kernel/linux.git/include/linux/signal.h, branch linux-5.8.y

binfmt_elf: remove the set_fs in fill_siginfo_note

2020-05-05T20:46:10+00:00

The code in binfmt_elf.c is differnt from the rest of the code that processes siginfo, as it sends siginfo from a kernel buffer to a file rather than from kernel memory to userspace buffers. To remove it's use of set_fs the code needs some different siginfo helpers. Add the helper copy_siginfo_to_external to copy from the kernel's internal siginfo layout to a buffer in the siginfo layout that userspace expects. Modify fill_siginfo_note to use copy_siginfo_to_external instead of set_fs and copy_siginfo_to_user. Update compat_binfmt_elf.c to use the previously added copy_siginfo_to_external32 to handle the compat case. Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Al Viro

x86: get rid of put_user_try in __setup_rt_frame() (both 32bit and 64bit)

2020-03-26T18:41:22+00:00

Straightforward, except for save_altstack_ex() stuck in those. Replace that thing with an analogue that would use unsafe_put_user() instead of put_user_ex() (called compat_save_altstack()) and be done with that. Signed-off-by: Al Viro

signal: Allow cifs and drbd to receive their terminating signals

2019-08-19T11:34:13+00:00

My recent to change to only use force_sig for a synchronous events wound up breaking signal reception cifs and drbd. I had overlooked the fact that by default kthreads start out with all signals set to SIG_IGN. So a change I thought was safe turned out to have made it impossible for those kernel thread to catch their signals. Reverting the work on force_sig is a bad idea because what the code was doing was very much a misuse of force_sig. As the way force_sig ultimately allowed the signal to happen was to change the signal handler to SIG_DFL. Which after the first signal will allow userspace to send signals to these kernel threads. At least for wake_ack_receiver in drbd that does not appear actively wrong. So correct this problem by adding allow_kernel_signal that will allow signals whose siginfo reports they were sent by the kernel through, but will not allow userspace generated signals, and update cifs and drbd to call allow_kernel_signal in an appropriate place so that their thread can receive this signal. Fixing things this way ensures that userspace won't be able to send signals and cause problems, that it is clear which signals the threads are expecting to receive, and it guarantees that nothing else in the system will be affected. This change was partly inspired by similar cifs and drbd patches that added allow_signal. Reported-by: ronnie sahlberg Reported-by: Christoph Böhmwalder Tested-by: Christoph Böhmwalder Cc: Steve French Cc: Philipp Reisner Cc: David Laight Fixes: 247bc9470b1e ("cifs: fix rmmod regression in cifs.ko caused by force_sig changes") Fixes: 72abe3bcf091 ("signal/cifs: Fix cifs_put_tcp_session to call send_sig instead of force_sig") Fixes: fee109901f39 ("signal/drbd: Use send_sig not force_sig") Fixes: 3cf5d076fb4d ("signal: Remove task parameter from force_sig") Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman"

signal: simplify set_user_sigmask/restore_user_sigmask

2019-07-17T02:23:24+00:00

task->saved_sigmask and ->restore_sigmask are only used in the ret-from- syscall paths. This means that set_user_sigmask() can save ->blocked in ->saved_sigmask and do set_restore_sigmask() to indicate that ->blocked was modified. This way the callers do not need 2 sigset_t's passed to set/restore and restore_user_sigmask() renamed to restore_saved_sigmask_unless() turns into the trivial helper which just calls restore_saved_sigmask(). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190606113206.GA9464@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Deepa Dinamani Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Jens Axboe Cc: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: Eric Wong Cc: Jason Baron Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Al Viro Cc: Eric W. Biederman Cc: David Laight Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

signal: remove the wrong signal_pending() check in restore_user_sigmask()

2019-06-29T08:43:45+00:00

This is the minimal fix for stable, I'll send cleanups later. Commit 854a6ed56839 ("signal: Add restore_user_sigmask()") introduced the visible change which breaks user-space: a signal temporary unblocked by set_user_sigmask() can be delivered even if the caller returns success or timeout. Change restore_user_sigmask() to accept the additional "interrupted" argument which should be used instead of signal_pending() check, and update the callers. Eric said: : For clarity. I don't think this is required by posix, or fundamentally to : remove the races in select. It is what linux has always done and we have : applications who care so I agree this fix is needed. : : Further in any case where the semantic change that this patch rolls back : (aka where allowing a signal to be delivered and the select like call to : complete) would be advantage we can do as well if not better by using : signalfd. : : Michael is there any chance we can get this guarantee of the linux : implementation of pselect and friends clearly documented. The guarantee : that if the system call completes successfully we are guaranteed that no : signal that is unblocked by using sigmask will be delivered? Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604134117.GA29963@redhat.com Fixes: 854a6ed56839a40f6b5d02a2962f48841482eec4 ("signal: Add restore_user_sigmask()") Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Reported-by: Eric Wong Tested-by: Eric Wong Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann Acked-by: Deepa Dinamani Cc: Michael Kerrisk Cc: Jens Axboe Cc: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: Jason Baron Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Al Viro Cc: David Laight Cc: [5.0+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

signal: Make siginmask safe when passed a signal of 0

2019-01-12T17:48:20+00:00

Eric Biggers reported: > The following commit, which went into v4.20, introduced undefined behavior when > sys_rt_sigqueueinfo() is called with sig=0: > > commit 4ce5f9c9e7546915c559ffae594e6d73f918db00 > Author: Eric W. Biederman > Date: Tue Sep 25 12:59:31 2018 +0200 > > signal: Use a smaller struct siginfo in the kernel > > In sig_specific_sicodes(), used from known_siginfo_layout(), the expression > '1ULL << ((sig)-1)' is undefined as it evaluates to 1ULL << 4294967295. > > Reproducer: > > #include > #include > #include > > int main(void) > { > siginfo_t si = { .si_code = 1 }; > syscall(__NR_rt_sigqueueinfo, 0, 0, &si); > } > > UBSAN report for v5.0-rc1: > > UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in kernel/signal.c:2946:7 > shift exponent 4294967295 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int' > CPU: 2 PID: 346 Comm: syz_signal Not tainted 5.0.0-rc1 #25 > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014 > Call Trace: > __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] > dump_stack+0x70/0xa5 lib/dump_stack.c:113 > ubsan_epilogue+0xd/0x40 lib/ubsan.c:159 > __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x12c/0x170 lib/ubsan.c:425 > known_siginfo_layout+0xae/0xe0 kernel/signal.c:2946 > post_copy_siginfo_from_user kernel/signal.c:3009 [inline] > __copy_siginfo_from_user+0x35/0x60 kernel/signal.c:3035 > __do_sys_rt_sigqueueinfo kernel/signal.c:3553 [inline] > __se_sys_rt_sigqueueinfo kernel/signal.c:3549 [inline] > __x64_sys_rt_sigqueueinfo+0x31/0x70 kernel/signal.c:3549 > do_syscall_64+0x4c/0x1b0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290 > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe > RIP: 0033:0x433639 > Code: c4 18 c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 7b 27 00 00 c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 > RSP: 002b:00007fffcb289fc8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000081 > RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000004002e0 RCX: 0000000000433639 > RDX: 00007fffcb289fd0 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 > RBP: 00000000006b2018 R08: 000000000000004d R09: 0000000000000000 > R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000401560 > R13: 00000000004015f0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 I have looked at the other callers of siginmask and they all appear to in locations where sig can not be zero. I have looked at the code generation of adding an extra test against zero and gcc was able with a simple decrement instruction to combine the two tests together. So the at most adding this test cost a single cpu cycle. In practice that decrement instruction was already present as part of the mask comparison, so the only change was when the instruction was executed. So given that it is cheap, and obviously correct to update siginmask to verify the signal is not zero. Fix this issue there to avoid any future problems. Reported-by: Eric Biggers Fixes: 4ce5f9c9e754 ("signal: Use a smaller struct siginfo in the kernel") Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman"

signal: Add restore_user_sigmask()

2018-12-06T16:22:53+00:00

Refactor the logic to restore the sigmask before the syscall returns into an api. This is useful for versions of syscalls that pass in the sigmask and expect the current->sigmask to be changed during the execution and restored after the execution of the syscall. With the advent of new y2038 syscalls in the subsequent patches, we add two more new versions of the syscalls (for pselect, ppoll and io_pgetevents) in addition to the existing native and compat versions. Adding such an api reduces the logic that would need to be replicated otherwise. Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann

signal: Add set_user_sigmask()

2018-12-06T16:22:38+00:00

Refactor reading sigset from userspace and updating sigmask into an api. This is useful for versions of syscalls that pass in the sigmask and expect the current->sigmask to be changed during, and restored after, the execution of the syscall. With the advent of new y2038 syscalls in the subsequent patches, we add two more new versions of the syscalls (for pselect, ppoll, and io_pgetevents) in addition to the existing native and compat versions. Adding such an api reduces the logic that would need to be replicated otherwise. Note that the calls to sigprocmask() ignored the return value from the api as the function only returns an error on an invalid first argument that is hardcoded at these call sites. The updated logic uses set_current_blocked() instead. Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann

include/linux/signal.h: mark expected switch fall-throughs

2018-10-31T15:54:14+00:00

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181013114847.GA3160@embeddedor.com Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Acked-by: Kees Cook Reviewed-by: Michael Ellerman Cc: Oleg Nesterov Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

signal: Guard against negative signal numbers in copy_siginfo_from_user32

2018-10-11T01:34:14+00:00

While fixing an out of bounds array access in known_siginfo_layout reported by the kernel test robot it became apparent that the same bug exists in siginfo_layout and affects copy_siginfo_from_user32. The straight forward fix that makes guards against making this mistake in the future and should keep the code size small is to just take an unsigned signal number instead of a signed signal number, as I did to fix known_siginfo_layout. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: cc731525f26a ("signal: Remove kernel interal si_code magic") Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman"