kernel/linux.git/include/linux/page-isolation.h, branch v6.6.132

mm: remove obsolete alloc_migrate_target()

2023-06-19T23:19:00+00:00

There's only declaration left in the header file. Remove it. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230603142513.787000-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand Cc: Johannes Weiner Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

mm: page_isolation: write proper kerneldoc

2023-06-19T23:18:59+00:00

And remove the incorrect header comments. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/lower/first/, s/upper/last/, per Mike] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230519111652.40658-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner Cc: Mike Rapoport Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

mm: make alloc_contig_range work at pageblock granularity

2022-05-13T14:20:13+00:00

alloc_contig_range() worked at MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES granularity to avoid merging pageblocks with different migratetypes. It might unnecessarily convert extra pageblocks at the beginning and at the end of the range. Change alloc_contig_range() to work at pageblock granularity. Special handling is needed for free pages and in-use pages across the boundaries of the range specified by alloc_contig_range(). Because these= Partially isolated pages causes free page accounting issues. The free pages will be split and freed into separate migratetype lists; the in-use= Pages will be migrated then the freed pages will be handled in the aforementioned way. [ziy@nvidia.com: fix deadlock/crash] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/23A7297E-6C84-4138-A9FE-3598234004E6@nvidia.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220425143118.2850746-4-zi.yan@sent.com Signed-off-by: Zi Yan Reported-by: kernel test robot Cc: Christophe Leroy Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: Eric Ren Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: Minchan Kim Cc: Oscar Salvador Cc: Vlastimil Babka Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

mm: page_isolation: move has_unmovable_pages() to mm/page_isolation.c

2022-05-13T14:20:12+00:00

Patch series "Use pageblock_order for cma and alloc_contig_range alignment", v11. This patchset tries to remove the MAX_ORDER-1 alignment requirement for CMA and alloc_contig_range(). It prepares for my upcoming changes to make MAX_ORDER adjustable at boot time[1]. The MAX_ORDER - 1 alignment requirement comes from that alloc_contig_range() isolates pageblocks to remove free memory from buddy allocator but isolating only a subset of pageblocks within a page spanning across multiple pageblocks causes free page accounting issues. Isolated page might not be put into the right free list, since the code assumes the migratetype of the first pageblock as the whole free page migratetype. This is based on the discussion at [2]. To remove the requirement, this patchset: 1. isolates pages at pageblock granularity instead of max(MAX_ORDER_NR_PAEGS, pageblock_nr_pages); 2. splits free pages across the specified range or migrates in-use pages across the specified range then splits the freed page to avoid free page accounting issues (it happens when multiple pageblocks within a single page have different migratetypes); 3. only checks unmovable pages within the range instead of MAX_ORDER - 1 aligned range during isolation to avoid alloc_contig_range() failure when pageblocks within a MAX_ORDER - 1 aligned range are allocated separately. 4. returns pages not in the range as it did before. One optimization might come later: 1. make MIGRATE_ISOLATE a separate bit to be able to restore the original migratetypes when isolation fails in the middle of the range. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210805190253.2795604-1-zi.yan@sent.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/d19fb078-cb9b-f60f-e310-fdeea1b947d2@redhat.com/ This patch (of 6): has_unmovable_pages() is only used in mm/page_isolation.c. Move it from mm/page_alloc.c and make it static. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220425143118.2850746-2-zi.yan@sent.com Signed-off-by: Zi Yan Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport Acked-by: David Hildenbrand Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Eric Ren Cc: Christophe Leroy Cc: Minchan Kim Cc: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

mm/hotplug: silence a lockdep splat with printk()

2020-01-31T18:30:39+00:00

It is not that hard to trigger lockdep splats by calling printk from under zone->lock. Most of them are false positives caused by lock chains introduced early in the boot process and they do not cause any real problems (although most of the early boot lock dependencies could happen after boot as well). There are some console drivers which do allocate from the printk context as well and those should be fixed. In any case, false positives are not that trivial to workaround and it is far from optimal to lose lockdep functionality for something that is a non-issue. So change has_unmovable_pages() so that it no longer calls dump_page() itself - instead it returns a "struct page *" of the unmovable page back to the caller so that in the case of a has_unmovable_pages() failure, the caller can call dump_page() after releasing zone->lock. Also, make dump_page() is able to report a CMA page as well, so the reason string from has_unmovable_pages() can be removed. Even though has_unmovable_pages doesn't hold any reference to the returned page this should be reasonably safe for the purpose of reporting the page (dump_page) because it cannot be hotremoved in the context of memory unplug. The state of the page might change but that is the case even with the existing code as zone->lock only plays role for free pages. While at it, remove a similar but unnecessary debug-only printk() as well. A sample of one of those lockdep splats is, WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected ------------------------------------------------------ test.sh/8653 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff865a4460 (console_owner){-.-.}, at: console_unlock+0x207/0x750 but task is already holding lock: ffff88883fff3c58 (&(&zone->lock)->rlock){-.-.}, at: __offline_isolated_pages+0x179/0x3e0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&(&zone->lock)->rlock){-.-.}: __lock_acquire+0x5b3/0xb40 lock_acquire+0x126/0x280 _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 rmqueue_bulk.constprop.21+0xb6/0x1160 get_page_from_freelist+0x898/0x22c0 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x2f3/0x1cd0 alloc_pages_current+0x9c/0x110 allocate_slab+0x4c6/0x19c0 new_slab+0x46/0x70 ___slab_alloc+0x58b/0x960 __slab_alloc+0x43/0x70 __kmalloc+0x3ad/0x4b0 __tty_buffer_request_room+0x100/0x250 tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag+0x67/0x110 pty_write+0xa2/0xf0 n_tty_write+0x36b/0x7b0 tty_write+0x284/0x4c0 __vfs_write+0x50/0xa0 vfs_write+0x105/0x290 redirected_tty_write+0x6a/0xc0 do_iter_write+0x248/0x2a0 vfs_writev+0x106/0x1e0 do_writev+0xd4/0x180 __x64_sys_writev+0x45/0x50 do_syscall_64+0xcc/0x76c entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe -> #2 (&(&port->lock)->rlock){-.-.}: __lock_acquire+0x5b3/0xb40 lock_acquire+0x126/0x280 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3a/0x50 tty_port_tty_get+0x20/0x60 tty_port_default_wakeup+0xf/0x30 tty_port_tty_wakeup+0x39/0x40 uart_write_wakeup+0x2a/0x40 serial8250_tx_chars+0x22e/0x440 serial8250_handle_irq.part.8+0x14a/0x170 serial8250_default_handle_irq+0x5c/0x90 serial8250_interrupt+0xa6/0x130 __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x78/0x4f0 handle_irq_event_percpu+0x70/0x100 handle_irq_event+0x5a/0x8b handle_edge_irq+0x117/0x370 do_IRQ+0x9e/0x1e0 ret_from_intr+0x0/0x2a cpuidle_enter_state+0x156/0x8e0 cpuidle_enter+0x41/0x70 call_cpuidle+0x5e/0x90 do_idle+0x333/0x370 cpu_startup_entry+0x1d/0x1f start_secondary+0x290/0x330 secondary_startup_64+0xb6/0xc0 -> #1 (&port_lock_key){-.-.}: __lock_acquire+0x5b3/0xb40 lock_acquire+0x126/0x280 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3a/0x50 serial8250_console_write+0x3e4/0x450 univ8250_console_write+0x4b/0x60 console_unlock+0x501/0x750 vprintk_emit+0x10d/0x340 vprintk_default+0x1f/0x30 vprintk_func+0x44/0xd4 printk+0x9f/0xc5 -> #0 (console_owner){-.-.}: check_prev_add+0x107/0xea0 validate_chain+0x8fc/0x1200 __lock_acquire+0x5b3/0xb40 lock_acquire+0x126/0x280 console_unlock+0x269/0x750 vprintk_emit+0x10d/0x340 vprintk_default+0x1f/0x30 vprintk_func+0x44/0xd4 printk+0x9f/0xc5 __offline_isolated_pages.cold.52+0x2f/0x30a offline_isolated_pages_cb+0x17/0x30 walk_system_ram_range+0xda/0x160 __offline_pages+0x79c/0xa10 offline_pages+0x11/0x20 memory_subsys_offline+0x7e/0xc0 device_offline+0xd5/0x110 state_store+0xc6/0xe0 dev_attr_store+0x3f/0x60 sysfs_kf_write+0x89/0xb0 kernfs_fop_write+0x188/0x240 __vfs_write+0x50/0xa0 vfs_write+0x105/0x290 ksys_write+0xc6/0x160 __x64_sys_write+0x43/0x50 do_syscall_64+0xcc/0x76c entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: console_owner --> &(&port->lock)->rlock --> &(&zone->lock)->rlock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&(&zone->lock)->rlock); lock(&(&port->lock)->rlock); lock(&(&zone->lock)->rlock); lock(console_owner); *** DEADLOCK *** 9 locks held by test.sh/8653: #0: ffff88839ba7d408 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x25f/0x290 #1: ffff888277618880 (&of->mutex){+.+.}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0x128/0x240 #2: ffff8898131fc218 (kn->count#115){.+.+}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0x138/0x240 #3: ffffffff86962a80 (device_hotplug_lock){+.+.}, at: lock_device_hotplug_sysfs+0x16/0x50 #4: ffff8884374f4990 (&dev->mutex){....}, at: device_offline+0x70/0x110 #5: ffffffff86515250 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}, at: __offline_pages+0xbf/0xa10 #6: ffffffff867405f0 (mem_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}, at: percpu_down_write+0x87/0x2f0 #7: ffff88883fff3c58 (&(&zone->lock)->rlock){-.-.}, at: __offline_isolated_pages+0x179/0x3e0 #8: ffffffff865a4920 (console_lock){+.+.}, at: vprintk_emit+0x100/0x340 stack backtrace: Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL560 Gen10/ProLiant DL560 Gen10, BIOS U34 05/21/2019 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x86/0xca print_circular_bug.cold.31+0x243/0x26e check_noncircular+0x29e/0x2e0 check_prev_add+0x107/0xea0 validate_chain+0x8fc/0x1200 __lock_acquire+0x5b3/0xb40 lock_acquire+0x126/0x280 console_unlock+0x269/0x750 vprintk_emit+0x10d/0x340 vprintk_default+0x1f/0x30 vprintk_func+0x44/0xd4 printk+0x9f/0xc5 __offline_isolated_pages.cold.52+0x2f/0x30a offline_isolated_pages_cb+0x17/0x30 walk_system_ram_range+0xda/0x160 __offline_pages+0x79c/0xa10 offline_pages+0x11/0x20 memory_subsys_offline+0x7e/0xc0 device_offline+0xd5/0x110 state_store+0xc6/0xe0 dev_attr_store+0x3f/0x60 sysfs_kf_write+0x89/0xb0 kernfs_fop_write+0x188/0x240 __vfs_write+0x50/0xa0 vfs_write+0x105/0x290 ksys_write+0xc6/0x160 __x64_sys_write+0x43/0x50 do_syscall_64+0xcc/0x76c entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200117181200.20299-1-cai@lca.pw Signed-off-by: Qian Cai Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Petr Mladek Cc: Steven Rostedt (VMware) Cc: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm: remove "count" parameter from has_unmovable_pages()

2020-01-31T18:30:38+00:00

Now that the memory isolate notifier is gone, the parameter is always 0. Drop it and cleanup has_unmovable_pages(). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191114131911.11783-3-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand Acked-by: Michal Hocko Cc: Oscar Salvador Cc: Anshuman Khandual Cc: Qian Cai Cc: Pingfan Liu Cc: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Pavel Tatashin Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: Wei Yang Cc: Alexander Duyck Cc: Alexander Potapenko Cc: Arun KS Cc: Michael Ellerman Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm/page_isolation.c: convert SKIP_HWPOISON to MEMORY_OFFLINE

2019-12-01T20:59:04+00:00

We have two types of users of page isolation: 1. Memory offlining: Offline memory so it can be unplugged. Memory won't be touched. 2. Memory allocation: Allocate memory (e.g., alloc_contig_range()) to become the owner of the memory and make use of it. For example, in case we want to offline memory, we can ignore (skip over) PageHWPoison() pages, as the memory won't get used. We can allow to offline memory. In contrast, we don't want to allow to allocate such memory. Let's generalize the approach so we can special case other types of pages we want to skip over in case we offline memory. While at it, also pass the same flags to test_pages_isolated(). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191021172353.3056-3-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand Suggested-by: Michal Hocko Acked-by: Michal Hocko Cc: Oscar Salvador Cc: Anshuman Khandual Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: Pingfan Liu Cc: Qian Cai Cc: Pavel Tatashin Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: Alexander Duyck Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: Pavel Tatashin Cc: Wei Yang Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm/page_isolation.c: change the prototype of undo_isolate_page_range()

2019-07-12T18:05:43+00:00

undo_isolate_page_range() never fails, so no need to return value. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1562075604-8979-1-git-send-email-kernelfans@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu Acked-by: Michal Hocko Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual Cc: Qian Cai Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm/hotplug: fix offline undo_isolate_page_range()

2019-03-29T17:01:37+00:00

Commit f1dd2cd13c4b ("mm, memory_hotplug: do not associate hotadded memory to zones until online") introduced move_pfn_range_to_zone() which calls memmap_init_zone() during onlining a memory block. memmap_init_zone() will reset pagetype flags and makes migrate type to be MOVABLE. However, in __offline_pages(), it also call undo_isolate_page_range() after offline_isolated_pages() to do the same thing. Due to commit 2ce13640b3f4 ("mm: __first_valid_page skip over offline pages") changed __first_valid_page() to skip offline pages, undo_isolate_page_range() here just waste CPU cycles looping around the offlining PFN range while doing nothing, because __first_valid_page() will return NULL as offline_isolated_pages() has already marked all memory sections within the pfn range as offline via offline_mem_sections(). Also, after calling the "useless" undo_isolate_page_range() here, it reaches the point of no returning by notifying MEM_OFFLINE. Those pages will be marked as MIGRATE_MOVABLE again once onlining. The only thing left to do is to decrease the number of isolated pageblocks zone counter which would make some paths of the page allocation slower that the above commit introduced. Even if alloc_contig_range() can be used to isolate 16GB-hugetlb pages on ppc64, an "int" should still be enough to represent the number of pageblocks there. Fix an incorrect comment along the way. [cai@lca.pw: v4] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190314150641.59358-1-cai@lca.pw Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190313143133.46200-1-cai@lca.pw Fixes: 2ce13640b3f4 ("mm: __first_valid_page skip over offline pages") Signed-off-by: Qian Cai Acked-by: Michal Hocko Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: [4.13+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm: only report isolation failures when offlining memory

2018-12-28T20:11:46+00:00

Heiko has complained that his log is swamped by warnings from has_unmovable_pages [ 20.536664] page dumped because: has_unmovable_pages [ 20.536792] page:000003d081ff4080 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:000000008ff88600 index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0 [ 20.536794] flags: 0x3fffe0000010200(slab|head) [ 20.536795] raw: 03fffe0000010200 0000000000000100 0000000000000200 000000008ff88600 [ 20.536796] raw: 0000000000000000 0020004100000000 ffffffff00000001 0000000000000000 [ 20.536797] page dumped because: has_unmovable_pages [ 20.536814] page:000003d0823b0000 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 [ 20.536815] flags: 0x7fffe0000000000() [ 20.536817] raw: 07fffe0000000000 0000000000000100 0000000000000200 0000000000000000 [ 20.536818] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff00000001 0000000000000000 which are not triggered by the memory hotplug but rather CMA allocator. The original idea behind dumping the page state for all call paths was that these messages will be helpful debugging failures. From the above it seems that this is not the case for the CMA path because we are lacking much more context. E.g the second reported page might be a CMA allocated page. It is still interesting to see a slab page in the CMA area but it is hard to tell whether this is bug from the above output alone. Address this issue by dumping the page state only on request. Both start_isolate_page_range and has_unmovable_pages already have an argument to ignore hwpoison pages so make this argument more generic and turn it into flags and allow callers to combine non-default modes into a mask. While we are at it, has_unmovable_pages call from is_pageblock_removable_nolock (sysfs removable file) is questionable to report the failure so drop it from there as well. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181218092802.31429-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko Reported-by: Heiko Carstens Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador Cc: Anshuman Khandual Cc: Stephen Rothwell Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds