kernel/linux.git/include, branch v4.9.319

x86/speculation/mmio: Add sysfs reporting for Processor MMIO Stale Data

2022-06-16T11:00:52+00:00

commit 8d50cdf8b8341770bc6367bce40c0c1bb0e1d5b3 upstream Add the sysfs reporting file for Processor MMIO Stale Data vulnerability. It exposes the vulnerability and mitigation state similar to the existing files for the other hardware vulnerabilities. Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpu/speculation: Add prototype for cpu_show_srbds()

2022-06-16T11:00:50+00:00

commit 2accfa69050c2a0d6fc6106f609208b3e9622b26 upstream. 0-day is not happy that there is no prototype for cpu_show_srbds(): drivers/base/cpu.c:565:16: error: no previous prototype for 'cpu_show_srbds' Fixes: 7e5b3c267d25 ("x86/speculation: Add Special Register Buffer Data Sampling (SRBDS) mitigation") Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200617141410.93338-1-linux@roeck-us.net Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Use chip_ready() for write on S29GL064N

2022-06-14T14:52:41+00:00

commit 0a8e98305f63deaf0a799d5cf5532cc83af035d1 upstream. Since commit dfeae1073583("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change write buffer to check correct value") buffered writes fail on S29GL064N. This is because, on S29GL064N, reads return 0xFF at the end of DQ polling for write completion, where as, chip_good() check expects actual data written to the last location to be returned post DQ polling completion. Fix is to revert to using chip_good() for S29GL064N which only checks for DQ lines to settle down to determine write completion. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b687c259-6413-26c9-d4c9-b3afa69ea124@pengutronix.de/ Fixes: dfeae1073583("mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Change write buffer to check correct value") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Tokunori Ikegami Acked-by: Vignesh Raghavendra Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20220323170458.5608-3-ikegami.t@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

nodemask: Fix return values to be unsigned

2022-06-14T14:52:40+00:00

[ Upstream commit 0dfe54071d7c828a02917b595456bfde1afdddc9 ] The nodemask routines had mixed return values that provided potentially signed return values that could never happen. This was leading to the compiler getting confusing about the range of possible return values (it was thinking things could be negative where they could not be). Fix all the nodemask routines that should be returning unsigned (or bool) values. Silences: mm/swapfile.c: In function ‘setup_swap_info’: mm/swapfile.c:2291:47: error: array subscript -1 is below array bounds of ‘struct plist_node[]’ [-Werror=array-bounds] 2291 | p->avail_lists[i].prio = 1; | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~ In file included from mm/swapfile.c:16: ./include/linux/swap.h:292:27: note: while referencing ‘avail_lists’ 292 | struct plist_node avail_lists[]; /* | ^~~~~~~~~~~ Reported-by: Christophe de Dinechin Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220414150855.2407137-3-dinechin@redhat.com/ Cc: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: Yury Norov Cc: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Rasmus Villemoes Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Zhen Lei Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: Yury Norov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

nodemask.h: fix compilation error with GCC12

2022-06-14T14:52:36+00:00

commit 37462a920392cb86541650a6f4121155f11f1199 upstream. With gcc version 12.0.1 20220401 (Red Hat 12.0.1-0), building with defconfig results in the following compilation error: | CC mm/swapfile.o | mm/swapfile.c: In function `setup_swap_info': | mm/swapfile.c:2291:47: error: array subscript -1 is below array bounds | of `struct plist_node[]' [-Werror=array-bounds] | 2291 | p->avail_lists[i].prio = 1; | | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~ | In file included from mm/swapfile.c:16: | ./include/linux/swap.h:292:27: note: while referencing `avail_lists' | 292 | struct plist_node avail_lists[]; /* | | ^~~~~~~~~~~ This is due to the compiler detecting that the mask in node_states[__state] could theoretically be zero, which would lead to first_node() returning -1 through find_first_bit. I believe that the warning/error is legitimate. I first tried adding a test to check that the node mask is not emtpy, since a similar test exists in the case where MAX_NUMNODES == 1. However, adding the if statement causes other warnings to appear in for_each_cpu_node_but, because it introduces a dangling else ambiguity. And unfortunately, GCC is not smart enough to detect that the added test makes the case where (node) == -1 impossible, so it still complains with the same message. This is why I settled on replacing that with a harmless, but relatively useless (node) >= 0 test. Based on the warning for the dangling else, I also decided to fix the case where MAX_NUMNODES == 1 by moving the condition inside the for loop. It will still only be tested once. This ensures that the meaning of an else following for_each_node_mask or derivatives would not silently have a different meaning depending on the configuration. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220414150855.2407137-3-dinechin@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Christophe de Dinechin Signed-off-by: Christophe de Dinechin Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton Cc: Ben Segall Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Steven Rostedt Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Dietmar Eggemann Cc: Vincent Guittot Cc: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira Cc: Jason Wang Cc: Zhen Lei Cc: Juri Lelli Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

scsi: fcoe: Fix Wstringop-overflow warnings in fcoe_wwn_from_mac()

2022-06-14T14:52:33+00:00

[ Upstream commit 54db804d5d7d36709d1ce70bde3b9a6c61b290b6 ] Fix the following Wstringop-overflow warnings when building with GCC-11: drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c: In function ‘fcoe_netdev_config’: drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c:744:32: warning: ‘fcoe_wwn_from_mac’ accessing 32 bytes in a region of size 6 [-Wstringop-overflow=] 744 | wwnn = fcoe_wwn_from_mac(ctlr->ctl_src_addr, 1, 0); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c:744:32: note: referencing argument 1 of type ‘unsigned char *’ In file included from drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c:36: ./include/scsi/libfcoe.h:252:5: note: in a call to function ‘fcoe_wwn_from_mac’ 252 | u64 fcoe_wwn_from_mac(unsigned char mac[MAX_ADDR_LEN], unsigned int, unsigned int); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c:747:32: warning: ‘fcoe_wwn_from_mac’ accessing 32 bytes in a region of size 6 [-Wstringop-overflow=] 747 | wwpn = fcoe_wwn_from_mac(ctlr->ctl_src_addr, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 748 | 2, 0); | ~~~~~ drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c:747:32: note: referencing argument 1 of type ‘unsigned char *’ In file included from drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c:36: ./include/scsi/libfcoe.h:252:5: note: in a call to function ‘fcoe_wwn_from_mac’ 252 | u64 fcoe_wwn_from_mac(unsigned char mac[MAX_ADDR_LEN], unsigned int, unsigned int); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CC drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_io.o In function ‘bnx2fc_net_config’, inlined from ‘bnx2fc_if_create’ at drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c:1543:7: drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c:833:32: warning: ‘fcoe_wwn_from_mac’ accessing 32 bytes in a region of size 6 [-Wstringop-overflow=] 833 | wwnn = fcoe_wwn_from_mac(ctlr->ctl_src_addr, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 834 | 1, 0); | ~~~~~ drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c: In function ‘bnx2fc_if_create’: drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c:833:32: note: referencing argument 1 of type ‘unsigned char *’ In file included from drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc.h:53, from drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c:17: ./include/scsi/libfcoe.h:252:5: note: in a call to function ‘fcoe_wwn_from_mac’ 252 | u64 fcoe_wwn_from_mac(unsigned char mac[MAX_ADDR_LEN], unsigned int, unsigned int); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In function ‘bnx2fc_net_config’, inlined from ‘bnx2fc_if_create’ at drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c:1543:7: drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c:839:32: warning: ‘fcoe_wwn_from_mac’ accessing 32 bytes in a region of size 6 [-Wstringop-overflow=] 839 | wwpn = fcoe_wwn_from_mac(ctlr->ctl_src_addr, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 840 | 2, 0); | ~~~~~ drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c: In function ‘bnx2fc_if_create’: drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c:839:32: note: referencing argument 1 of type ‘unsigned char *’ In file included from drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc.h:53, from drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c:17: ./include/scsi/libfcoe.h:252:5: note: in a call to function ‘fcoe_wwn_from_mac’ 252 | u64 fcoe_wwn_from_mac(unsigned char mac[MAX_ADDR_LEN], unsigned int, unsigned int); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_main.c: In function ‘__qedf_probe’: drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_main.c:3520:30: warning: ‘fcoe_wwn_from_mac’ accessing 32 bytes in a region of size 6 [-Wstringop-overflow=] 3520 | qedf->wwnn = fcoe_wwn_from_mac(qedf->mac, 1, 0); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_main.c:3520:30: note: referencing argument 1 of type ‘unsigned char *’ In file included from drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf.h:9, from drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_main.c:23: ./include/scsi/libfcoe.h:252:5: note: in a call to function ‘fcoe_wwn_from_mac’ 252 | u64 fcoe_wwn_from_mac(unsigned char mac[MAX_ADDR_LEN], unsigned int, unsigned int); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_main.c:3521:30: warning: ‘fcoe_wwn_from_mac’ accessing 32 bytes in a region of size 6 [-Wstringop-overflow=] 3521 | qedf->wwpn = fcoe_wwn_from_mac(qedf->mac, 2, 0); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_main.c:3521:30: note: referencing argument 1 of type ‘unsigned char *’ In file included from drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf.h:9, from drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_main.c:23: ./include/scsi/libfcoe.h:252:5: note: in a call to function ‘fcoe_wwn_from_mac’ 252 | u64 fcoe_wwn_from_mac(unsigned char mac[MAX_ADDR_LEN], unsigned int, unsigned int); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ by changing the array size to the correct value of ETH_ALEN in the argument declaration. Also, fix a couple of checkpatch warnings: WARNING: function definition argument 'unsigned int' should also have an identifier name This helps with the ongoing efforts to globally enable -Wstringop-overflow. Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/181 Fixes: 85b4aa4926a5 ("[SCSI] fcoe: Fibre Channel over Ethernet") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

drm: fix EDID struct for old ARM OABI format

2022-06-14T14:52:30+00:00

[ Upstream commit 47f15561b69e226bfc034e94ff6dbec51a4662af ] When building the kernel for arm with the "-mabi=apcs-gnu" option, gcc will force alignment of all structures and unions to a word boundary (see also STRUCTURE_SIZE_BOUNDARY and the "-mstructure-size-boundary=XX" option if you're a gcc person), even when the members of said structures do not want or need said alignment. This completely messes up the structure alignment of 'struct edid' on those targets, because even though all the embedded structures are marked with "__attribute__((packed))", the unions that contain them are not. This was exposed by commit f1e4c916f97f ("drm/edid: add EDID block count and size helpers"), but the bug is pre-existing. That commit just made the structure layout problem cause a build failure due to the addition of the BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*edid) != EDID_LENGTH); sanity check in drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c:edid_block_data(). This legacy union alignment should probably not be used in the first place, but we can fix the layout by adding the packed attribute to the union entries even when each member is already packed and it shouldn't matter in a sane build environment. You can see this issue with a trivial test program: union { struct { char c[5]; }; struct { char d; unsigned e; } __attribute__((packed)); } a = { "1234" }; where building this with a normal "gcc -S" will result in the expected 5-byte size of said union: .type a, @object .size a, 5 but with an ARM compiler and the old ABI: arm-linux-gnu-gcc -mabi=apcs-gnu -mfloat-abi=soft -S t.c you get .type a, %object .size a, 8 instead, because even though each member of the union is packed, the union itself still gets aligned. This was reported by Sudip for the spear3xx_defconfig target. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YpCUzStDnSgQLNFN@debian/ Reported-by: Sudip Mukherjee Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Maarten Lankhorst Cc: Maxime Ripard Cc: Thomas Zimmermann Cc: David Airlie Cc: Daniel Vetter Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ALSA: jack: Access input_dev under mutex

2022-06-14T14:52:28+00:00

[ Upstream commit 1b6a6fc5280e97559287b61eade2d4b363e836f2 ] It is possible when using ASoC that input_dev is unregistered while calling snd_jack_report, which causes NULL pointer dereference. In order to prevent this serialize access to input_dev using mutex lock. Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński Reviewed-by: Cezary Rojewski Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220412091628.3056922-1-amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ptrace/xtensa: Replace PT_SINGLESTEP with TIF_SINGLESTEP

2022-06-14T14:52:28+00:00

commit 4a3d2717d140401df7501a95e454180831a0c5af upstream. xtensa is the last user of the PT_SINGLESTEP flag. Changing tsk->ptrace in user_enable_single_step and user_disable_single_step without locking could potentiallly cause problems. So use a thread info flag instead of a flag in tsk->ptrace. Use TIF_SINGLESTEP that xtensa already had defined but unused. Remove the definitions of PT_SINGLESTEP and PT_BLOCKSTEP as they have no more users. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: Max Filippov Tested-by: Kees Cook Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220505182645.497868-4-ebiederm@xmission.com Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

net: Fix features skip in for_each_netdev_feature()

2022-05-18T07:15:42+00:00

[ Upstream commit 85db6352fc8a158a893151baa1716463d34a20d0 ] The find_next_netdev_feature() macro gets the "remaining length", not bit index. Passing "bit - 1" for the following iteration is wrong as it skips the adjacent bit. Pass "bit" instead. Fixes: 3b89ea9c5902 ("net: Fix for_each_netdev_feature on Big endian") Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan Reviewed-by: Gal Pressman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220504080914.1918-1-tariqt@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin