e@quicinc.com Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson Reviewed-by: Kees Cook Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) Cc: Anil S Keshavamurthy Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

firmware_loader: Expand Firmware upload error codes with firmware invalid error

2023-11-25T02:09:19+00:00

No error code are available to signal an invalid firmware content. Drivers that can check the firmware content validity can not return this specific failure to the user-space Expand the firmware error code with an additional code: - "firmware invalid" code which can be used when the provided firmware is invalid Sync lib/test_firmware.c file accordingly. Acked-by: Luis Chamberlain Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Kory Maincent Reviewed-by: Simon Horman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231122-feature_firmware_error_code-v3-1-04ec753afb71@bootlin.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

test_firmware: return ENOMEM instead of ENOSPC on failed memory allocation

2023-06-15T11:42:18+00:00

In a couple of situations like name = kstrndup(buf, count, GFP_KERNEL); if (!name) return -ENOSPC; the error is not actually "No space left on device", but "Out of memory". It is semantically correct to return -ENOMEM in all failed kstrndup() and kzalloc() cases in this driver, as it is not a problem with disk space, but with kernel memory allocator failing allocation. The semantically correct should be: name = kstrndup(buf, count, GFP_KERNEL); if (!name) return -ENOMEM; Cc: Dan Carpenter Cc: Takashi Iwai Cc: Kees Cook Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: Scott Branden Cc: Hans de Goede Cc: Brian Norris Fixes: c92316bf8e948 ("test_firmware: add batched firmware tests") Fixes: 0a8adf584759c ("test: add firmware_class loader test") Fixes: 548193cba2a7d ("test_firmware: add support for firmware_request_platform") Fixes: eb910947c82f9 ("test: firmware_class: add asynchronous request trigger") Fixes: 061132d2b9c95 ("test_firmware: add test custom fallback trigger") Fixes: 7feebfa487b92 ("test_firmware: add support for request_firmware_into_buf") Signed-off-by: Mirsad Goran Todorovac Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter Message-ID: <20230606070808.9300-1-mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg.hr> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

test_firmware: fix the memory leak of the allocated firmware buffer

2023-05-31T19:31:07+00:00

The following kernel memory leak was noticed after running tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_run_tests.sh: [root@pc-mtodorov firmware]# cat /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak . . . unreferenced object 0xffff955389bc3400 (size 1024): comm "test_firmware-0", pid 5451, jiffies 4294944822 (age 65.652s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 47 48 34 35 36 37 0a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 GH4567.......... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] slab_post_alloc_hook+0x8c/0x3c0 [] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x184/0x240 [] kmalloc_trace+0x2e/0xc0 [] test_fw_run_batch_request+0x9d/0x180 [] kthread+0x10b/0x140 [] ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50 unreferenced object 0xffff9553c334b400 (size 1024): comm "test_firmware-1", pid 5452, jiffies 4294944822 (age 65.652s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 47 48 34 35 36 37 0a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 GH4567.......... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] slab_post_alloc_hook+0x8c/0x3c0 [] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x184/0x240 [] kmalloc_trace+0x2e/0xc0 [] test_fw_run_batch_request+0x9d/0x180 [] kthread+0x10b/0x140 [] ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50 unreferenced object 0xffff9553c334f000 (size 1024): comm "test_firmware-2", pid 5453, jiffies 4294944822 (age 65.652s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 47 48 34 35 36 37 0a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 GH4567.......... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] slab_post_alloc_hook+0x8c/0x3c0 [] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x184/0x240 [] kmalloc_trace+0x2e/0xc0 [] test_fw_run_batch_request+0x9d/0x180 [] kthread+0x10b/0x140 [] ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50 unreferenced object 0xffff9553c3348400 (size 1024): comm "test_firmware-3", pid 5454, jiffies 4294944822 (age 65.652s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 47 48 34 35 36 37 0a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 GH4567.......... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] slab_post_alloc_hook+0x8c/0x3c0 [] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x184/0x240 [] kmalloc_trace+0x2e/0xc0 [] test_fw_run_batch_request+0x9d/0x180 [] kthread+0x10b/0x140 [] ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50 [root@pc-mtodorov firmware]# Note that the size 1024 corresponds to the size of the test firmware buffer. The actual number of the buffers leaked is around 70-110, depending on the test run. The cause of the leak is the following: request_partial_firmware_into_buf() and request_firmware_into_buf() provided firmware buffer isn't released on release_firmware(), we have allocated it and we are responsible for deallocating it manually. This is introduced in a number of context where previously only release_firmware() was called, which was insufficient. Reported-by: Mirsad Goran Todorovac Fixes: 7feebfa487b92 ("test_firmware: add support for request_firmware_into_buf") Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Dan Carpenter Cc: Takashi Iwai Cc: Luis Chamberlain Cc: Russ Weight Cc: Tianfei zhang Cc: Christophe JAILLET Cc: Zhengchao Shao Cc: Colin Ian King Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Kees Cook Cc: Scott Branden Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.4 Signed-off-by: Mirsad Goran Todorovac Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230509084746.48259-3-mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg.hr Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

test_firmware: fix a memory leak with reqs buffer

2023-05-31T19:31:07+00:00

Dan Carpenter spotted that test_fw_config->reqs will be leaked if trigger_batched_requests_store() is called two or more times. The same appears with trigger_batched_requests_async_store(). This bug wasn't trigger by the tests, but observed by Dan's visual inspection of the code. The recommended workaround was to return -EBUSY if test_fw_config->reqs is already allocated. Fixes: 7feebfa487b92 ("test_firmware: add support for request_firmware_into_buf") Cc: Luis Chamberlain Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Russ Weight Cc: Tianfei Zhang Cc: Shuah Khan Cc: Colin Ian King Cc: Randy Dunlap Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.4 Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter Suggested-by: Takashi Iwai Signed-off-by: Mirsad Goran Todorovac Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter Acked-by: Luis Chamberlain Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230509084746.48259-2-mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg.hr Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

test_firmware: prevent race conditions by a correct implementation of locking

2023-05-31T19:31:07+00:00

Dan Carpenter spotted a race condition in a couple of situations like these in the test_firmware driver: static int test_dev_config_update_u8(const char *buf, size_t size, u8 *cfg) { u8 val; int ret; ret = kstrtou8(buf, 10, &val); if (ret) return ret; mutex_lock(&test_fw_mutex); *(u8 *)cfg = val; mutex_unlock(&test_fw_mutex); /* Always return full write size even if we didn't consume all */ return size; } static ssize_t config_num_requests_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t count) { int rc; mutex_lock(&test_fw_mutex); if (test_fw_config->reqs) { pr_err("Must call release_all_firmware prior to changing config\n"); rc = -EINVAL; mutex_unlock(&test_fw_mutex); goto out; } mutex_unlock(&test_fw_mutex); rc = test_dev_config_update_u8(buf, count, &test_fw_config->num_requests); out: return rc; } static ssize_t config_read_fw_idx_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t count) { return test_dev_config_update_u8(buf, count, &test_fw_config->read_fw_idx); } The function test_dev_config_update_u8() is called from both the locked and the unlocked context, function config_num_requests_store() and config_read_fw_idx_store() which can both be called asynchronously as they are driver's methods, while test_dev_config_update_u8() and siblings change their argument pointed to by u8 *cfg or similar pointer. To avoid deadlock on test_fw_mutex, the lock is dropped before calling test_dev_config_update_u8() and re-acquired within test_dev_config_update_u8() itself, but alas this creates a race condition. Having two locks wouldn't assure a race-proof mutual exclusion. This situation is best avoided by the introduction of a new, unlocked function __test_dev_config_update_u8() which can be called from the locked context and reducing test_dev_config_update_u8() to: static int test_dev_config_update_u8(const char *buf, size_t size, u8 *cfg) { int ret; mutex_lock(&test_fw_mutex); ret = __test_dev_config_update_u8(buf, size, cfg); mutex_unlock(&test_fw_mutex); return ret; } doing the locking and calling the unlocked primitive, which enables both locked and unlocked versions without duplication of code. The similar approach was applied to all functions called from the locked and the unlocked context, which safely mitigates both deadlocks and race conditions in the driver. __test_dev_config_update_bool(), __test_dev_config_update_u8() and __test_dev_config_update_size_t() unlocked versions of the functions were introduced to be called from the locked contexts as a workaround without releasing the main driver's lock and thereof causing a race condition. The test_dev_config_update_bool(), test_dev_config_update_u8() and test_dev_config_update_size_t() locked versions of the functions are being called from driver methods without the unnecessary multiplying of the locking and unlocking code for each method, and complicating the code with saving of the return value across lock. Fixes: 7feebfa487b92 ("test_firmware: add support for request_firmware_into_buf") Cc: Luis Chamberlain Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Russ Weight Cc: Takashi Iwai Cc: Tianfei Zhang Cc: Shuah Khan Cc: Colin Ian King Cc: Randy Dunlap Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.4 Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: Mirsad Goran Todorovac Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230509084746.48259-1-mirsad.todorovac@alu.unizg.hr Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

test_firmware: Use kstrtobool() instead of strtobool()

2023-01-20T13:09:47+00:00

strtobool() is the same as kstrtobool(). However, the latter is more used within the kernel. In order to remove strtobool() and slightly simplify kstrtox.h, switch to the other function name. While at it, include the corresponding header file () Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET Acked-by: Luis Chamberlain Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/34f04735d20e0138695dd4070651bd860a36b81c.1673688120.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

test_firmware: use kernel-doc struct notation

2023-01-20T13:09:41+00:00

Add "struct" to the kernel-doc notation to prevent a warning: lib/test_firmware.c:98: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'struct test_config ' Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap Cc: Luis Chamberlain Cc: Russ Weight Cc: Kees Cook Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Acked-by: Luis Chamberlain Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102211554.25629-1-rdunlap@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

test_firmware: fix memory leak in test_firmware_init()

2022-11-23T18:49:13+00:00

When misc_register() failed in test_firmware_init(), the memory pointed by test_fw_config->name is not released. The memory leak information is as follows: unreferenced object 0xffff88810a34cb00 (size 32): comm "insmod", pid 7952, jiffies 4294948236 (age 49.060s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 74 65 73 74 2d 66 69 72 6d 77 61 72 65 2e 62 69 test-firmware.bi 6e 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 n............... backtrace: [] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x4b/0xc0 [] kstrndup+0x46/0xc0 [] __test_firmware_config_init+0x29/0x380 [test_firmware] [] 0xffffffffa040f068 [] do_one_initcall+0x141/0x780 [] do_init_module+0x1c3/0x630 [] load_module+0x623e/0x76a0 [] __do_sys_finit_module+0x181/0x240 [] do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 [] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd Fixes: c92316bf8e94 ("test_firmware: add batched firmware tests") Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao Acked-by: Luis Chamberlain Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221119035721.18268-1-shaozhengchao@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

test_firmware: Fix spelling mistake "EMTPY" -> "EMPTY"

2022-11-10T17:51:49+00:00

There are spelling mistakes in config show text. Fix these. Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King Reviewed-by: Russ Weight Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220928211637.62529-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman