kernel/linux.git/include/linux/numa.h, branch v6.6.132

memblock: use numa_valid_node() helper to check for invalid node ID

2025-01-17T12:36:09+00:00

commit 8043832e2a123fd9372007a29192f2f3ba328cd6 upstream. Introduce numa_valid_node(nid) that verifies that nid is a valid node ID and use that instead of comparing nid parameter with either NUMA_NO_NODE or MAX_NUMNODES. This makes the checks for valid node IDs consistent and more robust and allows to get rid of multiple WARNings. Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

x86/numa: Fix SRAT lookup of CFMWS ranges with numa_fill_memblks()

2024-06-12T09:11:50+00:00

[ Upstream commit f9f67e5adc8dc2e1cc51ab2d3d6382fa97f074d4 ] For configurations that have the kconfig option NUMA_KEEP_MEMINFO disabled, numa_fill_memblks() only returns with NUMA_NO_MEMBLK (-1). SRAT lookup fails then because an existing SRAT memory range cannot be found for a CFMWS address range. This causes the addition of a duplicate numa_memblk with a different node id and a subsequent page fault and kernel crash during boot. Fix this by making numa_fill_memblks() always available regardless of NUMA_KEEP_MEMINFO. As Dan suggested, the fix is implemented to remove numa_fill_memblks() from sparsemem.h and alos using __weak for the function. Note that the issue was initially introduced with [1]. But since phys_to_target_node() was originally used that returned the valid node 0, an additional numa_memblk was not added. Though, the node id was wrong too, a message is seen then in the logs: kernel/numa.c: pr_info_once("Unknown target node for memory at 0x%llx, assuming node 0\n", [1] commit fd49f99c1809 ("ACPI: NUMA: Add a node and memblk for each CFMWS not in SRAT") Suggested-by: Dan Williams Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/66271b0072317_69102944c@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch/ Fixes: 8f1004679987 ("ACPI/NUMA: Apply SRAT proximity domain to entire CFMWS window") Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron Reviewed-by: Alison Schofield Reviewed-by: Dan Williams Signed-off-by: Robert Richter Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

kernel/numa.c: Move logging out of numa.h

2024-06-12T09:11:50+00:00

[ Upstream commit d7a73e3f089204aee3393687e23fd45a22657b08 ] Moving these stub functions to a .c file means we can kill a sched.h dependency on printk.h. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet Stable-dep-of: f9f67e5adc8d ("x86/numa: Fix SRAT lookup of CFMWS ranges with numa_fill_memblks()") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

x86/numa: Introduce numa_fill_memblks()

2023-11-20T10:58:53+00:00

[ Upstream commit 8f012db27c9516be1a7aca93ea4a6ca9c75056c9 ] numa_fill_memblks() fills in the gaps in numa_meminfo memblks over an physical address range. The ACPI driver will use numa_fill_memblks() to implement a new Linux policy that prescribes extending proximity domains in a portion of a CFMWS window to the entire window. Dan Williams offered this explanation of the policy: A CFWMS is an ACPI data structure that indicates *potential* locations where CXL memory can be placed. It is the playground where the CXL driver has free reign to establish regions. That space can be populated by BIOS created regions, or driver created regions, after hotplug or other reconfiguration. When BIOS creates a region in a CXL Window it additionally describes that subset of the Window range in the other typical ACPI tables SRAT, SLIT, and HMAT. The rationale for BIOS not pre-describing the entire CXL Window in SRAT, SLIT, and HMAT is that it can not predict the future. I.e. there is nothing stopping higher or lower performance devices being placed in the same Window. Compare that to ACPI memory hotplug that just onlines additional capacity in the proximity domain with little freedom for dynamic performance differentiation. That leaves the OS with a choice, should unpopulated window capacity match the proximity domain of an existing region, or should it allocate a new one? This patch takes the simple position of minimizing proximity domain proliferation by reusing any proximity domain intersection for the entire Window. If the Window has no intersections then allocate a new proximity domain. Note that SRAT, SLIT and HMAT information can be enumerated dynamically in a standard way from device provided data. Think of CXL as the end of ACPI needing to describe memory attributes, CXL offers a standard discovery model for performance attributes, but Linux still needs to interoperate with the old regime. Reported-by: Derick Marks Suggested-by: Dan Williams Signed-off-by: Alison Schofield Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Reviewed-by: Dan Williams Tested-by: Derick Marks Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ef078a6f056ca974e5af85997013c0fda9e3326d.1689018477.git.alison.schofield%40intel.com Stable-dep-of: 8f1004679987 ("ACPI/NUMA: Apply SRAT proximity domain to entire CFMWS window") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

numa: Generalize numa_map_to_online_node()

2023-11-20T10:58:51+00:00

[ Upstream commit b1f099b1cf51d553c510c6c8141c27d9ba7ea1fe ] The function in fact searches the nearest node for a given one, based on a N_ONLINE state. This is a common pattern to search for a nearest node. This patch converts numa_map_to_online_node() to numa_nearest_node() so that others won't need to opencode the logic. Signed-off-by: Yury Norov Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Cc: Mel Gorman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230819141239.287290-2-yury.norov@gmail.com Stable-dep-of: 617f2c38cb5c ("sched/topology: Fix sched_numa_find_nth_cpu() in CPU-less case") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

x86/sgx: Add an attribute for the amount of SGX memory in a NUMA node

2021-12-09T15:02:22+00:00

== Problem == The amount of SGX memory on a system is determined by the BIOS and it varies wildly between systems. It can be as small as dozens of MB's and as large as many GB's on servers. Just like how applications need to know how much regular RAM is available, enclave builders need to know how much SGX memory an enclave can consume. == Solution == Introduce a new sysfs file: /sys/devices/system/node/nodeX/x86/sgx_total_bytes to enumerate the amount of SGX memory available in each NUMA node. This serves the same function for SGX as /proc/meminfo or /sys/devices/system/node/nodeX/meminfo does for normal RAM. 'sgx_total_bytes' is needed today to help drive the SGX selftests. SGX-specific swap code is exercised by creating overcommitted enclaves which are larger than the physical SGX memory on the system. They currently use a CPUID-based approach which can diverge from the actual amount of SGX memory available. 'sgx_total_bytes' ensures that the selftests can work efficiently and do not attempt stupid things like creating a 100,000 MB enclave on a system with 128 MB of SGX memory. == Implementation Details == Introduce CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_NODE_DEV_GROUP opt-in flag to expose an arch specific attribute group, and add an attribute for the amount of SGX memory in bytes to each NUMA node: == ABI Design Discussion == As opposed to the per-node ABI, a single, global ABI was considered. However, this would prevent enclaves from being able to size themselves so that they fit on a single NUMA node. Essentially, a single value would rule out NUMA optimizations for enclaves. Create a new "x86/" directory inside each "nodeX/" sysfs directory. 'sgx_total_bytes' is expected to be the first of at least a few sgx-specific files to be placed in the new directory. Just scanning /proc/meminfo, these are the no-brainers that we have for RAM, but we need for SGX: MemTotal: xxxx kB // sgx_total_bytes (implemented here) MemFree: yyyy kB // sgx_free_bytes SwapTotal: zzzz kB // sgx_swapped_bytes So, at *least* three. I think we will eventually end up needing something more along the lines of a dozen. A new directory (as opposed to being in the nodeX/ "root") directory avoids cluttering the root with several "sgx_*" files. Place the new file in a new "nodeX/x86/" directory because SGX is highly x86-specific. It is very unlikely that any other architecture (or even non-Intel x86 vendor) will ever implement SGX. Using "sgx/" as opposed to "x86/" was also considered. But, there is a real chance this can get used for other arch-specific purposes. [ dhansen: rewrite changelog ] Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Acked-by: Borislav Petkov Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211116162116.93081-2-jarkko@kernel.org

mm: fix phys_to_target_node() and memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() exports

2020-11-22T18:48:22+00:00

The core-mm has a default __weak implementation of phys_to_target_node() to mirror the weak definition of memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(). That symbol is exported for modules. However, while the export in mm/memory_hotplug.c exported the symbol in the configuration cases of: CONFIG_NUMA_KEEP_MEMINFO=y CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG=y ...and: CONFIG_NUMA_KEEP_MEMINFO=n CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG=y ...it failed to export the symbol in the case of: CONFIG_NUMA_KEEP_MEMINFO=y CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG=n Not only is that broken, but Christoph points out that the kernel should not be exporting any __weak symbol, which means that memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() example that phys_to_target_node() copied is broken too. Rework the definition of phys_to_target_node() and memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() to not require weak symbols. Move to the common arch override design-pattern of an asm header defining a symbol to replace the default implementation. The only common header that all memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() producing architectures implement is asm/sparsemem.h. In fact, powerpc already defines its memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() helper in sparsemem.h. Double-down on that observation and define phys_to_target_node() where necessary in asm/sparsemem.h. An alternate consideration that was discarded was to put this override in asm/numa.h, but that entangles with the definition of MAX_NUMNODES relative to the inclusion of linux/nodemask.h, and requires powerpc to grow a new header. The dependency on NUMA_KEEP_MEMINFO for DEV_DAX_HMEM_DEVICES is invalid now that the symbol is properly exported / stubbed in all combinations of CONFIG_NUMA_KEEP_MEMINFO and CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG. [dan.j.williams@intel.com: v4] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160461461867.1505359.5301571728749534585.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com [dan.j.williams@intel.com: powerpc: fix create_section_mapping compile warning] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160558386174.2948926.2740149041249041764.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Fixes: a035b6bf863e ("mm/memory_hotplug: introduce default phys_to_target_node() implementation") Reported-by: Randy Dunlap Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner Reported-by: kernel test robot Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Dan Williams Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Tested-by: Randy Dunlap Tested-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Joao Martins Cc: Tony Luck Cc: Fenghua Yu Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: Vishal Verma Cc: Stephen Rothwell Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160447639846.1133764.7044090803980177548.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm/memory_hotplug: introduce default phys_to_target_node() implementation

2020-10-14T01:38:27+00:00

In preparation to set a fallback value for dev_dax->target_node, introduce generic fallback helpers for phys_to_target_node() A generic implementation based on node-data or memblock was proposed, but as noted by Mike: "Here again, I would prefer to add a weak default for phys_to_target_node() because the "generic" implementation is not really generic. The fallback to reserved ranges is x86 specfic because on x86 most of the reserved areas is not in memblock.memory. AFAIK, no other architecture does this." The info message in the generic memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() implementation is fixed up to properly reflect that memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() communicates "online" node info and phys_to_target_node() indicates "target / to-be-onlined" node info. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG=n build] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/202008252130.7YrHIyMI%25lkp@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: Jia He Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Ben Skeggs Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Brice Goglin Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Dave Jiang Cc: David Airlie Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Ira Weiny Cc: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Jeff Moyer Cc: Joao Martins Cc: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: Pavel Tatashin Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Tom Lendacky Cc: Vishal Verma Cc: Wei Yang Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Boris Ostrovsky Cc: Hulk Robot Cc: Jason Yan Cc: "Jérôme Glisse" Cc: Juergen Gross Cc: kernel test robot Cc: Randy Dunlap Cc: Stefano Stabellini Cc: Vivek Goyal Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/159643097768.4062302.3135192588966888630.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

x86/NUMA: Provide a range-to-target_node lookup facility

2020-02-18T18:28:05+00:00

The DEV_DAX_KMEM facility is a generic mechanism to allow device-dax instances, fronting performance-differentiated-memory like pmem, to be added to the System RAM pool. The NUMA node for that hot-added memory is derived from the device-dax instance's 'target_node' attribute. Recall that the 'target_node' is the ACPI-PXM-to-node translation for memory when it comes online whereas the 'numa_node' attribute of the device represents the closest online cpu node. Presently useful target_node information from the ACPI SRAT is discarded with the expectation that "Reserved" memory will never be onlined. Now, DEV_DAX_KMEM violates that assumption, there is a need to retain the translation. Move, rather than discard, numa_memblk data to a secondary array that memory_add_physaddr_to_target_node() may consider at a later point in time. Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: Michal Hocko Reported-by: kbuild test robot Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Dan Williams Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/158188326978.894464.217282995221175417.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com

x86/mm: Introduce CONFIG_NUMA_KEEP_MEMINFO

2020-02-17T18:49:06+00:00

Currently x86 numa_meminfo is marked __initdata in the CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG=n case. In support of a new facility to allow drivers to map reserved memory to a 'target_node' (phys_to_target_node()), add support for removing the __initdata designation for those users. Both memory hotplug and phys_to_target_node() users select CONFIG_NUMA_KEEP_MEMINFO to tell the arch to maintain its physical address to NUMA mapping infrastructure post init. Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: Michal Hocko Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Dan Williams Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/158188326422.894464.15742054998046628934.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com